Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 8 Question 49 Discussion

A company has a 4-node FAS9000 fabric MetroCluster cluster separated by 101 km. Site A has an unmirrored HDD aggregate. An FC-VI card fails in one of the nodes in site A and a switchover occurs.Which statement is correct in this scenario?
A) The aggregate is accessible using Site A's surviving node.
B) Only SSD aggregates are accessible.
C) The distance is not supported.
D) The aggregate is accessible using Site B's cluster.

NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 8 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 8
[All NS0-527 Questions]

A company has a 4-node FAS9000 fabric MetroCluster cluster separated by 101 km. Site A has an unmirrored HDD aggregate. An FC-VI card fails in one of the nodes in site A and a switchover occurs.

Which statement is correct in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Haydee at May 19, 2024, 05:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mendy
9 months ago
I’m surprised they can switchover with a failed FC-VI card!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
9 months ago
Wait, 101 km? Is that even supported?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
9 months ago
I think only SSD aggregates would be accessible, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
10 months ago
Definitely agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
10 months ago
The aggregate is accessible using Site A's surviving node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
10 months ago
I believe the correct answer is about accessing the aggregate from Site B's cluster, but I can't quite remember the details of how that works in this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the distance limitation. Wasn't there something about the maximum distance for MetroCluster configurations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
10 months ago
I think we had a similar question in practice about aggregates and failover scenarios. If I recall correctly, the surviving node should still have access to its own aggregates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how aggregates are accessed during a switchover, but I'm not sure if the unmirrored HDD aggregate would still be accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. The distance of 101 km between the sites is mentioned, so I wonder if that could be a factor in accessibility. I'll need to double-check the supported distance for this type of setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the aggregate is accessible using Site A's surviving node. The question states that the aggregate is unmirrored, so it should still be available on the remaining node in Site A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We have a 4-node FAS9000 fabric MetroCluster cluster, and one of the nodes in Site A has an FC-VI card failure, causing a switchover. The key is to determine which site can access the unmirrored HDD aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the details correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
11 months ago
Selecting users with traits similar to the customer personas seems like the obvious choice to me. That way you can get feedback from people who are actually representative of your target market. I don't see the value in testing with users who are completely different.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the applications that are launched using the Start My Day functionality. I'll need to carefully review the information provided in the question and the image to determine which applications the user would see on the desktop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
1 year ago
Wait, what? The distance is not supported? I thought MetroClusters were designed for long-distance failover. Hmm, maybe C is the right answer then.
upvoted 0 times
Marylin
1 year ago
I agree with you, C seems to be the most logical choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think D is the correct answer. The aggregate might be accessible using Site B's cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
1 year ago
I believe A is the correct answer. The aggregate should be accessible using Site A's surviving node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer. The distance might not be supported for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
1 year ago
Haha, this question is a piece of cake! The distance is clearly not an issue, it's just a 'Metro'Cluster after all. I'll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
1 year ago
D is the correct answer. The aggregate is accessible using Site B's cluster since a switchover occurred due to the FC-VI card failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A. The aggregate is accessible using Site A's surviving node. The question doesn't mention anything about SSD aggregates or the distance being unsupported.
upvoted 0 times
Angelyn
1 year ago
Yes, it's important to have a good understanding of how MetroCluster works in different scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
1 year ago
That makes sense, since the switchover occurred in Site A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
1 year ago
I agree, the correct answer is A. The aggregate is accessible using Site A's surviving node.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Orville
1 year ago
But if the switchover occurs in Site A, wouldn't the aggregate be accessible using Site A's surviving node?
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel