Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-100 Exam - Topic 5 Question 57 Discussion

Posted by Zona on Aug 22, 2022 at 02:55 AM

What is the most specific aggregate prefix for the following 4 subnets?

100.1.1.4/30

100.1.1.8/30

100.1.1.12/30

100.1.1.16/30

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 4A0-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
AL
Alline 11 months ago
Totally with you on A, it covers all the subnets perfectly!
ER
Eric 12 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this? Seems off to me.
MA
Mauricio 12 months ago
No way, it has to be C, 100.1.1.0/27!
AZ
Azalee 1 year ago
I think B, 100.1.1.0/26, could work too.
LI
Lili 1 year ago
The answer is definitely A, 100.1.1.0/25.
EL
Elmer 1 year ago
I feel like 100.1.1.0/28 could be the answer since it covers all the subnets, but I’m not confident it’s the most specific.
KR
Kris 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about how to determine the aggregate prefix here. Should we be looking at the highest subnet mask?
CA
Carey 1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think we need to look at the subnet ranges carefully to find the right prefix.
KE
Keneth 1 year ago
I think the answer might be 100.1.1.0/26, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the most specific one.
AI
Aileen 1 year ago
This question is tripping me up a bit. I know the independent auditor has to evaluate the internal auditors' work, but I'm not totally clear on the specific reasons they might do that. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through the options.
JA
Jamika 1 year ago
Hmm, the options all seem relevant to managing a custom automation framework. I'll need to carefully consider each one.
MA
Marti 1 year ago
I think the output will be a compilation error because the plus operator is not defined for class B.
TH
Thomasena 1 year ago
I do feel like we were told to generally avoid loops in Solidity to prevent unexpected costs, but I'm not entirely sure if that's always the case.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel