NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 8 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam

Question #: 63
Topic #: 8

Your customer wants to implement a solution to protect only a select number of NFSv3 volumes in a particular aggregate that stores their mission-critical application dat

a. The customer wants the volume's data replicated to secondary storage and have application write operations fail if they cannot be replicated. The customer needs to maintain a zero RPO and a very low RTO.

In this scenario, which solution satisfies these requirements?

ASnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode

BMirrored aggregates using SyncMirror

CSnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode

DMirrored SVMs using MetroCluster

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, D

by Sharee at Oct 24, 2024, 02:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cherelle

3 months ago

I disagree, SyncMirror is more efficient for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

3 months ago

Zero RPO and low RTO? Sounds like a perfect fit for MetroCluster!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

3 months ago

Wait, isn't StrictSync mode overkill for this?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

4 months ago

I think Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror could work too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashonda

4 months ago

Definitely SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode!

upvoted 0 times

...

Otis

4 months ago

MetroCluster sounds like it could work, but I feel like it might be overkill for just a few NFS volumes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearly

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question where SnapMirror Synchronous was the answer, but I can't recall the differences between Sync and StrictSync modes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shayne

4 months ago

I think Mirrored aggregates with SyncMirror might be a good option, but I need to double-check if they meet the low RTO requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberlie

5 months ago

I remember that SnapMirror Synchronous can provide zero RPO, but I'm not sure if StrictSync is necessary for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

5 months ago

This is a good opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of ONTAP's data protection features. I'll make sure to carefully explain my reasoning for the selected solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alex

5 months ago

I think SnapMirror Synchronous in Sync mode is the way to go here. It should meet the customer's requirements for zero RPO and low RTO, and allow for selective replication of the critical volumes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margarett

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the difference between Sync and StrictSync modes for SnapMirror Synchronous. I'll need to review the documentation to make sure I understand the implications of each.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sommer

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The customer wants zero RPO and low RTO, so that rules out some of the more asynchronous options. I'm leaning towards SnapMirror Synchronous in Sync mode.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around RPO, RTO, and the need for selective replication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Breana

9 months ago

I'm just impressed the customer knows what RPO and RTO stand for. That's some serious IT lingo right there!

upvoted 0 times

Shannan

8 months ago

C) SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode

upvoted 0 times

...

Isadora

9 months ago

B) Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror

upvoted 0 times

...

Murray

9 months ago

A) SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaclyn

10 months ago

MetroCluster, huh? That's a bit like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight, don't you think? But hey, if the customer wants to go big or go home, why not?

upvoted 0 times

Aracelis

8 months ago

A: Yeah, MetroCluster might be overkill for this scenario, but it's always good to have options for the customer's specific needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mary

9 months ago

B: Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror could also work well for replicating the volume's data to secondary storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dortha

9 months ago

A: SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode sounds like the best fit for maintaining a zero RPO and low RTO.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

10 months ago

SnapMirror Synchronous in StrictSync mode? Now we're talking! That's exactly what the customer needs to protect their mission-critical data. Wouldn't want any write operations to fail, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Chanel

10 months ago

Mirrored aggregates with SyncMirror? That could work, but I'm not sure it's the best fit for this scenario. Might be overkill for just a few volumes.

upvoted 0 times

Chantell

9 months ago

I agree, SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode would be a better fit for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Page

9 months ago

C) SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode

upvoted 0 times

...

Francisca

9 months ago

A) SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode

upvoted 0 times

...

Desiree

10 months ago

SnapMirror Synchronous in Sync mode? Hmm, that sounds like a solid solution to meet the zero RPO and low RTO requirements. Gotta keep that data safe, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

10 months ago

But SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode ensures data replication to secondary storage and application write operations fail if not replicated, meeting the customer's requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

11 months ago

I disagree, Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror might be a better option for maintaining zero RPO and low RTO.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

11 months ago

I think the best solution would be SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode.

upvoted 0 times

...