Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 5 Question 101 Discussion

What MPLS function should be performed by a router that receives a data packet containing an MPLS label value of 3?
B) Request a new label from the peer that provided this label.
A) A router will never receive a packet containing this label value.
C) Pop the label.
D) PUSH an additional label onto the label stack.
E) Signal a new label to the peer that sent the packet.

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 5 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-103 Questions]

What MPLS function should be performed by a router that receives a data packet containing an MPLS label value of 3?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Hyun at Sep 15, 2024, 01:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Glennis
9 months ago
B seems off, no need to request a new label for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
9 months ago
A router can definitely receive packets with label 3, that's a myth!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
10 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? What if the label is still needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
10 months ago
Totally agree, that's how MPLS works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
C is the right answer, pop the label!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
10 months ago
I feel like pushing an additional label might be relevant in some scenarios, but it seems more likely that the label would just be popped in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether the router would ever receive a packet with that specific label value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to identify label operations, and I think popping is definitely a common function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
11 months ago
I think the router should pop the label, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right term for it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
11 months ago
Pushing an additional label onto the stack seems like the wrong approach here. I think the key is understanding what the label value of 3 represents in this context. Time to focus on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Should the router be requesting a new label from the peer? Or is there some other MPLS function I'm missing? I'll have to review my notes on MPLS label operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is to pop the label. That's the standard action for a router when it receives a packet with a specific label value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
11 months ago
Okay, let's see... A router would never receive a packet with this label value? That doesn't sound right to me. I'll have to rule that one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky MPLS question. I'll need to think carefully about the label value of 3 and what that might mean for the router's actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
1 year ago
I wonder if the router comes with a special 'label popping' button. Wouldn't that be convenient?
upvoted 0 times
Buffy
1 year ago
User 3: Signal a new label to the peer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
1 year ago
User 2: Request a new label from the peer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 year ago
User 1: The router should pop the label.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Levi
1 year ago
Option E? Signaling a new label? What is this, some kind of secret MPLS handshake? I'm sticking with C, the good old-fashioned pop the label approach.
upvoted 0 times
Lashon
1 year ago
Yeah, I think keeping it simple with option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
1 year ago
I agree with you, popping the label seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 year ago
I'm not so sure about that. Maybe signaling a new label is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
1 year ago
I think option C is the way to go. Just pop the label and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elena
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm torn between options C and D. I guess it depends on the specific scenario, but popping the label seems like the more straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 year ago
Wait, a router will never receive a packet with a label value of 3? That's so weird. I'm going to go with option B just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
1 year ago
Option C looks good to me. Popping the label seems like the right thing to do when you receive a packet with a specific label value.
upvoted 0 times
Albert
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, popping the label makes sense in that situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
1 year ago
User 1: I think option C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reta
1 year ago
I believe pushing an additional label onto the stack could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
1 year ago
I agree with Viola, popping the label makes sense for MPLS label value of 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 year ago
I think the router should pop the label.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel