Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope NSK200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 1
[All NSK200 Questions]

Your organization has three main locations with 30.000 hosts in each location. You are planning to deploy Netskope using iPsec tunnels for security.

What are two considerations to make a successful connection in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, C

To deploy Netskope using IPSec tunnels for security in this scenario, two considerations to make a successful connection are C. redundant POPs and D. number of hosts. Redundant POPs are Points of Presence that are geographically distributed data centers that host the Netskope cloud platform. You need to consider redundant POPs to ensure high availability and resiliency of your IPSec tunnels in case of a failure or outage in one of the POPs.You can configure multiple IPSec tunnels from your network to different POPs and use dynamic routing protocols such as BGP to load balance and failover the traffic1. Number of hosts is the number of devices or endpoints that will use the IPSec tunnels to access the cloud services. You need to consider the number of hosts to estimate the bandwidth and throughput requirements of your IPSec tunnels and choose the appropriate POPs that can handle the traffic volume.You can use the Netskope Bandwidth Calculator tool to estimate the bandwidth and throughput based on the number of hosts, locations, and cloud services2. Therefore, options C and D are correct and the other options are incorrect.Reference:IPSec - Netskope Knowledge Portal,Netskope Bandwidth Calculator


by Donette at Jan 27, 2026, 02:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shaniqua
15 days ago
Agree, security policies must be well-defined for each location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
20 days ago
Really? 90,000 hosts? That sounds like a nightmare to manage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
25 days ago
I think redundancy is key for reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
1 month ago
Don't forget about latency issues with IPsec tunnels!
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
1 month ago
Need to ensure proper bandwidth for all those hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 month ago
Wait, 30,000 hosts per location? That's a lot of traffic to monitor and secure. Better have deep pockets!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
2 months ago
Haha, good luck managing all those IPsec tunnels! You'll need a dedicated team of VPN experts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd also consider the reliability and redundancy of the network links between the locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
2 months ago
Don't forget about the number of concurrent connections and the capacity of the Netskope infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
2 months ago
Bandwidth and latency are crucial factors to consider for a successful Netskope deployment with IPsec tunnels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
2 months ago
I wonder if we need to think about redundancy or failover options for the tunnels, since having three locations could complicate things if one goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
2 months ago
Could it also be about the encryption standards used? I feel like we discussed that in a similar practice question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about ensuring proper routing configurations for the tunnels to avoid any connectivity issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
3 months ago
I think one consideration might be the bandwidth requirements for the IPSec tunnels, especially with 30,000 hosts at each location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorcas
4 months ago
This seems like a good opportunity to showcase my network troubleshooting skills. I'd definitely want to do some thorough testing and monitoring to ensure the IPsec tunnels are performing as expected and identify any potential points of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. I know IPsec tunnels are important for secure connections, but I'm not sure what other specific considerations I'd need to keep in mind for a deployment of this scale. Might need to do some research on best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
4 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'd probably start by checking the firewall and network device configurations to make sure they're set up to support the IPsec tunnels. And I'd want to test the connectivity between the locations to identify any potential bottlenecks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
4 months ago
Whoa, 30,000 hosts per location? That's a lot of traffic to manage. I'd definitely want to look into the bandwidth and throughput requirements to ensure the IPsec tunnels can handle the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
4 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd focus on making sure the IPsec tunnels are properly configured and that the network connectivity between the locations is reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel