Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 4 Question 107 Discussion

Posted by Alonso on Feb 10, 2025 at 03:04 PM

Click on the exhibit below.

You have been requested to add load balancing across the redundant spoke-SDPs in the network shown. What further configuration is required? (Choose 2)

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
KI
Kina 11 months ago
I’m not sure about that, wouldn’t just one set of SDPs work?
LE
Lettie 11 months ago
Adding SDPs between PE1 and PE3 is a must for proper load distribution.
AL
Alfred 11 months ago
Wait, do we really need an additional management VPLS? Seems unnecessary.
NO
Noemi 11 months ago
I think enabling load balancing in the management VPLS is crucial too!
JU
Judy 12 months ago
You definitely need another set of LSPs for redundancy.
SA
Sanda 12 months ago
I have a hunch that enabling load balancing within the management VPLS is crucial, but I’m uncertain about the specifics of the additional configurations needed.
LA
Lashandra 1 year ago
This question feels familiar; I practiced one similar where we had to enable load balancing in a VPLS. Is that what we need here too?
FE
Felice 1 year ago
I think we might need to create another set of SDPs, but I can't recall if that's the only requirement for load balancing.
IS
Isaac 1 year ago
I remember something about needing additional LSPs for redundancy, but I'm not sure if it's between PE1 and PE3 or PE2 and PE4.
AN
Andra 1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I think I can handle it. I'll need to carefully consider the different configuration options and weigh the pros and cons of each before making my selection. Gotta love these types of exam questions!
VI
Viki 1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. Based on the information provided, I think the key is to add another set of SDPs between the PE routers to create redundancy and enable load balancing. I'll double-check my work, but I'm feeling confident about this.
TO
Tonja 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. The network diagram seems straightforward, but I'm not sure which configuration options would be the best for load balancing the redundant spoke-SDPs. I'll need to think this through carefully.
NA
Nan 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one, but I think I can figure it out. I'll need to carefully review the network diagram and the question to determine the best approach.
PA
Pauline 1 year ago
Looks like the network engineers are playing a game of 'Tetris' with those SDPs. Time to see who can fit the pieces together best!
CA
Carylon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pauline
B) Another set of LSPs between PE1 and PE3 and between PE2 and PE4.
ME
Mertie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pauline
A) An additional management VPLS.
TR
Trina 1 year ago
Oh, come on! I thought we were done with these tricky SDP questions. Alright, time to put on my thinking cap. C and D it is!
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trina
Let's go with C and D then. Time to tackle this tricky SDP configuration.
LA
Lauran 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trina
I agree, adding another set of SDPs and enabling load balancing within the management VPLS should do the trick.
TH
Theola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trina
I think C and D are the correct options for load balancing across the redundant spoke-SDPs.
RU
Rutha 1 year ago
Man, these techs really love throwing curveballs, don't they? Let me see... I'll go with C and D, and hope for the best.
YA
Yaeko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rutha
Bobbye: Fingers crossed for smooth sailing.
BO
Bobbye 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rutha
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Let's hope it works out.
RO
Royal 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rutha
User 1: I think C and D are the way to go.
BA
Barney 1 year ago
Aha, another load balancing question! I've got this one in the bag. B and C are the correct answers, definitely.
RA
Rashad 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barney
User3: Load balancing within the management VPLS is also required.
NI
Nikita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barney
User2: I agree, we need another set of LSPs and SDPs between the PEs.
JI
Jill 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barney
User1: I think B and C are the correct answers.
AL
Alyssa 2 years ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm thinking C and D might be the way to go, but I better double-check my notes just to be sure.
WI
Wilburn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
User 4: Maybe we should consider B as well, just to be safe.
KA
Kathrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
User 3: I'm not sure about D, but C seems like a good choice.
ST
Stefania 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
User 2: I agree, let's double-check our notes to be sure.
TA
Tamala 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
User 1: I think C and D are the correct options.
NO
Noah 2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe we also need to enable load balancing within the management VPLS as option D suggests.
AN
Antione 2 years ago
I agree with Malcolm. That would help in achieving load balancing across the redundant spoke-SDPs.
MA
Malcolm 2 years ago
I think we need to add another set of LSPs between PE1 and PE3 and between PE2 and PE4.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel