What are two reasons why legacy solutions, such as on-premises firewalls and proxies, fail to secure the data and data access compared to Netskope Secure Web Gateway? (Choose two.)
This is a good opportunity to demonstrate my knowledge of the limitations of legacy security approaches compared to cloud-based solutions like Netskope. I'll focus on the key points.
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between the legacy and Netskope solutions before answering.
Okay, I've got this. The key is understanding how the decentralized nature of modern applications and users impacts the effectiveness of legacy on-premises solutions.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to carefully read through the options and think about how legacy solutions differ from the Netskope solution.
This looks like a straightforward MVPN question. I'm pretty sure the answer is D, since the I-PMSI A-D route is used for MVPN auto-discovery and binding within a single AS domain, not for advertising the customer multicast group address.
This looks like a classic cloud infrastructure question. I think the key is to focus on the requirements - fine-grained control of traffic and scaling policies. That points me towards a container-based solution, so I'm leaning towards either Google Kubernetes Engine or Cloud Run.
Valene
3 months agoLauran
3 months agoRosina
3 months agoBobbye
4 months agoBarbra
4 months agoLettie
4 months agoIrma
4 months agoLaticia
4 months agoLyla
5 months agoCathern
5 months agoLindsey
5 months agoDenae
5 months agoIzetta
5 months agoLelia
5 months agoKyoko
5 months agoRosendo
5 months agoElouise
5 months agoMozelle
2 years agoDalene
2 years agoRolland
2 years agoMozelle
2 years agoRolland
2 years agoLuther
2 years agoIsidra
2 years agoJanna
2 years agoMarnie
2 years ago