New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope NSK200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All NSK200 Questions]

You want to prevent a document stored in Google Drive from being shared externally with a public link.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

There are two possible scenarios that would cause the behavior of files containing test data for credit cards not triggering DLP events when uploaded to Dropbox. One scenario is that the DLP rule has the severity threshold set to a value higher than the number of occurrences. This means that the rule will only trigger an event if the number of matches for the sensitive data exceeds the specified threshold. For example, if the rule has a severity threshold of 10 and the file contains only 5 credit card numbers, then no event will be generated. To fix this, you can lower the severity threshold or remove it altogether. The other scenario is that the credit card numbers in your test data are invalid 16-digit numbers. This means that the numbers do not pass the Luhn algorithm check, which is a validation method used by Netskope DLP to detect valid credit card numbers. For example, if the number is 1234-5678-9012-3456, then it is not a valid credit card number and will not be detected by Netskope DLP. To fix this, you can use valid test credit card numbers that pass the Luhn algorithm check. The other options are not valid scenarios for this behavior. The Netskope client is not steering Dropbox traffic is not a valid scenario because there are corresponding page events, which means that the traffic is being steered to Netskope.There is no API protection configured for Dropbox is not a valid scenario because API protection is not required for DLP detection on file uploads, which are handled by real-time protection.Reference:DLP Rule Settings1,Credit Card Number Detection2


by Ryan at Oct 19, 2024, 10:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kimberely
3 months ago
Totally agree, Threat Protection is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
3 months ago
Wait, is there really an API Data Protection policy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
3 months ago
Definitely not the Quarantine option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
4 months ago
I think it's the Threat Protection policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
4 months ago
You can restrict sharing in Google Drive settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
4 months ago
Real-time Protection policy sounds familiar, but I thought that was more about malware than document sharing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
4 months ago
I feel like API Data Protection policy might be the right answer, but I’m a bit confused about how it relates to sharing settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
4 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned Threat Protection policy, but I can't recall if that was specifically for Google Drive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
5 months ago
I think we covered something about preventing external sharing in our last session, but I'm not sure which policy it was.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
5 months ago
I feel pretty good about this one. I think the answer is B, a Threat Protection policy. That sounds like the right tool to lock down external sharing for a document in Google Drive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know we need to prevent external sharing, so I'm leaning towards either B or C. I'll have to review the differences between those two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe the API Data Protection policy could work, but I'm not totally confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
5 months ago
I think the answer is B. A Threat Protection policy seems like the best way to prevent external sharing of a document in Google Drive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
10 months ago
C) API Data Protection policy? I don't think that's the right option for this scenario. Gotta go with B) Threat Protection policy.
upvoted 0 times
Deangelo
10 months ago
I agree, B) Threat Protection policy is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
10 months ago
B) Threat Protection policy is the way to go to prevent external sharing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merlyn
10 months ago
Haha, D) Real-time Protection policy? I wish Google Drive had a feature that could just zap anyone trying to share my documents without permission!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
11 months ago
I was considering A) Quarantine, but that's more for suspicious files, not preventing sharing. B) seems like the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) Threat Protection policy. This allows you to control who can access the document and prevent external sharing.
upvoted 0 times
Santos
10 months ago
Exactly. It gives you more control over who can view the document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
10 months ago
So, we can use Threat Protection policy to restrict external sharing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
10 months ago
Yes, that's correct. It helps prevent unauthorized access to the document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
10 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) Threat Protection policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Heike
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Real-time Protection policy could also work to prevent sharing externally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
11 months ago
I agree with Ernest. Threat Protection policy sounds like the best option to prevent external sharing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) Threat Protection policy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel