Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-593 Exam - Topic 9 Question 28 Discussion

Posted by Candida on May 27, 2023 at 10:01 PM

After a normal power down of both nodes for building maintenance, Node01 of a 2-node cluster cannot be powered back up; however, all disk shelves are powered.

Which action should be performed to bring the cluster online and allow Node02 to serve data?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium NS0-593 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
DO
Doyle 11 months ago
D sounds like a last resort, not ideal at all.
BI
Billye 11 months ago
B might work, but it feels risky to bypass optimization.
LI
Lina 11 months ago
Wait, can you really just force a takeover like that?
ST
Stefany 11 months ago
I disagree, A seems more reliable in this case.
CO
Corinne 12 months ago
C is the way to go for a quick fix.
YU
Yuki 12 months ago
Option 4a from the boot menu sounds risky. I hope we don't have to go that route unless absolutely necessary.
KA
Karan 12 months ago
I feel like recreating the cluster is a bit extreme. I thought we usually just took over the failed node instead.
TU
Tu 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about using the reboot command for Node02. It might help in this situation?
NA
Nan 1 year ago
I think we might need to perform a takeover since Node01 isn't coming back up. That sounds familiar from our practice questions.
HO
Howard 1 year ago
Okay, I've reviewed the options, and I think the key is to check the routing and ARP tables on the PE routers to ensure they can communicate with each other. Options A and D seem the most relevant.
AR
Arthur 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the nuances between them before selecting an answer.
KA
Karina 1 year ago
The `!DOCTYPE` declaration is definitely missing a reference to the DTD, so I think D is the correct answer. That's a common HTML5 validation issue.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel