NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 7 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam

Question #: 47
Topic #: 7

Your manager requires you to protect a production SVM called svm01 by using SVM-DR. Your manager insists that all configuration and data LUNs be replicated to the DR cluster. The destination SVM should be called drsvm01. You set up an SVM-DR relationship between the clusters, specifying that the -- identity- preserve option is set to true. After the initial replication completes, you discover that the iSCSI LIF configuration has not been replicated to drsvm01.

What should you do to solve this problem?

ARun the relationship a second time and check the configuration again.

BManually create and configure the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01.

CSet up a new relationship without using the -identity-preserve option.

DAdd the FC protocol to the destination and configure the FC LIFs.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Sharika at Apr 26, 2024, 05:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jenelle

6 months ago

I agree, option B seems like the best fix here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

6 months ago

Surprised the iSCSI LIFs didn't replicate, thought that was automatic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caren

6 months ago

Definitely don't set up a new relationship without identity-preserve!

upvoted 0 times

...

Adrianna

7 months ago

Running the relationship again might work, but not sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shakira

7 months ago

I think manually creating the iSCSI LIFs is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willis

7 months ago

I don’t think setting up a new relationship is necessary. It seems like manual configuration is the way to go based on what we studied.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carol

7 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the -identity-preserve option. Does it really affect LIF replication? I feel like I need to double-check that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Soledad

7 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to manually configure LIFs after replication. That might be the right approach here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothea

8 months ago

I remember that iSCSI LIFs might not replicate automatically, but I'm not sure if running the relationship again would help.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamika

8 months ago

Interesting, option D mentions adding the FC protocol. I wonder if there's some additional configuration needed there that could solve the problem. Might be worth exploring that as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

8 months ago

Based on the details provided, I think option A is the safest bet. Running the relationship again and checking the configuration seems like the logical first step to troubleshoot this issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

8 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the identity-preserve option and how that might be impacting the replication. Maybe I should try option C and set up a new relationship without that setting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lanie

8 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the implications of each.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

8 months ago

Okay, let's see here. The question says the iSCSI LIF configuration wasn't replicated, so I'm thinking option B might be the way to go and manually create and configure the LIFs on the destination SVM.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

8 months ago

Okay, let's see. The question is asking what would indicate that the liability should still be recognized as a contingent liability rather than a provision. I think the key is the reliable estimate of the cost.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

8 months ago

I've got a strategy here. Since the question mentions the testing team is having issues with the test and staging instances, the correct URLs should be the ones that can access those specific environments. I'll try to eliminate the options that don't seem relevant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michael

8 months ago

Creating a new slicer connected to the PivotTable seems like the most obvious solution. I'm pretty confident I can do that. The other options seem a bit more complicated, so I'll focus on that first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

1 year ago

Option D? Really? Adding FC protocol to the destination and configuring the FC LIFs? That's like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight. Overkill much?

upvoted 0 times

Eleonora

11 months ago

Option D is definitely overkill in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colette

11 months ago

C) Set up a new relationship without using the -identity-preserve option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

12 months ago

B) Manually create and configure the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raelene

12 months ago

A) Run the relationship a second time and check the configuration again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

1 year ago

Hold on, guys. What about option C? Setting up a new relationship without the -identity-preserve option might be the way to go. It's worth a shot, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

1 year ago

You know, I was thinking the same thing as Irene. Why go through the trouble of manually configuring everything when you can just try running the relationship again? Option A for the win!

upvoted 0 times

Yuriko

11 months ago

I think running the relationship again is the most efficient solution in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dustin

11 months ago

Yeah, it's worth a try before resorting to manual configuration on drsvm01.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

12 months ago

I agree, let's give it another shot and see if the iSCSI LIFs get replicated this time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irene

1 year ago

I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to try running the relationship a second time and see if the issue gets resolved? Option A seems like the safest bet to me.

upvoted 0 times

Eleni

11 months ago

User 3: Agreed, let's give it another shot and check the configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

11 months ago

User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. Let's go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Major

12 months ago

User 1: I think we should try running the relationship again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

1 year ago

I would go with manually creating and configuring the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01, just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennie

1 year ago

I agree with Lynda, that seems like the best solution to solve the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

1 year ago

I think we should run the relationship again and check the configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zachary

1 year ago

Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Manually creating and configuring the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01 seems like the quickest and most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times