MENU
Where field conditions necessitate a substantial change in the approved plans,
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CFPE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
When field conditions necessitate a substantial change in the approved plans, the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) may require revised drawings. This ensures that any modifications still comply with the relevant fire codes and safety standards. The AHJ has the responsibility to ensure that all changes maintain the intended level of safety and that they are accurately documented and reviewed.
26 comments · newest first
MA
Marcos
5 months ago
C seems right too. Applicants should always have updated plans.
NO
Novella
5 months ago
A is clear. Revised drawings help avoid issues later.
BO
Bobbie
6 months ago
I disagree, B makes sense. Sometimes no action is needed.
LE
Lera
6 months ago
I think A is the best choice. AHJ needs updated info.
KI
Kimbery
6 months ago
C is definitely not the case, revised drawings go to the AHJ, not the applicant.
RO
Robt
6 months ago
Really? No action from the AHJ? That seems odd.
RA
Raymon
6 months ago
Wait, B doesn't sound right to me.
DE
Delfina
6 months ago
Totally agree, the AHJ usually requires updates.
JA
James
7 months ago
A is correct, revised drawings are often needed.
JU
Jules
7 months ago
A) revised drawings may be required by the AHJ. Duh, what else would you do? Throw a party?
JA
Jamal
7 months ago
I'm going with A. Trying to sneak by without revised drawings? That's a recipe for disaster.
AR
Ardella
8 months ago
A is the only logical answer here. The AHJ needs to approve any substantial changes to the plans.
KE
Kenneth
8 months ago
Definitely A. Who would even consider not submitting revised drawings? That's just asking for trouble.
BR
Brittni
8 months ago
A) revised drawings may be required by the AHJ.
JO
Jodi
8 months ago
I think it’s important to consider that the AHJ usually has to review changes, so A makes sense, but I’m not 100% confident.
ME
Mertie
8 months ago
I vaguely recall that sometimes no action is needed, but I can't remember if that applies to the AHJ or the applicant.
BE
Bettyann
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like there was a practice question about this where the answer was about the applicant needing to submit something.
PE
Pearlene
9 months ago
I think I remember that if field conditions change, the AHJ might need revised drawings, so A could be right.
RA
Raina
9 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the responsibilities of the different parties involved. The question is asking about what's required, so I'm going to carefully read through the options and try to determine the most accurate one.
FR
Francine
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Does the applicant have to submit the revised drawings, or does the AHJ handle that? I'm not sure if I'm understanding the roles correctly.
VI
Virgilio
9 months ago
I've got this! The answer is A - revised drawings may be required by the AHJ. The AHJ would need to review and approve any significant changes to the original plans.
MI
Mila
9 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about what happens when field conditions require a substantial change to the approved plans. I'm pretty sure the answer has to do with revised drawings, but I'm not sure which option is correct.
EV
Evette
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the roles and responsibilities of the applicant and the AHJ (Authority Having Jurisdiction) in this scenario.
CL
Clorinda
3 months ago
But what if no action is necessary for the applicant?
CO
Coletta
4 months ago
Yeah, the AHJ might require them.
CA
Cassi
5 months ago
I think revised drawings may be needed.