Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-114 Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Posted by Eric on Jan 13, 2025 at 06:08 PM

Which of the following statements about BGP peering sessions is FALSE?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 4A0-114 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
AD
Adell 11 months ago
D is correct, different AS numbers are fine for BGP peers.
WA
Wayne 11 months ago
C is definitely false, eBGP can be non-adjacent too.
PR
Providencia 11 months ago
Wait, are you saying eBGP peers can be non-adjacent? That seems off.
MA
Maira 11 months ago
Totally agree, BGP peering is all about that.
JO
Johnna 12 months ago
A is true, they need IP reachability.
LU
Luke 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the AS numbers; I thought they had to be different for eBGP but I can't recall the specifics.
GL
Gladys 1 year ago
eBGP peers must be directly connected, right? I feel like that's a common requirement.
MI
Mireya 1 year ago
I remember something about iBGP allowing non-adjacent peers, but I'm not completely sure if that's always the case.
CL
Clarence 1 year ago
I think BGP peers definitely need IP reachability, so that one seems true.
CE
Cecily 1 year ago
I'm feeling good about this one. I think the answer is B - iBGP peers can be non-adjacent.
BE
Ben 1 year ago
BGP peers can definitely be configured with different AS numbers, so option D is true.
AL
Alita 1 year ago
Okay, I know eBGP peers have to be adjacent, so option C is false.
YA
Yan 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between iBGP and eBGP. I'll have to think through that one.
CL
Clorinda 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure BGP peers need IP reachability between them, so I'll eliminate option A.
CE
Cecily 1 year ago
Hah, if BGP peers had to be directly connected, the internet would be a tangled mess!
LI
Linette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecily
C) eBGP peers have to be adjacent to each other.
SH
Shonda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecily
B) iBGP peers can be non-adjacent.
JU
Jutta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecily
A) BGP peers need IP reachability between them.
IV
Ivory 2 years ago
B is true. iBGP peers can indeed be non-adjacent, as long as they have a path to each other.
CE
Cecily 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ivory
D) BGP peers can be configured with different AS numbers.
TA
Tammi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ivory
C) eBGP peers have to be adjacent to each other.
JA
Jani 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ivory
B) iBGP peers can be non-adjacent.
LE
Leota 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ivory
A) BGP peers need IP reachability between them.
KR
Krystal 2 years ago
I believe the correct answer is C) as well, because eBGP peers can establish peering sessions over long distances.
SH
Sharmaine 2 years ago
C is false. eBGP peers don't have to be directly connected, they can use a transit network.
SH
Shelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
B) iBGP peers can be non-adjacent.
SA
Sabrina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
A) BGP peers need IP reachability between them.
CH
Christa 2 years ago
D is the correct answer. BGP peers can have different AS numbers, that's the whole point of BGP!
LA
Laurena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Christa
D) BGP peers can be configured with different AS numbers.
JU
Justine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Christa
C) eBGP peers have to be adjacent to each other.
MI
Ming 1 year ago
↳ replying to Christa
B) iBGP peers can be non-adjacent.
JO
Jonelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Christa
A) BGP peers need IP reachability between them.
KR
Kristin 2 years ago
I think A is false. BGP peers don't need direct IP reachability, they can use a third-party router to establish the session.
WI
Wilbert 2 years ago
I agree with Mi, because eBGP peers can actually be non-adjacent.
MI
Mi 2 years ago
I think the false statement is C) eBGP peers have to be adjacent to each other.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel