Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-C04 Exam - Topic 3 Question 83 Discussion

Posted by Erick on Jun 12, 2025 at 07:54 AM

Which of the following about RSVP-TE is FALSE?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium 4A0-C04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
MO
Moon 10 months ago
C is true, no doubt about it.
DE
Deangelo 10 months ago
I think D is misleading.
BR
Broderick 11 months ago
I agree with Jessenia, A is the odd one out.
TA
Tawanna 11 months ago
Wait, does it really support traffic protection?
JE
Jessenia 11 months ago
A is definitely false.
AM
Amalia 11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option D; I thought RSVP-TE could use different paths rather than just the IGP best path.
RO
Roslyn 11 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question about LSPs and traffic engineering constraints before, so I think C is definitely true.
VI
Virgina 12 months ago
I remember studying about CAC in RSVP-TE, so I think option B is true.
FR
Frederick 12 months ago
I think RSVP-TE does support traffic protection, but I'm not sure if it's specifically with IGP equal cost paths.
YV
Yvonne 1 year ago
I've got this! RSVP-TE is all about providing traffic protection and admission control, so option A about IGP equal cost paths is definitely false.
AU
Audria 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. RSVP-TE is designed to set up LSPs that follow a specific path, not the IGP best path. So option D must be the false statement.
PA
Patrick 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know RSVP-TE is used for setting up traffic-engineered LSPs, but I can't remember the specifics about the path selection.
SH
Shawna 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering, so I'm sure it doesn't support IGP equal cost paths.
ST
Staci 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure now. Let's discuss it further.
LA
Lavera 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) It supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
AN
Antonio 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure option C is the one that's false. RSVP-TE definitely supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints, that's like its main purpose.
RI
Ricarda 1 year ago
Haha, this is a classic trick question. Of course option B is false, RSVP-TE is all about CAC to prevent resource overbooking. Duh!
TO
Toi 1 year ago
Hmm, I think option D is false. RSVP-TE allows you to create LSPs that don't follow the IGP best path, that's the whole point of traffic engineering!
HE
Heike 1 year ago
↳ replying to Toi
Yes, RSVP-TE does support LSPs that don't follow the IGP best path.
YA
Yasuko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Toi
I think you're right, option D is false.
EL
Elli 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure option A is false. RSVP-TE doesn't use IGP equal cost paths for traffic protection. It has its own mechanisms for that.
DE
Deangelo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elli
That makes sense, thanks for clarifying!
FR
Frank 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elli
I believe option A is false because RSVP-TE has its own mechanisms for traffic protection.
CA
Callie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elli
So, which option do you think is false then?
CH
Christiane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elli
I think you're right, RSVP-TE doesn't use IGP equal cost paths for traffic protection.
ST
Staci 1 year ago
I think the answer is A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel