I practiced a similar question where we had to identify false statements about EVPN configurations, and I feel like it could be option D since it mentions a transport tunnel.
This question requires a good understanding of EVPN concepts. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how the EVPN-IRB is supposed to function in this case.
Alright, this seems straightforward enough. I just need to understand the interface-ful unnumbered model and how it relates to the EVPN-IRB functionality. Then I can confidently select the false statement.
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking which statement is false, so I'll need to analyze each option closely to identify the one that doesn't match the given information.
I'm a bit unsure about the details of EVPN and how the routing table entries should be resolved in this scenario. I'll need to review my notes and try to connect the dots.
Option A is correct. The EVPN-IRB is using the interface-ful unnumbered model, so there must be an MP-BGP session established between the PEs to advertise VPN-IPv4 routes.
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also be false because the MP-BGP session should support the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes, not just VPN-IPv4 routes.
Derrick
5 months agoLatia
5 months agoVicky
5 months agoTammara
5 months agoFidelia
6 months agoCarey
6 months agoLai
6 months agoBuck
6 months agoDick
6 months agoPaulene
6 months agoMose
6 months agoDeane
6 months agoDorothy
6 months agoElouise
7 months agoFlorinda
7 months agoElenora
11 months agoWillis
11 months agoMarsha
10 months agoSharen
10 months agoBelen
11 months agoTamar
11 months agoBonita
11 months agoLouis
11 months agoKenny
10 months agoThea
10 months agoRachael
11 months agoJoana
12 months agoErasmo
10 months agoJestine
10 months agoSabrina
10 months agoCarey
1 year agoLauna
1 year agoCarey
1 year agoLashaunda
1 year agoTalia
1 year agoCurt
1 year ago