MENU
In the exhibit, the EVPN-IRB is using the interface-ful unnumbered model and is fully operational. Which of the following statements is FALSE?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 4A0-115 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
DE
Derrick
11 months ago
C seems accurate, overlay index is a common setup.
LA
Latia
11 months ago
B sounds right, EVPN routes need that session.
VI
Vicky
11 months ago
Wait, does PE3 really have a routing entry for 10.10.4.0/24?
TA
Tammara
11 months ago
I think D is the false one, seems off.
FI
Fidelia
12 months ago
A is true, MP-BGP sessions are essential for VPN-IPv4.
CA
Carey
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B being false, but I need to double-check what I learned about EVPN route advertisements between PEs.
LA
Lai
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify false statements about EVPN configurations, and I feel like it could be option D since it mentions a transport tunnel.
BU
Buck
1 year ago
I think option C sounds familiar, but I can't recall if MAC-OI is specifically mentioned in the context of VPRN entries.
DI
Dick
1 year ago
I remember studying the differences between MP-BGP sessions for EVPN and VPRN, but I'm not entirely sure which statement is false here.
PA
Paulene
1 year ago
This question requires a good understanding of EVPN concepts. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how the EVPN-IRB is supposed to function in this case.
MO
Mose
1 year ago
Alright, this seems straightforward enough. I just need to understand the interface-ful unnumbered model and how it relates to the EVPN-IRB functionality. Then I can confidently select the false statement.
DE
Deane
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking which statement is false, so I'll need to analyze each option closely to identify the one that doesn't match the given information.
DO
Dorothy
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky EVPN question. I'll need to carefully review the information provided in the exhibit and the answer choices.
EL
Elouise
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about the details of EVPN and how the routing table entries should be resolved in this scenario. I'll need to review my notes and try to connect the dots.
FL
Florinda
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key is to identify the true statements based on the configuration details provided.
EL
Elenora
1 year ago
I wonder if the EVPN-IRB is using the interface-ful unibrow model instead. That would be a whole different kind of operational challenge!
WI
Willis
1 year ago
Option D is correct. The routing table for VPRN 15 on PE3 contains an entry for 10.10.4.0/24 that is resolved using a transport tunnel towards PE4.
MA
Marsha
1 year ago
D) On PE3, the routing table for VPRN 15 contains an entry for 10.10.4.0/24. This entry is resolved using a transport tunnel towards PE4.
SH
Sharen
1 year ago
C) On PE3, the routing table for VPRN 15 contains an entry for 10.10.1.0/24. This entry is resolved to MAC-OI as an overlay index.
BE
Belen
1 year ago
B) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of EVPN routes is established between PEI and PE2.
TA
Tamar
1 year ago
A) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes is established between PE3 and PE4.
BO
Bonita
1 year ago
Option C is correct. The routing table for VPRN 15 on PE3 contains an entry for 10.10.1.0/24 that is resolved to a MAC-OI, which is an overlay index.
LO
Louis
1 year ago
Option B is also correct. An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of EVPN routes is established between the PEs.
KE
Kenny
1 year ago
C) On PE3, the routing table for VPRN 15 contains an entry for 10.10.1.0/24. This entry is resolved to MAC-OI as an overlay index.
TH
Thea
1 year ago
B) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of EVPN routes is established between PEI and PE2.
RA
Rachael
1 year ago
A) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes is established between PE3 and PE4.
JO
Joana
1 year ago
Option A is correct. The EVPN-IRB is using the interface-ful unnumbered model, so there must be an MP-BGP session established between the PEs to advertise VPN-IPv4 routes.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
C) On PE3, the routing table for VPRN 15 contains an entry for 10.10.1.0/24. This entry is resolved to MAC-OI as an overlay index.
JE
Jestine
1 year ago
B) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of EVPN routes is established between PEI and PE2.
SA
Sabrina
1 year ago
A) An MP-BGP session that supports the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes is established between PE3 and PE4.
CA
Carey
2 years ago
Why do you think option B is false?
LA
Launa
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the false statement is option B.
CA
Carey
2 years ago
I think the false statement is option D.
LA
Lashaunda
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also be false because the MP-BGP session should support the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes, not just VPN-IPv4 routes.
TA
Talia
2 years ago
I agree with Curt, option D seems incorrect because the routing table entry should not be resolved using a transport tunnel towards PE.
CU
Curt
2 years ago
I think the false statement is option D.