New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-115 Exam - Topic 8 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-115 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 8
[All 4A0-115 Questions]

In the exhibit, the EVPN-IRB is using the interface-ful unnumbered model and is fully operational. Which of the following statements is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Derrick
3 months ago
C seems accurate, overlay index is a common setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
3 months ago
B sounds right, EVPN routes need that session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
3 months ago
Wait, does PE3 really have a routing entry for 10.10.4.0/24?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
4 months ago
I think D is the false one, seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
4 months ago
A is true, MP-BGP sessions are essential for VPN-IPv4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B being false, but I need to double-check what I learned about EVPN route advertisements between PEs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify false statements about EVPN configurations, and I feel like it could be option D since it mentions a transport tunnel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
4 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar, but I can't recall if MAC-OI is specifically mentioned in the context of VPRN entries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
5 months ago
I remember studying the differences between MP-BGP sessions for EVPN and VPRN, but I'm not entirely sure which statement is false here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
5 months ago
This question requires a good understanding of EVPN concepts. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how the EVPN-IRB is supposed to function in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
5 months ago
Alright, this seems straightforward enough. I just need to understand the interface-ful unnumbered model and how it relates to the EVPN-IRB functionality. Then I can confidently select the false statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking which statement is false, so I'll need to analyze each option closely to identify the one that doesn't match the given information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky EVPN question. I'll need to carefully review the information provided in the exhibit and the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the details of EVPN and how the routing table entries should be resolved in this scenario. I'll need to review my notes and try to connect the dots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key is to identify the true statements based on the configuration details provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
9 months ago
I wonder if the EVPN-IRB is using the interface-ful unibrow model instead. That would be a whole different kind of operational challenge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
9 months ago
Option D is correct. The routing table for VPRN 15 on PE3 contains an entry for 10.10.4.0/24 that is resolved using a transport tunnel towards PE4.
upvoted 0 times
Marsha
8 months ago
D) On PE3, the routing table for VPRN 15 contains an entry for 10.10.4.0/24. This entry is resolved using a transport tunnel towards PE4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
8 months ago
C) On PE3, the routing table for VPRN 15 contains an entry for 10.10.1.0/24. This entry is resolved to MAC-OI as an overlay index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
9 months ago
B) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of EVPN routes is established between PEI and PE2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
9 months ago
A) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes is established between PE3 and PE4.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bonita
9 months ago
Option C is correct. The routing table for VPRN 15 on PE3 contains an entry for 10.10.1.0/24 that is resolved to a MAC-OI, which is an overlay index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
10 months ago
Option B is also correct. An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of EVPN routes is established between the PEs.
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
8 months ago
C) On PE3, the routing table for VPRN 15 contains an entry for 10.10.1.0/24. This entry is resolved to MAC-OI as an overlay index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
9 months ago
B) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of EVPN routes is established between PEI and PE2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
9 months ago
A) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes is established between PE3 and PE4.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joana
10 months ago
Option A is correct. The EVPN-IRB is using the interface-ful unnumbered model, so there must be an MP-BGP session established between the PEs to advertise VPN-IPv4 routes.
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
8 months ago
C) On PE3, the routing table for VPRN 15 contains an entry for 10.10.1.0/24. This entry is resolved to MAC-OI as an overlay index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
8 months ago
B) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of EVPN routes is established between PEI and PE2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
9 months ago
A) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes is established between PE3 and PE4.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
10 months ago
Why do you think option B is false?
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the false statement is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
11 months ago
I think the false statement is option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also be false because the MP-BGP session should support the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes, not just VPN-IPv4 routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
11 months ago
I agree with Curt, option D seems incorrect because the routing table entry should not be resolved using a transport tunnel towards PE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
11 months ago
I think the false statement is option D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel