Nokia 4A0-108 Exam - Topic 11 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-108 exam

Question #: 90
Topic #: 11

Click the exhibit.

What is the embedded RP for group FF7E:130:2000:2001:2002:2003::1000? (Please note: the exhibit shows the group-to-RP mapping for your reference only.)

A2000:2001:2002:2003: :1

B2000:2001:2002:2003::3

C2000:2001:2002: :1

D2000:2001:2002::3

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Tom at Jun 24, 2024, 08:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-108 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mickie

3 months ago

Just checked, and it looks like 2000:2001:2002: :1 is correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

3 months ago

Pretty sure it's option D, guys.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marva

3 months ago

Wait, are we sure about that? I thought it was 2000:2001:2002::3 too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandee

4 months ago

I think it's actually 2000:2001:2002: :1, not 3.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tricia

4 months ago

The embedded RP for that group is definitely 2000:2001:2002::3.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jannette

4 months ago

I feel like I should know this, but the "::" notation is throwing me off. I want to say it's option D, but I need to double-check my notes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristal

4 months ago

I think the embedded RP is usually derived from the last few segments, but I can't recall if it should be "::1" or "::3" in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chery

4 months ago

This question feels similar to the practice ones we did on group-to-RP mappings. I think it might be option B, but I could be wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remona

5 months ago

I remember something about the embedded RP, but I'm not sure if it's the last segment or the one before that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vesta

5 months ago

I've got a strategy - I'll start by breaking down the group address and matching each part to the RP mapping. That should help me identify the correct RP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The group address is FF7E:130:2000:2001:2002:2003::1000, so I need to find the corresponding RP in the mapping.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the group-to-RP mapping in the exhibit to determine the embedded RP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dan

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the format of the group address. I'll need to make sure I understand how the different parts of the address correspond to the RP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

5 months ago

I feel like isn't new in HTML5, so I doubt it's in the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hmm, I'm a bit torn on this one. Replacing the current process with something the CIO has used before could work, but I'm not sure that's the best first step. Gaining an understanding of the current state seems like the prudent move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

5 months ago

I think I know this one - the value stream is the sequence of releases that deliver a working product, so I'll go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sunny

5 months ago

I'm not too comfortable with the idea of launching a DoS attack, even if it's for testing purposes. I think I'll try to find a more subtle approach to identify the vulnerabilities without causing any disruption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chery

9 months ago

Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with B, but I'm not 100% confident. Maybe I should have paid more attention in my IPv6 class...

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

9 months ago

Haha, this question is like trying to decipher an ancient hieroglyph! But I think I've got it - the answer is B. The RP must be 2000:2001:2002:2003::3.

upvoted 0 times

...