Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-108 Exam - Topic 4 Question 121 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-108 exam

Question #: 121
Topic #: 4

[All 4A0-108 Questions]

Which of the following is NOT a benefit of multicast for delivering data to multiple receivers?

AIts data delivery is more efficient than unicast and broadcast.

CIt suits VoD (Video on Demand) services very well.

BIt is more scalable than unicast and broadcast.

DIt suits BTV (Broadcast TV) services very well.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Marge at Jan 25, 2026, 08:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-108 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Percy

24 days ago

Not sure if it's always reliable though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

29 days ago

It also helps with real-time data delivery.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

1 month ago

Wait, isn't multicast only for local networks?

upvoted 0 times

...

Brett

1 month ago

Totally agree, it's super efficient!

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

1 month ago

Multicast reduces bandwidth usage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

2 months ago

Multicast is the data delivery version of a magician - it can do a lot of tricks, but not all of them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hobert

2 months ago

Multicast is the data delivery equivalent of a superhero, but even superheroes have their kryptonite.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desire

2 months ago

Multicast is the Swiss Army knife of data delivery, but even it can't be the perfect tool for every job.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

2 months ago

Multicast is like a one-stop-shop for data delivery, but I guess it has its limitations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

2 months ago

Multicast is great, but it can't do everything!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jimmie

3 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I think the answer might be related to the complexity of setup, but I’m not completely confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlota

3 months ago

I feel like multicast is great for efficiency, but there might be something about reliability that doesn't fit as a benefit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

3 months ago

I remember a practice question about multicast, and I think it mentioned something about scalability being a benefit, but I can't recall what isn't a benefit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audria

4 months ago

I think multicast helps reduce bandwidth, but I'm not sure if it has any downsides that could be considered a benefit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domitila

4 months ago

This is a good question to test our understanding of multicast. I'll start by listing the main benefits and then see which one doesn't fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celia

4 months ago

Ugh, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Multicast seems like a complex topic, and I don't want to overthink it. I'll try to eliminate the options systematically.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvera

4 months ago

Alright, time to put my networking knowledge to the test. I'm pretty confident I can figure out the one non-benefit of multicast if I just focus on the key characteristics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benedict

4 months ago

Okay, let me see. I know multicast is used for efficient data delivery to multiple receivers, but what could be a downside? I'll have to review my notes on the topic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Werner

4 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the pros and cons of multicast to identify the one that's not a benefit.

upvoted 0 times

...