Nokia 4A0-102 Exam - Topic 4 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-102 exam

Question #: 69
Topic #: 4

How is the aggregator attribute handled with 32-bit AS numbers?

AWith the same method and attribute as 16-bit AS numbers.

BWith the same method as 16-bit AS numbers, but using the AS4_Aggregator attribute.

CAggregation is not yet supported with 32-bit AS numbers.

DBy using a dummy value of 23456 in the 16-bit AS aggregator field. This value lets the router know it needs to read the 32-bit AS number that is contained in the nextTLV.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Johnna at Sep 18, 2024, 09:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Maybelle

3 months ago

I agree with B, AS4_Aggregator is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicolette

3 months ago

Wait, is aggregation really not supported for 32-bit? Sounds odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristal

3 months ago

D makes sense, using 23456 as a dummy value is clever.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

4 months ago

I thought it was A, same method as 16-bit?

upvoted 0 times

...

Verdell

4 months ago

It's definitely B, AS4_Aggregator is key for 32-bit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albert

4 months ago

I thought aggregation was supported with 32-bit AS numbers, but now I'm questioning if there are limitations I overlooked during my studies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quinn

4 months ago

I feel like there was a practice question about dummy values in the aggregator field, but I can't remember if it was related to 32-bit AS numbers or something else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albert

4 months ago

I think the AS4_Aggregator attribute is specifically for 32-bit AS numbers, but I can't recall if it replaces or supplements the existing method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

5 months ago

I remember that the aggregator attribute is supposed to work similarly for both 16-bit and 32-bit AS numbers, but I'm not entirely sure how that translates in practice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

5 months ago

Ah, I remember learning about this. The aggregator for 32-bit AS numbers is handled the same way as 16-bit, just with a different attribute. I'm confident B is the right answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeniffer

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got it. The aggregator for 32-bit AS numbers uses the AS4_Aggregator attribute, not the standard aggregator. So the answer is B. Glad I reviewed that before the exam!

upvoted 0 times

...

Onita

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know 32-bit AS numbers work differently, but I can't remember if that applies to the aggregator attribute as well. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

5 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is B, since 32-bit AS numbers use a different attribute for aggregation, but I'll double-check the details just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aide

1 year ago

Haha, option D sounds like the router's way of saying 'Hey, I know this is a 32-bit number, just bear with me here!'

upvoted 0 times

...

Catarina

1 year ago

C looks right to me. Aggregation with 32-bit AS numbers isn't supported yet, so that's the logical answer.

upvoted 0 times

Sharika

1 year ago

That makes sense. So, we just have to wait for support to be added for 32-bit AS numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

1 year ago

Yes, you're correct. Aggregation is not yet supported with 32-bit AS numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Octavio

1 year ago

C looks right to me. Aggregation with 32-bit AS numbers isn't supported yet, so that's the logical answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards D. Using a dummy value to indicate the 32-bit AS number in the next TLV seems like a clever workaround.

upvoted 0 times

Tasia

1 year ago

User 3: Yeah, D seems like the most practical solution for handling the aggregator attribute with 32-bit AS numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordie

1 year ago

Agreed, using a dummy value to point to the actual 32-bit AS number makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamika

1 year ago

I think D is the correct option. It's a smart way to handle 32-bit AS numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

William

1 year ago

I'm not sure about that. I think it might be D) By using a dummy value of 23456 in the 16-bit AS aggregator field.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marleen

1 year ago

I agree with Leanna. It makes sense to use the AS4_Aggregator attribute for 32-bit AS numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leanna

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) With the same method as 16-bit AS numbers, but using the AS4_Aggregator attribute.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

1 year ago

I'm pretty sure it's option B. The 32-bit AS numbers use the same method as 16-bit, but with the AS4_Aggregator attribute.

upvoted 0 times

Audry

1 year ago

Exactly, using the AS4_Aggregator attribute is how the aggregator attribute is handled with 32-bit AS numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ocie

1 year ago

So, it's not the same method as 16-bit AS numbers, but it involves the AS4_Aggregator attribute.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

1 year ago

Yes, that's correct. The AS4_Aggregator attribute is used with 32-bit AS numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucy

1 year ago

I think you're right, option B is the correct one.

upvoted 0 times

...