Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-C04 Exam - Topic 3 Question 83 Discussion

Which of the following about RSVP-TE is FALSE?
A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
B) It supports CAC to prevent resource overbooking.
C) It supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.
D) It supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.

Nokia 4A0-C04 Exam - Topic 3 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C04 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 3
[All 4A0-C04 Questions]

Which of the following about RSVP-TE is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Moon
7 months ago
C is true, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
7 months ago
I think D is misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
8 months ago
I agree with Jessenia, A is the odd one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
8 months ago
Wait, does it really support traffic protection?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
8 months ago
A is definitely false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option D; I thought RSVP-TE could use different paths rather than just the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
8 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question about LSPs and traffic engineering constraints before, so I think C is definitely true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
9 months ago
I remember studying about CAC in RSVP-TE, so I think option B is true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
9 months ago
I think RSVP-TE does support traffic protection, but I'm not sure if it's specifically with IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
9 months ago
I've got this! RSVP-TE is all about providing traffic protection and admission control, so option A about IGP equal cost paths is definitely false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
9 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. RSVP-TE is designed to set up LSPs that follow a specific path, not the IGP best path. So option D must be the false statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know RSVP-TE is used for setting up traffic-engineered LSPs, but I can't remember the specifics about the path selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering, so I'm sure it doesn't support IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure now. Let's discuss it further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) It supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure option C is the one that's false. RSVP-TE definitely supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints, that's like its main purpose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
1 year ago
Haha, this is a classic trick question. Of course option B is false, RSVP-TE is all about CAC to prevent resource overbooking. Duh!
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option D is false. RSVP-TE allows you to create LSPs that don't follow the IGP best path, that's the whole point of traffic engineering!
upvoted 0 times
Heike
1 year ago
Yes, RSVP-TE does support LSPs that don't follow the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
1 year ago
I think you're right, option D is false.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elli
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure option A is false. RSVP-TE doesn't use IGP equal cost paths for traffic protection. It has its own mechanisms for that.
upvoted 0 times
Deangelo
1 year ago
That makes sense, thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
1 year ago
I believe option A is false because RSVP-TE has its own mechanisms for traffic protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
1 year ago
So, which option do you think is false then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
1 year ago
I think you're right, RSVP-TE doesn't use IGP equal cost paths for traffic protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Staci
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel