Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-604 Topic 5 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-604 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 5
[All NS0-604 Questions]

A customer wants to prevent deletion of volumes and snapshots by a rogue administrator. They do not want an option to assign a trusted storage administrator to delete the snapshot.

Which two solutions should the customer Implement? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The customer is using 30TB of capacity in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP but only 10TB of this capacity is actively in use. The most cost-efficient solution in this case is to implement data tiering and optimization. Data tiering moves inactive or cold data to lower-cost storage (such as object storage in Azure), while keeping frequently accessed data on higher-performance storage. This strategy allows the customer to reduce costs by only paying for premium storage for the data that is actively in use, while moving less frequently accessed data to a cheaper storage tier.

Storing all data in the premium storage tier (A) would increase costs rather than reduce them. BlueXP backup and recovery (B) is for data protection, not cost optimization. Deploying an additional single-node Cloud Volumes ONTAP instance (D) would increase storage costs rather than optimize them.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Kimbery
1 months ago
D) tamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies? That's like trying to stop a bull from charging with a feather duster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
1 months ago
A) multi-admin verification is a great idea! That way, no single admin can delete the snapshots without the approval of another trusted admin.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
13 days ago
A) multi-admin verification is a great idea! That way, no single admin can delete the snapshots without the approval of another trusted admin.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Norah
1 months ago
I'd go with C) role-based access control. That way, we can assign specific permissions to different admins and restrict who can delete the snapshots.
upvoted 0 times
Tesha
6 days ago
I agree, using both C) role-based access control and D) tamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies would provide a strong defense against rogue administrators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
26 days ago
D) tamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies would also be a good solution. It ensures the integrity of the snapshots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
1 months ago
C) role-based access control is a good choice. It allows us to control who can delete the snapshots.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reena
2 months ago
Hmm, looks like we need to prevent rogue admins from deleting volumes and snapshots. B) SnapLock Enterprise seems like the perfect solution to make the snapshots tamper-proof.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
2 months ago
I also think tamperproof NetApp Snapshot copies should be implemented to prevent deletion by a rogue administrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
2 months ago
I agree with Carey. Role-based access control can restrict access to only trusted administrators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
2 months ago
I think the customer should implement role-based access control.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel