New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-C04 Exam - Topic 3 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C04 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 3
[All 4A0-C04 Questions]

Which of the following about RSVP-TE is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Moon
2 months ago
C is true, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
2 months ago
I think D is misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
3 months ago
I agree with Jessenia, A is the odd one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
3 months ago
Wait, does it really support traffic protection?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
3 months ago
A is definitely false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option D; I thought RSVP-TE could use different paths rather than just the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
4 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question about LSPs and traffic engineering constraints before, so I think C is definitely true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
4 months ago
I remember studying about CAC in RSVP-TE, so I think option B is true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
4 months ago
I think RSVP-TE does support traffic protection, but I'm not sure if it's specifically with IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
4 months ago
I've got this! RSVP-TE is all about providing traffic protection and admission control, so option A about IGP equal cost paths is definitely false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
4 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. RSVP-TE is designed to set up LSPs that follow a specific path, not the IGP best path. So option D must be the false statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know RSVP-TE is used for setting up traffic-engineered LSPs, but I can't remember the specifics about the path selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering, so I'm sure it doesn't support IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure now. Let's discuss it further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
8 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) It supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
8 months ago
I'm pretty sure option C is the one that's false. RSVP-TE definitely supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints, that's like its main purpose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
8 months ago
Haha, this is a classic trick question. Of course option B is false, RSVP-TE is all about CAC to prevent resource overbooking. Duh!
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
8 months ago
Hmm, I think option D is false. RSVP-TE allows you to create LSPs that don't follow the IGP best path, that's the whole point of traffic engineering!
upvoted 0 times
Heike
8 months ago
Yes, RSVP-TE does support LSPs that don't follow the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
8 months ago
I think you're right, option D is false.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elli
8 months ago
I'm pretty sure option A is false. RSVP-TE doesn't use IGP equal cost paths for traffic protection. It has its own mechanisms for that.
upvoted 0 times
Deangelo
7 months ago
That makes sense, thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
7 months ago
I believe option A is false because RSVP-TE has its own mechanisms for traffic protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
8 months ago
So, which option do you think is false then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
8 months ago
I think you're right, RSVP-TE doesn't use IGP equal cost paths for traffic protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Staci
8 months ago
I think the answer is A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel