Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-527 Topic 7 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 7
[All NS0-527 Questions]

Your manager requires you to protect a production SVM called svm01 by using SVM-DR. Your manager insists that all configuration and data LUNs be replicated to the DR cluster. The destination SVM should be called drsvm01. You set up an SVM-DR relationship between the clusters, specifying that the -- identity- preserve option is set to true. After the initial replication completes, you discover that the iSCSI LIF configuration has not been replicated to drsvm01.

What should you do to solve this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Fabiola
28 days ago
Option D? Really? Adding FC protocol to the destination and configuring the FC LIFs? That's like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight. Overkill much?
upvoted 0 times
Fabiola
9 days ago
B) Manually create and configure the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
11 days ago
A) Run the relationship a second time and check the configuration again.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
1 months ago
Hold on, guys. What about option C? Setting up a new relationship without the -identity-preserve option might be the way to go. It's worth a shot, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 months ago
You know, I was thinking the same thing as Irene. Why go through the trouble of manually configuring everything when you can just try running the relationship again? Option A for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Dustin
1 days ago
Yeah, it's worth a try before resorting to manual configuration on drsvm01.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
7 days ago
I agree, let's give it another shot and see if the iSCSI LIFs get replicated this time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irene
1 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to try running the relationship a second time and see if the issue gets resolved? Option A seems like the safest bet to me.
upvoted 0 times
Major
9 days ago
User 1: I think we should try running the relationship again.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozell
2 months ago
I would go with manually creating and configuring the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01, just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
2 months ago
I agree with Lynda, that seems like the best solution to solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
2 months ago
I think we should run the relationship again and check the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
2 months ago
Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Manually creating and configuring the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01 seems like the quickest and most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Eleni
1 months ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe manually creating and configuring the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01 is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
2 months ago
User 1: I think we should run the relationship a second time and check the configuration again.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
2 months ago
Or we could manually create and configure the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
2 months ago
I agree with Angelo, let's double check the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
2 months ago
I think we should run the relationship a second time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel