New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-107 Exam - Topic 10 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-107 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 10
[All 4A0-107 Questions]

A SAP-ingress policy is configured so that ping traffic is classified as FC L1 and mapped to queue 3; however, all traffic is placed in queue 1. What is the most probable reason for this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gail at Nov 22, 2023, 12:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-107 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Raylene
3 months ago
Wait, so queue 3 can't hold packets? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
3 months ago
I doubt it's B, shutting down the SAP seems extreme for just ping traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
3 months ago
But what if the policy just wasn't applied? Option D could be it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
4 months ago
Totally agree with A, can't change that forwarding class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
4 months ago
I think it's option A, ICMP is usually BE by default.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
I feel like the most likely issue is that the ingress policy wasn't applied correctly. That seems to fit with the symptoms described.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where queue configurations were key. If queue 3 has no PIR or CIR, could that really prevent it from holding packets?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
4 months ago
I think if the SAP is shut down, it wouldn't process any traffic at all. So, that could explain why everything ends up in queue 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
5 months ago
I remember something about default forwarding classes, but I'm not sure if ICMP is always BE. Could it be that it can't be changed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
5 months ago
Ah, I see. The key here is to understand the queue configuration. If queue 3 has no PIR or CIR configured, then it won't be able to hold any packets, and they'll end up in the default queue 1. That's probably the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. If the default forwarding class for ICMP traffic is BE, then why would the policy be configured to classify ping traffic as FC L1? That doesn't seem right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
5 months ago
Ah, I think I know what the issue might be. The SAP-ingress policy might not have been applied to the SAP. That would explain why the traffic is not being classified and mapped correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The policy is configured correctly, but the traffic is still not being placed in the right queue. I wonder what could be causing that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the possible reasons carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I thought it was @PostDestroy, but now I'm not sure. I'll have to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
5 months ago
Dictionary attack, for sure. Recognizable words in passwords are just begging to be guessed by an attacker using a pre-made list of common terms. Gotta use something more random and complex to stay secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
5 months ago
I think this question is straightforward. The default capacity license for a VM-Series NGFW deployed from the Google Cloud Platform Marketplace is VM-100, so I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
10 months ago
This question is like a game of SAP-ingress policy Tetris. I'm going to go with option D - the SAP-ingress policy hasn't been applied. It's like trying to play a video game without pressing the power button, it's just not going to work.
upvoted 0 times
Howard
9 months ago
Exactly, it's a crucial step in making sure the traffic is classified and mapped correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
9 months ago
Yeah, without applying the policy, it's like trying to play a game with no controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 months ago
Option D is correct. The SAP-ingress policy needs to be applied for it to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clarinda
10 months ago
I'm feeling a bit stumped on this one. The SAP being shut down is a bit too straightforward, and the ICMP traffic default seems too obvious. I'm going to take a wild guess and say option C - no PIR or CIR configured for queue 3. It's like trying to fill a sieve with water, it's just not going to happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
10 months ago
Ah, the default forwarding class for ICMP being BE is a classic trap. I'm going to go with option D - the SAP-ingress policy hasn't been applied. It's like trying to use a remote control without batteries, it's just not going to work.
upvoted 0 times
Mauricio
9 months ago
Exactly, it's all about ensuring the configurations are properly applied for the desired outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
9 months ago
So, it's like setting up a rule but forgetting to activate it. Makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
9 months ago
I agree, without applying the policy, the traffic will not be directed to the correct queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
10 months ago
Option D is correct, the SAP-ingress policy must be applied for the traffic classification to take effect.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
10 months ago
Ooh, the SAP being shut down is an interesting thought, but it feels a bit too easy. I'm leaning towards option C - no PIR or CIR configured for queue 3. It's like trying to store water in a bucket with no bottom.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
9 months ago
Yeah, it does make sense. Queue 3 needs to have PIR or CIR configured to hold packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
10 months ago
I think you might be onto something with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
10 months ago
Yeah, that does seem like a plausible reason. Maybe we should check the configuration for queue 3 to see if that's the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
10 months ago
I think you might be onto something with option C. It does make sense that queue 3 wouldn't be able to hold any packets without PIR or CIR.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Weldon
11 months ago
That's a good point, but I believe the SAP-ingress policy not being applied is the main issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
11 months ago
Hmm, the default forwarding class for ICMP traffic being BE seems a bit too obvious. I'm going to go with option D - the SAP-ingress policy hasn't been applied. It's like trying to use a coupon without actually applying it at checkout.
upvoted 0 times
Mariko
9 months ago
Let's verify that the SAP-ingress policy is active before jumping to any conclusions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
10 months ago
Good point, it's always important to make sure all configurations are properly applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
10 months ago
Maybe we should double check if the SAP-ingress policy has actually been applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
10 months ago
I think you're right, option D does seem like the most probable reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sue
11 months ago
But could it also be because queue 3 has no PIR or CIR configured, and thus cannot hold any packets?
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
11 months ago
I think the most probable reason is that the SAP-ingress policy has not been applied to the SAP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel