Nokia Exam 4A0-205 Topic 2 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-205 exam

Question #: 42
Topic #: 2

Which mechanisms can be put in place to increase network survivability?

AProtection, where backup resources are pre-allocated and reserved; or restoration, where each trail can be recovered thanks to a 1+1 protection mechanism

BProtection, where backup resources are allocated upon failure; or restoration, where each trail can be recovered thanks to a 1+1 protection mechanism

CProtection, where backup resources are allocated upon failure; or restoration, where backup resources are pre-allocated and reserved

DProtection, where backup resources are pre-allocated and reserved; or restoration, where backup resources are allocated upon failure.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

The CPB (Commissioning Parameter Builder) application is used to generate the commissioning files for a Nokia 1830 Photonic Service Switch (PSS-1). The CPB application allows the user to create multiple commissioning files[1][2], which can be used to configure a variety of different features on the device. The CPB also allows users to view, edit and modify the commissioning files before they are uploaded to the device. The NSP (Network Service Platform) and EPT (Element Provisioning Tool) are used to manage the devices and network elements within the network, but do not generate commissioning files.

by Martina at Oct 20, 2024, 07:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-205 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Leota

2 months ago

Option B seems the most logical to me. Allocating backup resources upon failure for both protection and restoration makes sense in terms of resource utilization.

upvoted 0 times

Rodrigo

21 days ago

I see your point. It's definitely a trade-off between pre-allocation and on-demand allocation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerry

27 days ago

True, but I think allocating resources upon failure is more efficient in terms of resource management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

2 months ago

But what about option A? Pre-allocating and reserving backup resources could also be effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

2 months ago

I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trina

2 months ago

This question is a real head-scratcher! I'm going to have to think about it for a while. Maybe I'll just ask the network admin to fix it for me. (Just kidding, of course!)

upvoted 0 times

...

Erin

2 months ago

I'm leaning towards Option D. Allocating backup resources upon failure for restoration, and pre-allocating them for protection, seems like a good balance between efficiency and reliability.

upvoted 0 times

Gregoria

1 months ago

I think Option C could also work well, with backup resources allocated upon failure and pre-allocated for protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

1 months ago

I agree, Option D seems like a good balance between efficiency and reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

2 months ago

But A makes more sense because pre-allocated backup resources ensure faster recovery.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

2 months ago

Option A seems like the right choice. Pre-allocating backup resources and using a 1+1 protection mechanism sounds like a robust way to increase network survivability.

upvoted 0 times