New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-100 Exam - Topic 7 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-100 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 7
[All 4A0-100 Questions]

What is the most specific aggregate prefix for the following 4 subnets?

136.160.17.192/29

136.160.17.200/29

136.160.17.208/29

136.160.17.216/29

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tamar at May 05, 2022, 12:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Paulene
4 months ago
I'm not convinced, seems too broad for those ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
4 months ago
C makes sense, covers all those subnets perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
4 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it might be D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
4 months ago
Totally agree, C is the most specific!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
4 months ago
The correct answer is C, 136.160.17.192/27.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
5 months ago
I thought the most specific aggregate would be /28, but now I'm second-guessing if /26 might actually be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
5 months ago
I feel like the /27 could be a contender too, but I can't recall if it includes all the subnets listed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the prefix should cover all the subnets. Maybe it's 136.160.17.192/26?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
5 months ago
I think the answer might be 136.160.17.192/28, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the most specific one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking for the best practice to initiate the renewal process from the lowest level with the least managerial effort. I'm not sure if an IT audit is the most efficient approach in that case. Maybe I should re-read the question more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure B sounds wrong - employers usually want more info than just employment dates when verifying past work history.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel