New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-MCA Exam - Topic 8 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCA exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 8
[All NCP-MCA Questions]

An administrator wants to create two database VMS using replicas and needs to access the same mount_path for hosting the backup files during the deployment on both VMs,

What should the administrator do on the Blueprint to achieve this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Runtime variables are used to pass information between different components of a Blueprint, such as VMs, services, tasks, and replicas. They can be defined in the Blueprint YAML file or in the UI. By setting the mount_path as a runtime variable, the administrator can ensure that both database VMs use the same value for the mount_path during the deployment. This way, the backup files can be hosted on the same location for both VMs.Reference:

Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Automation (NCP-MCA) 6.5 Exam, page 25, section 2.1.1: ''Runtime Variables''

[Nutanix University: NCP-MCA 6.5 Exam Prep - Runtime Variables], video 2: ''Runtime Variables''


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Georgeanna
2 months ago
Surprised that D is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
2 months ago
I think B makes more sense for replicas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 months ago
Option A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
3 months ago
C seems a bit off for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
3 months ago
Definitely A, it's a common practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
3 months ago
I don't recall the specifics, but I have a feeling that runtime replica could be the key to ensuring both VMs access the same backup path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards runtime task, but I feel like I might be mixing it up with another concept we covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to set up shared storage, and I think runtime service could be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
4 months ago
I think setting the mount_path as a runtime variable might be the right approach, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option for replicas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
4 months ago
This is a good question. I'll need to double-check the differences between the options, but I think setting the mount_path as a runtime variable is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
4 months ago
Based on the question, it seems like setting the mount_path as a runtime variable would be the best approach to ensure it's the same for both VMs. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Is the mount_path supposed to be a replica or a task? I'm not sure which option is the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The mount_path needs to be the same for both VMs, so I'll go with setting it as a runtime variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how to set the mount_path for the database VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
10 months ago
I'm going with option B. Replicating the mount_path across VMs is the best way to ensure consistency and accessibility for the backup files.
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
9 months ago
Yes, option B is the best choice for ensuring that the backup files can be easily accessed on both database VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
9 months ago
I agree, having the same mount_path on both VMs will definitely help with consistency and accessibility of the backup files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
9 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Replicating the mount_path will make it easier to access the backup files on both VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosina
10 months ago
Haha, option D as a 'runtime service'? That's a good one! I don't think that's even a real thing. Option B is clearly the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Linn
9 months ago
Definitely, option B is the way to go for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
9 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the correct choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
10 months ago
Option D as a 'runtime service'? That's funny!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emelda
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe setting it as a runtime service could also work. It sounds like it could be related to the deployment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
10 months ago
Option A looks good to me. Using a runtime variable makes the most sense for a configuration setting like this.
upvoted 0 times
Dorcas
8 months ago
Definitely, having it as a runtime variable is the best approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
8 months ago
That's true, it will make it easier to manage and update the mount_path if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
8 months ago
I agree, setting mount_path as a runtime variable will ensure consistency across both VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
9 months ago
Option A looks good to me. Using a runtime variable makes the most sense for a configuration setting like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mireya
10 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Setting the mount_path as a runtime replica ensures that the same mount_path is used across both VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
10 months ago
I agree with Myrtie, setting it as a runtime variable would allow both VMs to access the same mount_path for hosting backup files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
11 months ago
I think the administrator should set mount_path = u01/app/backup as a runtime variable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel