NetApp Exam NS0-527 Topic 8 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam

Question #: 63
Topic #: 8

Your customer wants to implement a solution to protect only a select number of NFSv3 volumes in a particular aggregate that stores their mission-critical application dat

a. The customer wants the volume's data replicated to secondary storage and have application write operations fail if they cannot be replicated. The customer needs to maintain a zero RPO and a very low RTO.

In this scenario, which solution satisfies these requirements?

ASnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode

BMirrored aggregates using SyncMirror

CSnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode

DMirrored SVMs using MetroCluster

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, D

by Sharee at Oct 24, 2024, 02:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Breana

3 months ago

I'm just impressed the customer knows what RPO and RTO stand for. That's some serious IT lingo right there!

upvoted 0 times

Shannan

1 months ago

C) SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode

upvoted 0 times

...

Isadora

2 months ago

B) Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror

upvoted 0 times

...

Murray

2 months ago

A) SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaclyn

3 months ago

MetroCluster, huh? That's a bit like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight, don't you think? But hey, if the customer wants to go big or go home, why not?

upvoted 0 times

Aracelis

2 months ago

A: Yeah, MetroCluster might be overkill for this scenario, but it's always good to have options for the customer's specific needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mary

2 months ago

B: Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror could also work well for replicating the volume's data to secondary storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dortha

3 months ago

A: SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode sounds like the best fit for maintaining a zero RPO and low RTO.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

3 months ago

SnapMirror Synchronous in StrictSync mode? Now we're talking! That's exactly what the customer needs to protect their mission-critical data. Wouldn't want any write operations to fail, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Chanel

3 months ago

Mirrored aggregates with SyncMirror? That could work, but I'm not sure it's the best fit for this scenario. Might be overkill for just a few volumes.

upvoted 0 times

Chantell

2 months ago

I agree, SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode would be a better fit for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Page

2 months ago

C) SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode

upvoted 0 times

...

Francisca

3 months ago

A) SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode

upvoted 0 times

...

Desiree

3 months ago

SnapMirror Synchronous in Sync mode? Hmm, that sounds like a solid solution to meet the zero RPO and low RTO requirements. Gotta keep that data safe, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

4 months ago

But SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode ensures data replication to secondary storage and application write operations fail if not replicated, meeting the customer's requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

4 months ago

I disagree, Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror might be a better option for maintaining zero RPO and low RTO.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

4 months ago

I think the best solution would be SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode.

upvoted 0 times

...