I think I've got a strategy here. Since the route reflectors have the same cluster-ID, they won't send updates to each other. So the updates should come from the client routers, which means RR1 should receive 2 updates - one from each client. Let me double-check that logic.
I'm a bit confused on this one. With the route reflectors, I'm not sure if the updates would be sent directly to RR1 or if they'd go through some other routers first. I'll need to review my BGP knowledge to figure this out.
Okay, so we have two route reflectors with the same cluster-ID. That means they should treat each other as clients and not send updates back and forth, right? I'm not totally sure how that affects the number of updates received.
Hmm, this looks like a BGP routing question. I'll need to think through the route reflection process and how that impacts the number of updates received.
Carline
15 days agoPamella
20 days agoYoko
25 days agoReita
1 month agoElouise
1 month agoFloyd
2 months agoLashandra
2 months agoAliza
2 months agoFiliberto
2 months agoBulah
2 months agoMilly
3 months agoNada
3 months agoCarlee
3 months agoLawanda
3 months agoDorian
3 months agoRima
4 months agoLemuel
4 months agoLamar
4 months agoShayne
4 months agoAshlyn
4 months agoLea
5 months agoTwila
5 months agoDominque
5 months agoShawna
5 months agoRasheeda
5 days agoUla
10 days ago