NetApp Exam NS0-527 Topic 7 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam

Question #: 47
Topic #: 7

Your manager requires you to protect a production SVM called svm01 by using SVM-DR. Your manager insists that all configuration and data LUNs be replicated to the DR cluster. The destination SVM should be called drsvm01. You set up an SVM-DR relationship between the clusters, specifying that the -- identity- preserve option is set to true. After the initial replication completes, you discover that the iSCSI LIF configuration has not been replicated to drsvm01.

What should you do to solve this problem?

ARun the relationship a second time and check the configuration again.

BManually create and configure the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01.

CSet up a new relationship without using the -identity-preserve option.

DAdd the FC protocol to the destination and configure the FC LIFs.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Sharika at Apr 26, 2024, 05:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Fabiola

3 months ago

Option D? Really? Adding FC protocol to the destination and configuring the FC LIFs? That's like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight. Overkill much?

upvoted 0 times

Eleonora

1 months ago

Option D is definitely overkill in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colette

1 months ago

C) Set up a new relationship without using the -identity-preserve option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

2 months ago

B) Manually create and configure the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raelene

2 months ago

A) Run the relationship a second time and check the configuration again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

3 months ago

Hold on, guys. What about option C? Setting up a new relationship without the -identity-preserve option might be the way to go. It's worth a shot, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

3 months ago

You know, I was thinking the same thing as Irene. Why go through the trouble of manually configuring everything when you can just try running the relationship again? Option A for the win!

upvoted 0 times

Yuriko

2 months ago

I think running the relationship again is the most efficient solution in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dustin

2 months ago

Yeah, it's worth a try before resorting to manual configuration on drsvm01.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

2 months ago

I agree, let's give it another shot and see if the iSCSI LIFs get replicated this time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irene

3 months ago

I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to try running the relationship a second time and see if the issue gets resolved? Option A seems like the safest bet to me.

upvoted 0 times

Eleni

2 months ago

User 3: Agreed, let's give it another shot and check the configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

2 months ago

User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. Let's go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Major

2 months ago

User 1: I think we should try running the relationship again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

4 months ago

I would go with manually creating and configuring the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01, just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennie

4 months ago

I agree with Lynda, that seems like the best solution to solve the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

4 months ago

I think we should run the relationship again and check the configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zachary

4 months ago

Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Manually creating and configuring the iSCSI LIFs on drsvm01 seems like the quickest and most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times