New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-604 Exam - Topic 1 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-604 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-604 Questions]

A customer is migrating all data from a 6-node, on-premises NetApp FAS cluster to NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. The performance sizing determined that the destination can consolidate to two HA pairs.

What is the minimum number of Cloud Volumes ONTAP Instances required?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The company is migrating data from a 6-node, on-premises NetApp FAS cluster to NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and determined that they can consolidate to two HA pairs. This means that the minimum number of Cloud Volumes ONTAP instances required is 2, as each HA pair corresponds to one instance.

1 instance (A) would not provide the required redundancy and performance, and 6 instances (B) or 4 instances (D) are unnecessary given the performance sizing results.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ivan
3 months ago
I thought it would be more than that, but I guess it makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
3 months ago
Definitely 2, that’s standard for HA pairs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure it’s not 4? Seems a bit low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
4 months ago
Totally agree, 2 is the right call!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
4 months ago
The answer is 2, since they need two HA pairs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards 4 because I thought each HA pair might need its own instance plus some redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
4 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think I practiced one that asked about instances for HA pairs, and it was definitely 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
4 months ago
I remember something about HA pairs needing a minimum of 2 instances, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the case here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
5 months ago
I think we need at least one Cloud Volumes ONTAP instance for each HA pair, so maybe 2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I'm not fully familiar with the specifics of Cloud Volumes ONTAP. I'll have to review the relevant concepts and try to work through the logic step-by-step to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. The current setup is a 6-node on-premises cluster, and the destination is two HA pairs. So I think the minimum number of Cloud Volumes ONTAP Instances required would be 2, one for each HA pair. I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions a 6-node on-premises cluster, but then says the destination can consolidate to two HA pairs. I'm not sure how to interpret that. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Romana
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. The question says the destination can consolidate to two HA pairs, so the answer must be C - 2 Cloud Volumes ONTAP Instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
1 year ago
Wait, are we sure the question is asking about instances and not just the minimum number of nodes? I'm going with B just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Scarlet
1 year ago
C: Yeah, I think C is the correct answer for the minimum number of Cloud Volumes ONTAP Instances required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
1 year ago
B: I agree, I'll also choose C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
1 year ago
A: I think the question is asking about instances, not nodes. I'll go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Almeta
1 year ago
Nah, nah, the answer's gotta be A. One instance is all you need! Simplicity is key, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) 2 as well, it seems like the most logical choice given the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
1 year ago
Hold on, I'm pretty sure the answer is D. Four instances, because... well, just because. Who doesn't love a good quad-stack of Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
upvoted 0 times
Dorthy
1 year ago
A: Hmm, I see your point. But I still think two instances would be sufficient for the consolidation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
1 year ago
B: No way, I'm with the user who said D. Four instances make more sense for the performance sizing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
A: I think the answer is actually C. Two instances should be enough for the migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leeann
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be A) 1 because they are consolidating to two HA pairs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
1 year ago
I agree with Kati, C) 2 makes sense based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the correct answer is B. Six instances, just to be extra safe. You can never have too much cloud, you know!
upvoted 0 times
Virgie
1 year ago
D) 4
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
1 year ago
B) 6
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
1 year ago
C) 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
1 year ago
A) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tori
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. Two HA pairs means two instances, right? Pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Edward
1 year ago
Definitely, the minimum number of Cloud Volumes ONTAP Instances required is 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
1 year ago
Yes, that's correct. It's pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
I agree, the answer is C. Two HA pairs means two instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kati
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) 2 because the performance sizing determined that the destination can consolidate to two HA pairs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel