MENU
Your customer is migrating all of their applications over to Microsoft 365 and Azure. They have good practices and policies in place (or their inline traffic, but they want to continuously detect reconfigurations and enforce compliance standards.
Which two solutions would satisfy their requirements? (Choose two.)
38 comments · newest first
NG
Ngoc
10 months ago
A is definitely a must-have, but I’m not sold on D.
GR
Grover
11 months ago
I thought B was more relevant for compliance checks?
LI
Lina
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about D? Seems a bit overkill.
BE
Berry
11 months ago
Totally agree, A and D cover all bases!
CR
Cristina
11 months ago
I think A and D are the best picks for compliance.
HE
Hershel
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the differences between these options; I hope I can recall the right ones during the exam!
YU
Yuonne
12 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question similar to this before, and I think Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management might be relevant too.
TI
Tijuana
12 months ago
I think Netskope Continuous Security Assessment could be one of the answers since it focuses on ongoing compliance checks.
TA
Tatum
1 year ago
I remember studying about SaaS security management, but I'm not entirely sure if Netskope's solutions are the best fit for compliance detection.
PA
Patrick
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. What exactly do they mean by "inline traffic"? I'll need to make sure I understand that before selecting the solutions.
CO
Cordelia
1 year ago
Okay, the key here is that the customer wants to continuously detect reconfigurations and enforce compliance standards. I'm thinking Netskope Continuous Security Assessment and Netskope Risk Insights would be the best fit.
CH
Chara
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between these Netskope solutions. I'll need to read the descriptions carefully to determine the best options.
ON
Oneida
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about cloud security solutions. I think I can handle this one.
GR
Gracia
1 year ago
This is a good one. I'm confident that Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management and Netskope Continuous Security Assessment are the two solutions that best meet the customer's requirements.
TA
Tamala
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I know the basics of network troubleshooting, but the Splunk-specific tools are new to me. I'll need to review my notes and make sure I understand how those work before the exam.
GE
Gertude
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. Could the lack of trust also result in reduced customer access to data or issues with service patches and releases? I'll have to think it through carefully.
ME
Meghan
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by all the Aviatrix-specific terminology in this question. I'll need to review my notes on the different Aviatrix features to figure this out.
CO
Cordelia
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I know businesses hold cash and securities for various reasons, but I'm not sure I can confidently identify the one that's not valid. I'll have to think it through step-by-step.
MI
Mickie
2 years ago
True, it provides insights into the cloud risk posture of the customer's environment.
DE
Denae
2 years ago
Netskope Cloud Confidence Index might also be a good option to consider.
KR
Kristofer
2 years ago
Yes, combining both solutions would ensure their applications are secure in Microsoft 365 and Azure.
GR
Graciela
2 years ago
I also suggest Netskope Continuous Security Assessment for enforcing compliance standards.
ER
Erasmo
2 years ago
Agreed, that would help them continuously detect reconfigurations.
CH
Charlene
2 years ago
I think the customer should consider Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management.
AN
Angelo
2 years ago
I personally think C) Netskope Risk Insights could also help enforce compliance standards.
ME
Merilyn
2 years ago
Agreed, but I also believe D) Netskope Continuous Security Assessment would be beneficial for continuous detection.
DA
Darell
2 years ago
I think A) Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management would be a good solution for them.
DE
Della
3 years ago
Haha, the Cloud Confidence Index does sound a bit like a made-up metric, doesn't it? I bet the marketing team came up with that one. Anyway, I think you guys have the right idea. The Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights are the way to go.
PA
Pamela
3 years ago
I'm not so sure about the Netskope Cloud Confidence Index (B). I mean, what does that even mean? Sounds like some marketing fluff to me. Let's stick with the Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights.
AR
Ardella
2 years ago
Let's go with Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights then.
EL
Elenore
2 years ago
Exactly, these two solutions will cover our needs effectively.
AR
Arlette
2 years ago
And Risk Insights will ensure we're enforcing compliance standards.
BL
Blythe
2 years ago
Continuous Security Assessment will help us keep track of any reconfigurations.
LA
Lawrence
2 years ago
Netskope Cloud Confidence Index does sound a bit vague. I think we're better off with the other options.
AL
Aleisha
2 years ago
Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights are definitely more practical solutions.
KA
Kathrine
2 years ago
I agree, let's focus on Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights.
VI
Vinnie
3 years ago
I agree, the Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights seem like the most relevant solutions. The Continuous Security Assessment can continuously monitor for reconfigurations and enforce compliance, while the Risk Insights can provide insights into potential risks and vulnerabilities.
VA
Valentin
3 years ago
Okay, let's take a look at this question. It seems like they want a solution that can detect and enforce compliance for their Microsoft 365 and Azure applications. I think the Netskope Continuous Security Assessment (D) and the Netskope Risk Insights (C) would be the best options here.