Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-MCA Exam - Topic 8 Question 76 Discussion

Posted by Argelia on Apr 05, 2025 at 04:10 AM

An administrator wants to create two database VMS using replicas and needs to access the same mount_path for hosting the backup files during the deployment on both VMs,

What should the administrator do on the Blueprint to achieve this requirement?

Suggested Answer: A

Runtime variables are used to pass information between different components of a Blueprint, such as VMs, services, tasks, and replicas. They can be defined in the Blueprint YAML file or in the UI. By setting the mount_path as a runtime variable, the administrator can ensure that both database VMs use the same value for the mount_path during the deployment. This way, the backup files can be hosted on the same location for both VMs.Reference:

Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Automation (NCP-MCA) 6.5 Exam, page 25, section 2.1.1: ''Runtime Variables''

[Nutanix University: NCP-MCA 6.5 Exam Prep - Runtime Variables], video 2: ''Runtime Variables''


Get Premium NCP-MCA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
GE
Georgeanna 9 months ago
Surprised that D is even an option here!
YA
Yasuko 10 months ago
I think B makes more sense for replicas.
WI
Willard 10 months ago
Option A is the way to go!
DA
Daron 10 months ago
C seems a bit off for this scenario.
TH
Theodora 10 months ago
Definitely A, it's a common practice.
JU
Juliana 11 months ago
I don't recall the specifics, but I have a feeling that runtime replica could be the key to ensuring both VMs access the same backup path.
BI
Billy 11 months ago
I'm leaning towards runtime task, but I feel like I might be mixing it up with another concept we covered.
TH
Therese 11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to set up shared storage, and I think runtime service could be relevant here.
FR
Franchesca 11 months ago
I think setting the mount_path as a runtime variable might be the right approach, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option for replicas.
DI
Dianne 11 months ago
This is a good question. I'll need to double-check the differences between the options, but I think setting the mount_path as a runtime variable is the way to go.
AN
Angella 12 months ago
Based on the question, it seems like setting the mount_path as a runtime variable would be the best approach to ensure it's the same for both VMs. I'll go with option A.
TA
Tasia 12 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Is the mount_path supposed to be a replica or a task? I'm not sure which option is the right one.
CE
Cecil 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The mount_path needs to be the same for both VMs, so I'll go with setting it as a runtime variable.
YU
Yuonne 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how to set the mount_path for the database VMs.
SH
Sheridan 1 year ago
I'm going with option B. Replicating the mount_path across VMs is the best way to ensure consistency and accessibility for the backup files.
LI
Linwood 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sheridan
Yes, option B is the best choice for ensuring that the backup files can be easily accessed on both database VMs.
MI
Ming 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sheridan
I agree, having the same mount_path on both VMs will definitely help with consistency and accessibility of the backup files.
LI
Lindsey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sheridan
I think option B is the way to go. Replicating the mount_path will make it easier to access the backup files on both VMs.
RO
Rosina 1 year ago
Haha, option D as a 'runtime service'? That's a good one! I don't think that's even a real thing. Option B is clearly the correct answer.
LI
Linn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rosina
Definitely, option B is the way to go for this requirement.
JE
Jennie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rosina
I agree, option B seems like the correct choice here.
MA
Marylin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rosina
Option D as a 'runtime service'? That's funny!
EM
Emelda 1 year ago
I'm not sure, but maybe setting it as a runtime service could also work. It sounds like it could be related to the deployment process.
JA
Jacqueline 1 year ago
Option A looks good to me. Using a runtime variable makes the most sense for a configuration setting like this.
DO
Dorcas 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacqueline
Definitely, having it as a runtime variable is the best approach for this scenario.
EM
Emiko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacqueline
That's true, it will make it easier to manage and update the mount_path if needed.
IL
Ilene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacqueline
I agree, setting mount_path as a runtime variable will ensure consistency across both VMs.
AI
Ailene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacqueline
Option A looks good to me. Using a runtime variable makes the most sense for a configuration setting like this.
MI
Mireya 1 year ago
I think option B is the way to go. Setting the mount_path as a runtime replica ensures that the same mount_path is used across both VMs.
AM
Amos 1 year ago
I agree with Myrtie, setting it as a runtime variable would allow both VMs to access the same mount_path for hosting backup files.
MY
Myrtie 1 year ago
I think the administrator should set mount_path = u01/app/backup as a runtime variable.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel