MENU
Which of the following VPRN topologies must a customer implement to allow a given VRF to include routes from different VPRNs?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
43 comments · newest first
SH
Shoshana
11 months ago
A makes sense, but I wonder if it complicates routing too much.
BI
Billy
11 months ago
I disagree, D seems more flexible with full mesh options.
BR
Brittni
11 months ago
Wait, can you really mix routes from different VPRNs like that?
BR
Brice
11 months ago
I think B is the right answer, just an extranet VPRN.
CE
Cecily
12 months ago
Definitely A, hub and spoke or extranet is the way to go.
GA
Galen
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between the topologies; I thought both hub and spoke and extranet could work, but I’m not confident in my answer.
LU
Luis
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option D because it mentions both full mesh and hub and spoke, which seems like it would cover more scenarios for route inclusion.
AR
Argelia
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about VPRN topologies, and I feel like the hub and spoke model allows for route sharing too, but I can't recall the specifics.
RA
Ranee
1 year ago
I think I remember that extranet VPRNs are used for sharing routes between different customers, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only option.
AP
Apolonia
1 year ago
This is a good test of our VPRN topology knowledge. I'm going to carefully consider each option and think through the specific requirements for allowing a VRF to include routes from different VPRNs. I may need to jot down some notes to work through this systematically.
EL
Elmira
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on my knowledge, the key is that the VPRN topology needs to allow for interconnectivity between the different VPRNs. So the answer is either a hub and spoke or an extranet VPRN, which would enable that cross-VPRN routing. I'll go with option A.
JE
Jerry
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I'm not 100% confident in my understanding of the different VPRN topologies. I'll need to re-read the question and options a few times to make sure I'm on the right track.
EM
Emilio
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward VPRN topology question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the requirements to allow a VRF to include routes from different VPRNs.
JU
Jutta
1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step to make sure I understand.
GR
Gracia
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. If someone can perform with minimal supervision, that suggests they have a good grasp of the material and can apply it independently. So I'm guessing the answer is B, Application.
NI
Nikita
1 year ago
I'm going with option D, but I have to say, this question feels like it's straight out of a networking textbook. Where's the fun in that?
ST
Stephane
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option A, either a hub and spoke or an extranet VPRN.
VE
Vernice
1 year ago
I would go with option C, a hub and spoke VPRN.
AL
Aliza
1 year ago
I agree, it seems like a typical networking question.
JE
Jenelle
1 year ago
I think option D is the best choice.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
Finally, a question that doesn't require a degree in networking to understand! I'm feeling confident about D.
EL
Elinore
1 year ago
I believe it's either A or D as well.
ST
Stefany
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be either A or D.
DO
Dorothy
1 year ago
I think D is the correct answer too.
CA
Caitlin
2 years ago
Option A seems a bit too broad to me. I'm going with D - either a full mesh or a hub and spoke VPRN.
HE
Henriette
1 year ago
Let's go with D then, it seems like the most logical choice for this scenario.
GA
Gaynell
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but D does sound like a good option for implementing the necessary VPRN topology.
CH
Christiane
1 year ago
I agree, D seems like the best choice for allowing routes from different VPRNs.
TE
Terry
1 year ago
Yeah, D makes sense because it covers both scenarios. Good choice.
TR
Tresa
1 year ago
I agree, option A does seem broad. I think D is the better choice.
JA
Jacklyn
1 year ago
I think option A is too broad as well. I'm leaning towards D - either a full mesh or a hub and spoke VPRN.
IN
India
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I was thinking option B, but now I'm leaning towards D. What do you guys think?
CH
Chaya
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might also be D) Either a full mesh or a hub and spoke VPRN, as both allow for routes from different VPRNs to be included.
YU
Yuonne
2 years ago
I agree with Shelton, because in those topologies, routes from different VPRNs can be included in a given VRF.
SH
Shelton
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Either a hub and spoke or an extranet VPRN.
LA
Lajuana
2 years ago
I think option D is the correct answer. A hub and spoke VPRN or a full mesh VPRN would both allow routes from different VPRNs to be included in a single VRF.
MA
Marjory
1 year ago
No, option A would not allow routes from different VPRNs to be included in a single VRF.
AL
Aleta
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also be a valid choice.
IL
Ilona
1 year ago
I agree, a hub and spoke VPRN or a full mesh VPRN would both work.
BR
Brinda
1 year ago
I think option D is the correct answer.
GE
Georgeanna
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) An extranet VPRN could also be a valid option.
RA
Rashad
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Either a full mesh or a hub and spoke VPRN.
AL
Alaine
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Either a hub and spoke or an extranet VPRN.