Discuss Netskope NSK101 Exam Topic 4 Question 8

What are two reasons why legacy solutions, such as on-premises firewalls and proxies, fail to secure the data and data access compared to Netskope Secure Web Gateway? (Choose two.)

ALegacy solutions are unable to see the user who is trying to access the application.

BThe applications where the data resides are no longer in one central location.

CLegacy solutions do not meet compliance standards.

DThe users accessing this data are not in one central place.

Suggested Answer: B, D

Legacy solutions, such as on-premises firewalls and proxies, fail to secure the data and data access compared to Netskope Secure Web Gateway because they are designed for a perimeter-based security model, where the applications and the users are both within the corporate network. However, with the rise of cloud computing and remote work, this model is no longer valid. The applications where the data resides are no longer in one central location, but distributed across multiple cloud services and regions. The users accessing this data are not in one central place, but working from anywhere, on any device. Legacy solutions cannot provide adequate visibility and control over this dynamic and complex environment, resulting in security gaps and performance issues. Netskope Secure Web Gateway, on the other hand, leverages a cloud-native architecture that provides high-performance and scalable inspection of traffic from any location and device, as well as granular policies and advanced threat and data protection for web and cloud applications.Reference:Netskope Architecture OverviewNetskope Next Gen SWG

Get Premium NSK101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

26 comments · newest first

Valene 10 months ago

D makes sense, users are all over the place these days.

Lauran 11 months ago

C is a big issue too, compliance is key!

Rosina 11 months ago

Wait, are legacy solutions really that outdated?

Bobbye 11 months ago

Totally agree with B! Data is everywhere now.

Barbra 11 months ago

A and B are spot on!

Lettie 12 months ago

I think option D could also be relevant because users are working from various locations now, which legacy systems struggle to manage.

Irma 12 months ago

I feel like compliance issues could be a factor too, but I can't recall if that relates directly to the question. Maybe option C?

Laticia 12 months ago

I’m not entirely sure, but I think option B makes sense since applications are often spread out now, unlike before when everything was centralized.

Lyla 1 year ago

I remember discussing how legacy solutions can't identify users effectively, so I think option A might be one of the answers.

Cathern 1 year ago

This is a good opportunity to demonstrate my knowledge of the limitations of legacy security approaches compared to cloud-based solutions like Netskope. I'll focus on the key points.

Lindsey 1 year ago

I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between the legacy and Netskope solutions before answering.

Denae 1 year ago

Okay, I've got this. The key is understanding how the decentralized nature of modern applications and users impacts the effectiveness of legacy on-premises solutions.

Izetta 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to carefully read through the options and think about how legacy solutions differ from the Netskope solution.

Lelia 1 year ago

This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on the key differences between legacy solutions and Netskope Secure Web Gateway.

Kyoko 1 year ago

This looks like a straightforward MVPN question. I'm pretty sure the answer is D, since the I-PMSI A-D route is used for MVPN auto-discovery and binding within a single AS domain, not for advertising the customer multicast group address.

Rosendo 1 year ago

This looks like a classic cloud infrastructure question. I think the key is to focus on the requirements - fine-grained control of traffic and scaling policies. That points me towards a container-based solution, so I'm leaning towards either Google Kubernetes Engine or Cloud Run.

Elouise 1 year ago

No problem, I've got this. Matrix multiplication is straightforward, just need to follow the steps carefully.

Mozelle 2 years ago

That makes sense, especially in today's regulatory environment.

Dalene 2 years ago

I believe legacy solutions also struggle to meet compliance standards.

Rolland 2 years ago

Exactly, the applications where the data is located are now spread out.

Mozelle 2 years ago

Another reason is that the data access is not centralized anymore, right?

Rolland 2 years ago

I think one reason legacy solutions fail is because they can't see the user trying to access the application.

Luther 2 years ago

That's one reason. Another is that the data is no longer in one central location.

Isidra 2 years ago

↳ replying to Luther

B) The applications where the data resides are no longer in one central location.

Janna 2 years ago

↳ replying to Luther

A) Legacy solutions are unable to see the user who is trying to access the application.

Marnie 2 years ago

Legacy solutions can't see the user accessing the application.

Netskope NSK101 Exam - Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion