MENU
When is a non-standalone deployment needed?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium BL0-200 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
FR
Franchesca
6 months ago
D is definitely the best option. It’s all about leveraging existing infrastructure.
MA
Margurite
7 months ago
B seems off. 56 RAN doesn’t relate to 5G services directly.
LE
Leigha
7 months ago
A is interesting. But I feel it’s not the main reason for non-standalone.
JE
Jessenia
7 months ago
C sounds good. Interworking is crucial for smooth transitions.
SA
Salena
7 months ago
I agree with D too. It’s practical for gradual upgrades.
AR
Aretha
7 months ago
Option D makes sense if you're transitioning slowly.
BA
Basilia
8 months ago
I thought 5G was supposed to replace 4G entirely?
GW
Gwenn
8 months ago
Wait, are we really using 4G core for 5G? That seems odd.
SA
Salina
8 months ago
Totally agree, option C is spot on!
KA
Kattie
8 months ago
Wait, there's a 56 RAN now? I'm still trying to figure out 4G and 5G!
VI
Virgina
9 months ago
I'll take the 4G core, hold the 5G. Less confusing that way.
AN
Annice
9 months ago
Hmm, I thought 5G was supposed to be the future, not the past. Guess we're going with the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" approach.
MA
Maia
9 months ago
D) When deploying 5G RAN but want to use 4G core
CR
Cristy
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought non-standalone was mainly for when you need both 4G and 5G to work together, but I can’t recall the exact option.
EL
Elvera
9 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think it was about using 4G for 5G services, which might point to option D again.
YO
Yoko
9 months ago
I remember something about interworking being important, but I’m not sure if that relates to option C or not.
BE
Bernadine
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between 4G RAN and 5G RAN. Do I need to know those details to answer this question? I'm not sure I fully understand the context.
AL
Alaine
10 months ago
Alright, I've got this. A non-standalone deployment is needed when you're deploying 5G RAN but want to use the existing 4G core. That's option D, right?
CH
Chan
10 months ago
A non-standalone deployment is needed for interworking between 4G and 5G core.
VE
Veronika
10 months ago
I think a non-standalone deployment is needed when you want to use the 4G core with 5G RAN, so I’m leaning towards option D.
GE
Gerald
10 months ago
C) When you need to have interworking between 4G and 5G core
MA
Maia
11 months ago
I think D is the right choice. Using 4G core makes sense for 5G RAN.
RA
Rana
11 months ago
I think the key here is understanding the relationship between the RAN and the core network. A non-standalone deployment allows you to leverage the 4G core while deploying the new 5G RAN. Option D seems to capture that scenario.
MA
Matt
11 months ago
Okay, let me see. I think it has to do with the interworking between the 4G and 5G core networks. Option C looks promising, but I'll need to double-check the details.
LE
Lezlie
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the key differences between 4G and 5G networks to figure out when a non-standalone deployment would be needed.
AD
Adelle
6 months ago
Yeah, but we can't ignore the importance of C either!
DY
Dyan
6 months ago
True, but D is more about leveraging existing infrastructure.
TA
Tarra
6 months ago
What about C? Interworking is crucial too.
TA
Tammara
6 months ago
I agree, D seems right for that scenario.
BR
Brigette
6 months ago
I think it's D. Using 4G core with 5G RAN makes sense.