Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-104 Exam - Topic 1 Question 95 Discussion

Posted by Kimbery on Mar 07, 2025 at 09:10 AM

Which of the following about VPRN route targets is FALSE?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium 4A0-104 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
ST
Stephaine 11 months ago
So, can someone explain why D is even a statement? Seems odd.
TI
Timothy 11 months ago
Multiple route targets in one update? Totally agree, that's common practice!
NO
Norah 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B? I thought that was a bit off.
VE
Verona 11 months ago
I think option D is misleading, not all VPRNs need route targets.
HO
Hoa 12 months ago
A route target does help identify VRF tables, that's true.
LA
Lavera 12 months ago
I feel like D might be the false one because I thought there were cases where VPRNs could work without explicitly configuring route targets.
JO
Josue 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where multiple route targets were mentioned, and I think C is correct since it makes sense for updates.
YO
Yolande 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about option B; I remember something about VPN-IPv4 prefixes but can't recall if it's directly related to route targets.
TI
Tish 1 year ago
I think route targets are definitely used to identify which VRF a prefix belongs to, so A seems true.
AL
Albert 1 year ago
Ugh, VPRN questions are always tricky for me. I'll have to guess on this one and hope for the best.
NI
Nidia 1 year ago
Okay, I've got a good handle on route targets from my studies. I think I can identify the false statement here.
MO
Mozell 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the details of route targets and how they work with VPRNs. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
LO
Lovetta 1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward VPRN question. I'll read through the options carefully and try to eliminate the false statement.
XU
Xuan 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure option A is false. A route target is used to identify the VRF, not distinguish which one a prefix belongs to.
GL
Glynda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Xuan
I believe the correct answer is D, route targets must be configured for VPRNs.
TR
Truman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Xuan
So, what do you think is the correct answer then?
BE
Berry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Xuan
I think you're right, option A seems to be false.
VI
Virgie 2 years ago
C is the correct answer. Multiple route targets can be part of a single MP-BGP update.
GA
Garry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Virgie
The correct answer is C) Multiple route targets can be part of a single MP-BGP update.
RO
Ronny 1 year ago
↳ replying to Virgie
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying. So, what is the correct answer?
CU
Curt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Virgie
No, that's not correct. The answer is B) A route target appended to an IPv4 prefix produces a VPN-IPv4 prefix.
KA
Karl 1 year ago
↳ replying to Virgie
I think the answer is A) A route target is used to distinguish to which VRF table a prefix belongs.
GE
Gerald 1 year ago
↳ replying to Virgie
No, that's not correct. The answer is C) Multiple route targets can be part of a single MP-BGP update.
LO
Lorriane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Virgie
I think the answer is A) A route target is used to distinguish to which VRF table a prefix belongs.
LU
Luann 2 years ago
Multiple route targets in a single MP-BGP update? That's like trying to fit too many candles on a birthday cake!
VE
Vernell 2 years ago
I believe the correct answer is D) Route targets must be configured for VPRNs because they are essential for VPN routing.
EV
Evangelina 2 years ago
B is correct. A route target appended to an IPv4 prefix produces a VPN-IPv4 prefix.
RY
Ryan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
Yes, exactly. Route targets must be configured for VPRNs, so D is not the false statement.
MI
Michel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
Oh, I see. So, C is false then. Multiple route targets can be part of a single MP-BGP update.
IS
Isabelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
No, that's actually true. The false statement is about multiple route targets in a single MP-BGP update.
ES
Essie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
I think A is false. A route target is used to distinguish to which VRF table a prefix belongs.
AN
Annelle 2 years ago
I think option D is false. Route targets are not mandatory for VPRNs, they are optional.
AF
Afton 2 years ago
I agree with Odette. Route targets are not mandatory for VPRNs.
OD
Odette 2 years ago
I think the false statement is D) Route targets must be configured for VPRNs.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel