Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-102 Exam - Topic 4 Question 69 Discussion

How is the aggregator attribute handled with 32-bit AS numbers?
B) With the same method as 16-bit AS numbers, but using the AS4_Aggregator attribute.
A) With the same method and attribute as 16-bit AS numbers.
C) Aggregation is not yet supported with 32-bit AS numbers.
D) By using a dummy value of 23456 in the 16-bit AS aggregator field. This value lets the router know it needs to read the 32-bit AS number that is contained in the nextTLV.

Nokia 4A0-102 Exam - Topic 4 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-102 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 4
[All 4A0-102 Questions]

How is the aggregator attribute handled with 32-bit AS numbers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Johnna at Sep 18, 2024, 09:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Maybelle
9 months ago
I agree with B, AS4_Aggregator is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
9 months ago
Wait, is aggregation really not supported for 32-bit? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
10 months ago
D makes sense, using 23456 as a dummy value is clever.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
10 months ago
I thought it was A, same method as 16-bit?
upvoted 0 times
...
Verdell
10 months ago
It's definitely B, AS4_Aggregator is key for 32-bit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
10 months ago
I thought aggregation was supported with 32-bit AS numbers, but now I'm questioning if there are limitations I overlooked during my studies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
11 months ago
I feel like there was a practice question about dummy values in the aggregator field, but I can't remember if it was related to 32-bit AS numbers or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
11 months ago
I think the AS4_Aggregator attribute is specifically for 32-bit AS numbers, but I can't recall if it replaces or supplements the existing method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
11 months ago
I remember that the aggregator attribute is supposed to work similarly for both 16-bit and 32-bit AS numbers, but I'm not entirely sure how that translates in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
11 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about this. The aggregator for 32-bit AS numbers is handled the same way as 16-bit, just with a different attribute. I'm confident B is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The aggregator for 32-bit AS numbers uses the AS4_Aggregator attribute, not the standard aggregator. So the answer is B. Glad I reviewed that before the exam!
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know 32-bit AS numbers work differently, but I can't remember if that applies to the aggregator attribute as well. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B, since 32-bit AS numbers use a different attribute for aggregation, but I'll double-check the details just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
2 years ago
Haha, option D sounds like the router's way of saying 'Hey, I know this is a 32-bit number, just bear with me here!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 years ago
C looks right to me. Aggregation with 32-bit AS numbers isn't supported yet, so that's the logical answer.
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
2 years ago
That makes sense. So, we just have to wait for support to be added for 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
2 years ago
Yes, you're correct. Aggregation is not yet supported with 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
2 years ago
C looks right to me. Aggregation with 32-bit AS numbers isn't supported yet, so that's the logical answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards D. Using a dummy value to indicate the 32-bit AS number in the next TLV seems like a clever workaround.
upvoted 0 times
Tasia
2 years ago
User 3: Yeah, D seems like the most practical solution for handling the aggregator attribute with 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
2 years ago
Agreed, using a dummy value to point to the actual 32-bit AS number makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
2 years ago
I think D is the correct option. It's a smart way to handle 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it might be D) By using a dummy value of 23456 in the 16-bit AS aggregator field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
2 years ago
I agree with Leanna. It makes sense to use the AS4_Aggregator attribute for 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) With the same method as 16-bit AS numbers, but using the AS4_Aggregator attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure it's option B. The 32-bit AS numbers use the same method as 16-bit, but with the AS4_Aggregator attribute.
upvoted 0 times
Audry
2 years ago
Exactly, using the AS4_Aggregator attribute is how the aggregator attribute is handled with 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
2 years ago
So, it's not the same method as 16-bit AS numbers, but it involves the AS4_Aggregator attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
2 years ago
Yes, that's correct. The AS4_Aggregator attribute is used with 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
2 years ago
I think you're right, option B is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel