New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-100 Exam - Topic 5 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-100 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-100 Questions]

What is the most specific aggregate prefix for the following 4 subnets?

100.1.1.4/30

100.1.1.8/30

100.1.1.12/30

100.1.1.16/30

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Alline
4 months ago
Totally with you on A, it covers all the subnets perfectly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this? Seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
4 months ago
No way, it has to be C, 100.1.1.0/27!
upvoted 0 times
...
Azalee
4 months ago
I think B, 100.1.1.0/26, could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
4 months ago
The answer is definitely A, 100.1.1.0/25.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
5 months ago
I feel like 100.1.1.0/28 could be the answer since it covers all the subnets, but I’m not confident it’s the most specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about how to determine the aggregate prefix here. Should we be looking at the highest subnet mask?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think we need to look at the subnet ranges carefully to find the right prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
5 months ago
I think the answer might be 100.1.1.0/26, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the most specific one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
5 months ago
This question is tripping me up a bit. I know the independent auditor has to evaluate the internal auditors' work, but I'm not totally clear on the specific reasons they might do that. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
5 months ago
Hmm, the options all seem relevant to managing a custom automation framework. I'll need to carefully consider each one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
5 months ago
I think the output will be a compilation error because the plus operator is not defined for class B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
5 months ago
I do feel like we were told to generally avoid loops in Solidity to prevent unexpected costs, but I'm not entirely sure if that's always the case.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel