Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-C02 Exam - Topic 8 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-C02 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 8
[All 4A0-C02 Questions]

Which of the following VPRN topologies must a customer implement to allow a given VRF to include routes from different VPRNs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Earleen at Jul 08, 2024, 01:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shoshana
5 months ago
A makes sense, but I wonder if it complicates routing too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
5 months ago
I disagree, D seems more flexible with full mesh options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
5 months ago
Wait, can you really mix routes from different VPRNs like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
5 months ago
I think B is the right answer, just an extranet VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
6 months ago
Definitely A, hub and spoke or extranet is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between the topologies; I thought both hub and spoke and extranet could work, but I’m not confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because it mentions both full mesh and hub and spoke, which seems like it would cover more scenarios for route inclusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question about VPRN topologies, and I feel like the hub and spoke model allows for route sharing too, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
6 months ago
I think I remember that extranet VPRNs are used for sharing routes between different customers, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
6 months ago
This is a good test of our VPRN topology knowledge. I'm going to carefully consider each option and think through the specific requirements for allowing a VRF to include routes from different VPRNs. I may need to jot down some notes to work through this systematically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on my knowledge, the key is that the VPRN topology needs to allow for interconnectivity between the different VPRNs. So the answer is either a hub and spoke or an extranet VPRN, which would enable that cross-VPRN routing. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I'm not 100% confident in my understanding of the different VPRN topologies. I'll need to re-read the question and options a few times to make sure I'm on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward VPRN topology question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the requirements to allow a VRF to include routes from different VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
7 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step to make sure I understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
7 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If someone can perform with minimal supervision, that suggests they have a good grasp of the material and can apply it independently. So I'm guessing the answer is B, Application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
11 months ago
I'm going with option D, but I have to say, this question feels like it's straight out of a networking textbook. Where's the fun in that?
upvoted 0 times
Stephane
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A, either a hub and spoke or an extranet VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
10 months ago
I would go with option C, a hub and spoke VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
10 months ago
I agree, it seems like a typical networking question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
10 months ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bette
11 months ago
Finally, a question that doesn't require a degree in networking to understand! I'm feeling confident about D.
upvoted 0 times
Elinore
10 months ago
I believe it's either A or D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be either A or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
10 months ago
I think D is the correct answer too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caitlin
1 year ago
Option A seems a bit too broad to me. I'm going with D - either a full mesh or a hub and spoke VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
Henriette
10 months ago
Let's go with D then, it seems like the most logical choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but D does sound like a good option for implementing the necessary VPRN topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
10 months ago
I agree, D seems like the best choice for allowing routes from different VPRNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
11 months ago
Yeah, D makes sense because it covers both scenarios. Good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
11 months ago
I agree, option A does seem broad. I think D is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
11 months ago
I think option A is too broad as well. I'm leaning towards D - either a full mesh or a hub and spoke VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
India
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I was thinking option B, but now I'm leaning towards D. What do you guys think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might also be D) Either a full mesh or a hub and spoke VPRN, as both allow for routes from different VPRNs to be included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
1 year ago
I agree with Shelton, because in those topologies, routes from different VPRNs can be included in a given VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Either a hub and spoke or an extranet VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
1 year ago
I think option D is the correct answer. A hub and spoke VPRN or a full mesh VPRN would both allow routes from different VPRNs to be included in a single VRF.
upvoted 0 times
Marjory
11 months ago
No, option A would not allow routes from different VPRNs to be included in a single VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also be a valid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
11 months ago
I agree, a hub and spoke VPRN or a full mesh VPRN would both work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
11 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgeanna
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) An extranet VPRN could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Either a full mesh or a hub and spoke VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Either a hub and spoke or an extranet VPRN.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel