Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix Exam NCP-MCI-6.10 Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCI-6.10 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All NCP-MCI-6.10 Questions]

The customer expects to maintain a cluster runway of 9 months. The customer doesn't have a budget for 6 months but they want to add new workloads to the existing cluster.

Based on the exhibit, what is required to meet the customer's budgetary timeframe?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The exhibit shows that the overall runway is only 66 days, meaning that the current cluster does not have enough capacity to sustain workloads for 6 months, let alone 9 months.

The best solution is to add resources to the cluster (Option A), such as CPU, memory, or storage, to extend the runway.

Postponing new workloads (Option B) may help in the short term but does not align with the business need to continue adding workloads.

Deleting workloads (Option C) is not a viable option because the customer wants to add more, not remove them.

Changing the target to 9 months (Option D) does not change the actual resource constraints; it only alters the target timeframe.


Nutanix Prism Central Capacity Planning and Runway Analysis

Nutanix Bible Cluster Resource Management and Scaling

Nutanix Support KB How to Extend Cluster Runway with Resource Scaling

by Leatha at Apr 08, 2025, 01:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-MCI-6.10 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Billy
27 days ago
Changing the target to 9 months? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. The customer already wants a 9-month runway, so B is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Hershel
18 days ago
But what if the customer really needs those new workloads?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daren
1 months ago
I'd love to see the customer's face if we suggested deleting workloads. That's like telling them to do more with less. Option B all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Jani
8 days ago
User 3: Adding resources to the cluster might be the best option to meet the customer's timeframe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
20 days ago
User 2: Definitely, we need to find a solution that works within their budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
29 days ago
User 1: I agree, suggesting to delete workloads would not go over well with the customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felton
2 months ago
That could work too, but adding resources might be more efficient in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
2 months ago
Deleting workloads? That's just creating more problems! The customer wants to add new workloads, not reduce them. B is the clear choice.
upvoted 0 times
Sol
21 days ago
Adding resources to the cluster could also help meet the customer's budgetary timeframe.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 months ago
I agree, deleting workloads is not the solution here. Postponing the start of new workloads seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Boris
2 months ago
Adding resources to the cluster seems like the sensible solution here. The customer needs to maintain a 9-month runway, so B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
The customer needs to maintain a 9-month runway, so B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
21 hours ago
Adding resources to the cluster seems like the sensible solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
3 days ago
B) Postpone the start of new workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
5 days ago
A) Add resources to the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dana
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to postpone the start of new workloads instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
2 months ago
I think we should add resources to the cluster to meet the customer's budgetary timeframe.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel