Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-527 Topic 8 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 8
[All NS0-527 Questions]

A company has a 4-node FAS9000 fabric MetroCluster cluster separated by 101 km. Site A has an unmirrored HDD aggregate. An FC-VI card fails in one of the nodes in site A and a switchover occurs.

Which statement is correct in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marvel
2 months ago
Wait, what? The distance is not supported? I thought MetroClusters were designed for long-distance failover. Hmm, maybe C is the right answer then.
upvoted 0 times
Marylin
1 months ago
I agree with you, C seems to be the most logical choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D is the correct answer. The aggregate might be accessible using Site B's cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
2 months ago
I believe A is the correct answer. The aggregate should be accessible using Site A's surviving node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
2 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. The distance might not be supported for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
3 months ago
Haha, this question is a piece of cake! The distance is clearly not an issue, it's just a 'Metro'Cluster after all. I'll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
3 months ago
D is the correct answer. The aggregate is accessible using Site B's cluster since a switchover occurred due to the FC-VI card failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is A. The aggregate is accessible using Site A's surviving node. The question doesn't mention anything about SSD aggregates or the distance being unsupported.
upvoted 0 times
Angelyn
1 months ago
Yes, it's important to have a good understanding of how MetroCluster works in different scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
2 months ago
That makes sense, since the switchover occurred in Site A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
2 months ago
I agree, the correct answer is A. The aggregate is accessible using Site A's surviving node.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Orville
4 months ago
But if the switchover occurs in Site A, wouldn't the aggregate be accessible using Site A's surviving node?
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel