Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-593 Exam - Topic 8 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-593 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 8
[All NS0-593 Questions]

After expanding a two-node AFF A300 cluster with two AFF A700 nodes, you observe latencies when data is accessed indirectly. The system node run -node -command netstat command shows retransmits and packet drops on the LIFs. The AFF A700 nodes with 40 Gbps and the AFF A300 connect with 10 Gbps to the cluster interconnect. You are using Cisco Nexus 3132Q cluster interconnect switches. You just updated to ONTAP 9.8 software.

In this scenario, what is causing this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Lavera at Apr 19, 2023, 01:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-593 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Craig
5 months ago
I thought mixing nodes was fine in the latest ONTAP, guess I was wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
5 months ago
Definitely check the NXOS firmware, could be a simple fix!
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure the adapter card is the problem? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
6 months ago
I think it's more about the node mixing not being supported in 9.8.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
6 months ago
Sounds like a classic speed mismatch issue with the interconnect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
6 months ago
I feel like NXOS firmware mismatches could definitely cause latency issues, but I’m not sure how to verify that in the Interoperability Matrix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
6 months ago
The adapter card issue sounds familiar, but I thought all ports were supported. I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
6 months ago
I think I saw a practice question about node mixing not being supported in ONTAP 9.8, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
6 months ago
I remember something about speed mismatches causing issues, but I'm not sure if it's specifically the 10 Gbps connection that's the problem here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
6 months ago
This seems doable, just need to find the right chart options to reverse the axis. I'll take my time and double-check my work to make sure I get it right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
6 months ago
I think I remember that the profit margin is calculated differently than the mark-up. But I'm not quite sure how to apply that here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
6 months ago
Alright, I've got this. The company is swapping its 7% coupon bonds for a variable rate based on the swap rate quoted by the bank. Since the swap rate is 6.0% - 6.5% fixed against LIBOR, the company's new interest rate profile will be variable at LIBOR + 0.5%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
7 months ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I remember something about using Launches before—it might simplify the process they want?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
11 months ago
Aw, man, they must have forgotten to check the Interoperability Matrix. Classic ONTAP move right there. At least they updated to 9.8, though...that's something, I guess.
upvoted 0 times
Daisy
10 months ago
C) The AFF A300 Is using an adapter card for the cluster Interconnect, but only onboard ports are supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
10 months ago
D) There is an NXOS firmware mismatch, verify in the Interoperability Matrix (1MTJ for a supported version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
10 months ago
A) The 10 Gbps to 10 Gbps cluster Interconnect is creating a speed mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fausto
11 months ago
Firmware mismatch, eh? That's always a pain to troubleshoot. Gotta love it when the cluster interconnect switches don't play nice.
upvoted 0 times
Emogene
10 months ago
D) There is an NXOS firmware mismatch, verify in the Interoperability Matrix (1MTJ for a supported version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
10 months ago
Firmware mismatches can be tricky to resolve, especially with cluster interconnect switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
11 months ago
C) The AFF A300 Is using an adapter card for the cluster Interconnect, but only onboard ports are supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
11 months ago
D) There is an NXOS firmware mismatch, verify in the Interoperability Matrix (1MTJ for a supported version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
11 months ago
A) The 10 Gbps to 10 Gbps cluster Interconnect is creating a speed mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
11 months ago
A) The 10 Gbps to 10 Gbps cluster Interconnect is creating a speed mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wei
11 months ago
Hmm, the adapter card issue could definitely be the culprit here. Looks like they didn't do their homework on the supported configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
12 months ago
I believe we should also check for any NXOS firmware mismatch as mentioned in the Interoperability Matrix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
12 months ago
I agree with Johnna, the 10 Gbps to 10 Gbps cluster Interconnect could be causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
1 year ago
I think the issue might be with the cluster Interconnect speed mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
1 year ago
Mixing node models is never a good idea, especially with a major version upgrade like 9.8. This is probably the root cause of the problem.
upvoted 0 times
Mammie
11 months ago
D) There is an NXOS firmware mismatch, verify in the Interoperability Matrix (1MTJ for a supported version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
11 months ago
C) The AFF A300 Is using an adapter card for the cluster Interconnect, but only onboard ports are supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
12 months ago
A) The 10 Gbps to 10 Gbps cluster Interconnect is creating a speed mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecily
1 year ago
The speed mismatch between the AFF A300 and AFF A700 nodes is definitely causing the latency issues. I'm surprised they didn't catch that during the expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel