Examine the exhibit.

Which of the following statements about the EVPN routes exchanged for EVPN VPWS 2 is TRUE?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 4A0-115 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
HO
Howard
11 months ago
I thought the P flag was always set to 0 in these cases?
JA
Jaime
11 months ago
Totally agree with you, German!
GO
Golda
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the non-zero Layer-2 MTLJ? Seems off.
GE
German
12 months ago
I think option D is the correct one, all PES should advertise that.
DA
Dallas
12 months ago
PEI does advertise an A-D per EVI route with a tag ID of 40.
JA
Janey
1 year ago
I have a vague memory of the P flag being important, but I can't remember if it should be set to I or something else.
LE
Leatha
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option D because I remember that MAC routes usually involve MPLS labels, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.
LE
Lelia
1 year ago
I feel like I saw a similar question about MTLJ in our practice tests, but I can't recall if it was specifically for EVPN VPWS.
CL
Claribel
1 year ago
I think option A might be correct since I remember something about tag IDs in A-D routes, but I'm not entirely sure.
DE
Delila
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Is it asking about the technical implementation, or more about the conceptual workflow? I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand what they're looking for.
CE
Cecilia
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the Startup Panel Administration tab in TIBCO Designer lets you modify the domain membership and user directory, but I'm not sure about the other options. I'll need to double-check the documentation to be certain.
BR
Brynn
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that even though the security mechanisms adhere to the same industry standards, the different vendor technologies could still be incompatible. I'll go with option A.
PH
Phung
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused because I thought JindoFS could use different back ends, but I can't recall the specifics.