Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Exam - Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

Posted by Lashawna on Jul 11, 2025 at 08:32 AM

An administrator wants to ensure that VMs can be migrated and restarted on another node in the event of a single-host failure.

What action should be taken in Prism Element to meet this requirement?

Suggested Answer: B

To ensure VM high availability (HA) in the event of a node failure, the administrator must enable HA Reservation (Option B) in Prism Element.

High Availability (HA) in Nutanix ensures that VMs restart on another available node if the host they are running on fails.

Option A (Redundancy Factor 3) affects storage redundancy, not VM failover.

Option C (Protection Domains) is related to disaster recovery (DR), not local HA failover.

Option D (RF1 Storage Container) would reduce fault tolerance and is not recommended for production environments.

References:

Nutanix Prism Element Guide Configuring HA Reservation

Nutanix Bible High Availability (HA) and Failover

Nutanix Support KB VM Recovery with HA Enabled


Get Premium NCP-MCI-6.10 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
SH
Sherman 10 months ago
Wait, can HA really handle all that? Sounds too good to be true!
EV
Eva 10 months ago
Redundancy Factor of 3 seems excessive for just one host failure.
CA
Cary 10 months ago
Definitely need to set up a Protection Domain for this.
KI
Kirk 10 months ago
I think C is more appropriate for this scenario.
WA
Wade 11 months ago
Option B is the way to go for HA!
KR
Kristofer 11 months ago
I vaguely recall something about RF1 storage containers, but I can't remember how they fit into VM migration scenarios.
CA
Cathrine 11 months ago
Configuring a Protection Domain sounds familiar; I feel like it relates to VM availability during host failures.
BE
Bev 11 months ago
I remember practicing with HA settings, but I'm not sure if "Enable HA Reservation" is the right choice here.
JE
Jesusita 11 months ago
I think setting the Redundancy Factor to 3 might be overkill for just ensuring VMs can restart on another node.
GA
Gail 12 months ago
This seems straightforward. Based on the question, the best option is to enable HA Reservation. That will ensure VMs can be automatically restarted on another node if the original host fails. The other choices like Redundancy Factor and Protection Domains don't seem as directly relevant to the specific requirement stated here.
BI
Billye 12 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If the goal is to ensure VMs can be restarted on another node, then I'm guessing the answer has to do with configuring some kind of redundancy or failover mechanism. I'd start by looking at the Redundancy Factor and HA Reservation options.
GR
Grover 12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Prism Element has some HA features, but I'm not totally clear on the differences between the options like Redundancy Factor and HA Reservation. I'll need to review those in more detail.
MA
Malcom 1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about ensuring VM migration and failover in Prism Element. I think the key is to understand the different options available for high availability.
MA
Marilynn 1 year ago
Option A) Set Redundancy Factor to 3 is just overkill. C) is the clean and efficient solution here.
RA
Ranee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marilynn
A) Setting Redundancy Factor to 3 is not necessary.
AG
Agustin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marilynn
C) Configure a Protection Domain.
LE
Leigha 1 year ago
I believe configuring a Protection Domain would be the best option to ensure VMs can be migrated and restarted in case of a single-host failure.
JO
Josue 1 year ago
Haha, D) Configure an RF1 storage container? What is this, a joke? That would just make everything less redundant!
HU
Hubert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Josue
A) Set Redundancy Factor to 3.
CA
Cassandra 1 year ago
I'm not sure about Redundancy Factor, but I think enabling HA Reservation could also help meet the requirement.
JE
Jeanice 1 year ago
I agree with Francene, having a Redundancy Factor of 3 would ensure VMs can be migrated and restarted on another node.
FR
Francene 1 year ago
I think we should set Redundancy Factor to 3.
EM
Emerson 1 year ago
I was thinking B) Enable HA Reservation, but C) makes more sense. Protection Domains are the way to go for high availability.
CH
Charlene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
D) Configure an RF1 storage container might also work, but C) Configure a Protection Domain is the recommended action for this requirement.
GA
Garry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
C) Configure a Protection Domain is the best choice for ensuring VMs can be migrated and restarted on another node in case of a single-host failure.
JU
Juliana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
B) Enable HA Reservation is a good option, but C) Configure a Protection Domain is more reliable for high availability.
KA
Kaitlyn 1 year ago
The correct answer is C) Configure a Protection Domain. This ensures VMs can be migrated and restarted on another node in case of a single-host failure.
RO
Rozella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kaitlyn
B) Enable HA Reservation.
KA
Kattie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kaitlyn
A) Set Redundancy Factor to 3.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel