Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-593 Exam - Topic 3 Question 83 Discussion

Posted by Sophia on May 06, 2026 at 03:04 PM

Recently, a CIFS SVM was deployed and is working. The customer wants to use the Dynamic DNS (DDNS) capability available in NetApp ONTAP to easily advertise both data UFs to their clients. Currently. DNS is only responding with one data LIF. DDNS is enabled on the domain controllers.

Referring to the exhibit, which two actions should be performed to enable DDNS updates to work? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: B, D

To enable DDNS updates to work, two actions should be performed:

Remove the NFS protocol from the cifs_01 data LIF.This is because DDNS updates are only supported for LIFs that have only one data protocol enabled1. The cifs_01 LIF has both NFS and CIFS protocols enabled, which prevents it from registering its DNS record dynamically. By removing the NFS protocol from the cifs_01 LIF, it will become eligible for DDNS updates.

Enable the -is-enabled parameter for the SVM DDNS services.This is because the -is-enabled parameter controls whether the SVM sends DDNS updates to the DNS servers2. The exhibit shows that the -is-enabled parameter is set to false for the svm1 SVM, which means that it does not send any DDNS updates. By enabling the -is-enabled parameter, the SVM will start sending DDNS updates for its eligible LIFs.Reference:

1: Configure dynamic DNS services3

2: Manage DNS/DDNS services with System Manager4


Get Premium NS0-593 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
24 comments · newest first
MI
Mira 3 days ago
Enabling -use-secure might be a good idea too.
AL
Alexia 8 days ago
Definitely, we should keep that enabled.
AL
Allene 13 days ago
Disabling the -vserver-fqdn could cause issues.
AR
Arminda 18 days ago
Agreed, that’s essential for updates.
AH
Ahmad 24 days ago
I think we need to enable the -is-enabled parameter for DDNS.
CO
Colene 29 days ago
I feel confident about these choices.
RO
Rosalind 1 month ago
Definitely, we need to keep it simple.
ST
Stevie 1 month ago
Let’s focus on the two actions that ensure functionality.
RO
Rosalind 1 month ago
Yeah, that could cause more issues.
CO
Colene 2 months ago
Disabling the -vserver-fqdn doesn’t seem right.
RO
Rosalind 2 months ago
Right, without enabling, nothing works.
ST
Stevie 2 months ago
It’s important too, but I’d prioritize enabling first.
RO
Rosalind 2 months ago
But what about the -use-secure parameter?
CO
Colene 2 months ago
Agreed, that’s crucial for updates.
RO
Rosalind 3 months ago
I think we need to enable the -is-enabled parameter for DDNS.
DY
Dyan 3 months ago
Definitely need to check the DDNS settings on the SVM!
MI
Micah 3 months ago
Wait, why would disabling the -vserver-fqdn help? Sounds odd.
SA
Sarina 3 months ago
Isn't the NFS protocol irrelevant for CIFS SVMs?
MA
Magnolia 3 months ago
Disagree, I think the -use-secure parameter is more important here.
RE
Renea 3 months ago
You need to enable the -is-enabled parameter for DDNS to work.
EL
Elizabeth 4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where enabling the DDNS services was key. I think option D is definitely one of the right answers.
ME
Merrilee 5 months ago
I feel like enabling the -use-secure parameter could be important, but I can't recall the exact implications of that setting.
VI
Vi 5 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think disabling the -vserver-fqdn parameter might be necessary too. It sounds familiar from practice questions.
TR
Tresa 5 months ago
I remember something about needing to enable the -is-enabled parameter for DDNS to work properly. That seems crucial.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel