MENU
Which of the following statements about PE-to-PE MAC address advertisement is FALSE?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 4A0-115 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
44 comments · newest first
SH
Sheridan
11 months ago
Totally agree with you, C is spot on!
NI
Nickole
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about D? I thought type-2 routes were for something else.
GA
Gail
11 months ago
C sounds right to me, one MP-BGP session for all EVIs makes sense.
RO
Rosendo
11 months ago
I think B is the false one, route targets are for import/export, not overlaps.
SI
Simona
12 months ago
A is true, the service distinguisher is definitely part of the update.
SH
Sherita
12 months ago
The statement about advertising locally-learned MAC addresses sounds correct to me, but I wonder if there are exceptions I might have missed in my studies.
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
I feel like the PE using a single MP-BGP session is a tricky one. It seems plausible, but I can't recall if that's always the case.
MA
Marylin
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think route targets are definitely important for handling MAC address overlaps.
TA
Tamra
1 year ago
I think the statement about the service distinguisher being advertised is true, but I'm not entirely sure if it's always included in the MAC/IP EVPN update.
GR
Graham
1 year ago
Ah, I remember this from the lecture. A PE definitely advertises locally-learned MAC addresses to remote PEs using EVPN type-2 routes, so D is the correct answer.
DE
Deeanna
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. I know that PEs use a single MP-BGP session to exchange routes for all EVIs, so I think C is the false statement here.
LA
Lacresha
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if the service distinguisher is advertised with the MAC/IP EVPN update or not. I'll have to think about that one.
GR
Gracia
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. I think the answer is B - route targets are used to uniquely identify routes between EVIs in the case of MAC address overlaps.
SH
Sheron
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward insurance-related question. I'll focus on understanding the key terms like "losses paid" and "outstanding loss reserves" to determine the correct answer.
MA
Mattie
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. Workspace ONE Access provides identity and access management, while Horizon is more focused on virtual desktops. I believe the correct answer is Workspace ONE UEM.
RH
Rhea
1 year ago
This question is a piece of cake! It's like asking a chef if they know how to boil water.
LU
Lucina
1 year ago
D) A PE advertises locally-learned MAC addresses to remote PEs using EVPN type-2 routes.
LI
Lisha
1 year ago
C) A PE uses a single MP-BGP session with a remote peer to exchange the routes for all EVIs.
SE
Selma
1 year ago
B) Route targets are used to uniquely identify routes between EVIS in the case of MAC address overlaps.
AM
Amina
1 year ago
A) The service distinguisher (label or VNI) is advertised with the MAC/IP EVPN update.
LE
Leonida
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure all the options are true, except for the one about remote PES - it's supposed to be remote PEs, not PES.
EL
Elena
1 year ago
Option D is the correct answer. PEs use EVPN type-2 routes to advertise locally-learned MAC addresses.
AR
Art
1 year ago
I didn't know that, thanks for sharing!
RE
Refugia
1 year ago
That's correct!
SE
Serina
1 year ago
D) A PE advertises locally-learned MAC addresses to remote PEs using EVPN type-2 routes.
LE
Lera
1 year ago
Option A is definitely true. The service distinguisher is always advertised with the MAC/IP EVPN update.
ST
Stevie
1 year ago
Yes, a single MP-BGP session is used to exchange routes for all EVIs.
PA
Paola
1 year ago
Route targets are important for avoiding MAC address overlaps.
TY
Tyisha
1 year ago
I agree, option A is definitely true.
KA
Katheryn
2 years ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. A PE uses a single MP-BGP session to exchange routes for all EVIs.
LE
Leatha
1 year ago
You might be right, option B does seem like the false statement. Route targets play a different role in the advertisement.
DA
Darci
1 year ago
I believe option B is the false statement. Route targets are used to uniquely identify routes between EVIs in case of MAC address overlaps.
VE
Vesta
1 year ago
I agree, option A is definitely false. The service distinguisher is not included in the advertisement.
AL
Alva
1 year ago
I think option A is actually false. The service distinguisher is not advertised with the MAC/IP EVPN update.
RI
Rikki
1 year ago
I agree, option A is definitely false. The service distinguisher is not included in the MAC/IP EVPN update.
PU
Pura
1 year ago
I think option A is actually false. The service distinguisher is not advertised with the MAC/IP EVPN update.
SH
Shonda
2 years ago
I see your point, but I still think it's A because the service distinguisher is not advertised with the MAC/IP EVPN update.
PR
Princess
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the false statement is D.
RE
Ressie
2 years ago
I think option B is false. Route targets are used to identify routes between VRFs, not between EVIs.
SK
Skye
1 year ago
That makes sense. Option A seems to be the correct statement.
ST
Stephen
1 year ago
I think option A is true. The service distinguisher is advertised with the MAC/IP EVPN update.
CH
Charlene
1 year ago
So, which option do you think is true then?
RA
Raymon
1 year ago
I agree, option B is false. Route targets are used for VRFs, not EVIs.
SH
Shonda
2 years ago
I think the false statement is A.