I practiced a similar question where we had to identify false statements about EVPN configurations, and I feel like it could be option D since it mentions a transport tunnel.
This question requires a good understanding of EVPN concepts. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how the EVPN-IRB is supposed to function in this case.
Alright, this seems straightforward enough. I just need to understand the interface-ful unnumbered model and how it relates to the EVPN-IRB functionality. Then I can confidently select the false statement.
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking which statement is false, so I'll need to analyze each option closely to identify the one that doesn't match the given information.
I'm a bit unsure about the details of EVPN and how the routing table entries should be resolved in this scenario. I'll need to review my notes and try to connect the dots.
Option A is correct. The EVPN-IRB is using the interface-ful unnumbered model, so there must be an MP-BGP session established between the PEs to advertise VPN-IPv4 routes.
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also be false because the MP-BGP session should support the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes, not just VPN-IPv4 routes.
Derrick
3 months agoLatia
3 months agoVicky
3 months agoTammara
4 months agoFidelia
4 months agoCarey
4 months agoLai
4 months agoBuck
4 months agoDick
5 months agoPaulene
5 months agoMose
5 months agoDeane
5 months agoDorothy
5 months agoElouise
5 months agoFlorinda
5 months agoElenora
9 months agoWillis
9 months agoMarsha
8 months agoSharen
8 months agoBelen
9 months agoTamar
9 months agoBonita
9 months agoLouis
10 months agoKenny
8 months agoThea
9 months agoRachael
9 months agoJoana
10 months agoErasmo
8 months agoJestine
8 months agoSabrina
9 months agoCarey
10 months agoLauna
10 months agoCarey
11 months agoLashaunda
11 months agoTalia
11 months agoCurt
11 months ago