NetApp NS0-604 Exam - Topic 5 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-604 exam

Question #: 13
Topic #: 5

A customer wants to prevent deletion of volumes and snapshots by a rogue administrator. They do not want an option to assign a trusted storage administrator to delete the snapshot.

Which two solutions should the customer Implement? (Choose two.)

Amulti-admin verification

BSnapLock Enterprise

Crole-based access control

Dtamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

The customer is using 30TB of capacity in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP but only 10TB of this capacity is actively in use. The most cost-efficient solution in this case is to implement data tiering and optimization. Data tiering moves inactive or cold data to lower-cost storage (such as object storage in Azure), while keeping frequently accessed data on higher-performance storage. This strategy allows the customer to reduce costs by only paying for premium storage for the data that is actively in use, while moving less frequently accessed data to a cheaper storage tier.

Storing all data in the premium storage tier (A) would increase costs rather than reduce them. BlueXP backup and recovery (B) is for data protection, not cost optimization. Deploying an additional single-node Cloud Volumes ONTAP instance (D) would increase storage costs rather than optimize them.

by Malcom at Mar 20, 2025, 08:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-604 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Blythe

2 months ago

Role-based access control is essential, no doubt!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nu

3 months ago

Not sure about SnapLock, is it really foolproof?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ailene

3 months ago

Tamperproof snapshots sound cool, but are they really effective?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusa

3 months ago

Multi-admin verification is a must! Can't trust just one person.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deja

3 months ago

Definitely go with SnapLock Enterprise for that extra security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorcas

4 months ago

Tamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies could be the right answer, but I wonder if they really meet the customer's needs for security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

4 months ago

Role-based access control sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it completely prevents deletions or just restricts access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

4 months ago

I remember studying SnapLock Enterprise; it seems like a solid option for preventing deletions.

upvoted 0 times

...

William

4 months ago

I think multi-admin verification might be a good choice, but I'm not entirely sure how it works in practice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecily

4 months ago

Okay, I've got it. The key is that they don't want a trusted admin to be able to delete the snapshots. So multi-admin verification and SnapLock Enterprise are the way to go. Those will ensure that even a trusted admin can't delete the volumes and snapshots on their own.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

5 months ago

Thanks, MikeT. That makes a lot of sense now. I think I've got a good handle on this question. Multi-admin verification and SnapLock Enterprise are the two solutions I'll go with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malinda

5 months ago

This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm thinking the two solutions are multi-admin verification and SnapLock Enterprise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimbery

9 months ago

D) tamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies? That's like trying to stop a bull from charging with a feather duster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anisha

10 months ago

A) multi-admin verification is a great idea! That way, no single admin can delete the snapshots without the approval of another trusted admin.

upvoted 0 times

Aliza

8 months ago

D) Implementing tamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies can add an extra layer of security to prevent deletion by a rogue administrator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

8 months ago

C) role-based access control would also be helpful in preventing unauthorized deletion of volumes and snapshots.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

9 months ago

A) multi-admin verification is a great idea! That way, no single admin can delete the snapshots without the approval of another trusted admin.

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

10 months ago

I'd go with C) role-based access control. That way, we can assign specific permissions to different admins and restrict who can delete the snapshots.

upvoted 0 times

Tesha

9 months ago

I agree, using both C) role-based access control and D) tamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies would provide a strong defense against rogue administrators.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecil

9 months ago

D) tamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies would also be a good solution. It ensures the integrity of the snapshots.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cortney

10 months ago

C) role-based access control is a good choice. It allows us to control who can delete the snapshots.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reena

10 months ago

Hmm, looks like we need to prevent rogue admins from deleting volumes and snapshots. B) SnapLock Enterprise seems like the perfect solution to make the snapshots tamper-proof.

upvoted 0 times

...