Leave a message
Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 0d 18h 2m 48s Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia Exam 4A0-107 Topic 10 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-107 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 10
[All 4A0-107 Questions]

A SAP-ingress policy is configured so that ping traffic is classified as FC L1 and mapped to queue 3; however, all traffic is placed in queue 1. What is the most probable reason for this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gail at Nov 22, 2023, 12:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-107 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Janine
8 days ago
This question is like a game of SAP-ingress policy Tetris. I'm going to go with option D - the SAP-ingress policy hasn't been applied. It's like trying to play a video game without pressing the power button, it's just not going to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
10 days ago
I'm feeling a bit stumped on this one. The SAP being shut down is a bit too straightforward, and the ICMP traffic default seems too obvious. I'm going to take a wild guess and say option C - no PIR or CIR configured for queue 3. It's like trying to fill a sieve with water, it's just not going to happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
24 days ago
Ah, the default forwarding class for ICMP being BE is a classic trap. I'm going to go with option D - the SAP-ingress policy hasn't been applied. It's like trying to use a remote control without batteries, it's just not going to work.
upvoted 0 times
Norah
15 hours ago
I agree, without applying the policy, the traffic will not be directed to the correct queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
2 days ago
Option D is correct, the SAP-ingress policy must be applied for the traffic classification to take effect.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
30 days ago
Ooh, the SAP being shut down is an interesting thought, but it feels a bit too easy. I'm leaning towards option C - no PIR or CIR configured for queue 3. It's like trying to store water in a bucket with no bottom.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
15 hours ago
Yeah, it does make sense. Queue 3 needs to have PIR or CIR configured to hold packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
8 days ago
I think you might be onto something with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
11 days ago
Yeah, that does seem like a plausible reason. Maybe we should check the configuration for queue 3 to see if that's the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
12 days ago
I think you might be onto something with option C. It does make sense that queue 3 wouldn't be able to hold any packets without PIR or CIR.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Weldon
1 months ago
That's a good point, but I believe the SAP-ingress policy not being applied is the main issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
1 months ago
Hmm, the default forwarding class for ICMP traffic being BE seems a bit too obvious. I'm going to go with option D - the SAP-ingress policy hasn't been applied. It's like trying to use a coupon without actually applying it at checkout.
upvoted 0 times
Oneida
4 days ago
Good point, it's always important to make sure all configurations are properly applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
9 days ago
Maybe we should double check if the SAP-ingress policy has actually been applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
17 days ago
I think you're right, option D does seem like the most probable reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sue
1 months ago
But could it also be because queue 3 has no PIR or CIR configured, and thus cannot hold any packets?
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
1 months ago
I think the most probable reason is that the SAP-ingress policy has not been applied to the SAP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
a