I think I've got a strategy here. Since the route reflectors have the same cluster-ID, they won't send updates to each other. So the updates should come from the client routers, which means RR1 should receive 2 updates - one from each client. Let me double-check that logic.
I'm a bit confused on this one. With the route reflectors, I'm not sure if the updates would be sent directly to RR1 or if they'd go through some other routers first. I'll need to review my BGP knowledge to figure this out.
Okay, so we have two route reflectors with the same cluster-ID. That means they should treat each other as clients and not send updates back and forth, right? I'm not totally sure how that affects the number of updates received.
Hmm, this looks like a BGP routing question. I'll need to think through the route reflection process and how that impacts the number of updates received.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Floyd
8 days agoLashandra
13 days agoAliza
19 days agoFiliberto
24 days agoBulah
29 days agoMilly
1 month agoNada
1 month agoCarlee
1 month agoLawanda
2 months agoDorian
2 months agoRima
2 months agoLemuel
2 months agoLamar
2 months agoShayne
3 months agoAshlyn
3 months agoLea
3 months agoTwila
3 months agoDominque
3 months agoShawna
4 months ago