Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp Exam NS0-527 Topic 1 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-527 Questions]

A customer has a 2-node ONTAP Select HA cluster deployed on the same site. The ONTAP Deploy VM has been accidentally deleted. The 2-node ONTAP Select HA cluster is still serving data, but the storage failover capability has been disabled.

In this scenario, what would you do to reestablish the storage failover capability on your cluster?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, E

by Kimi at May 11, 2024, 03:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Selma
29 days ago
Option C? Really? That's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline. Let's just stick to B and call it a day, shall we?
upvoted 0 times
Andree
12 days ago
I agree, option C seems like a risky move.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dana
1 months ago
Option D, all the way! I mean, who doesn't love a good 4-node ONTAP cluster? It's like the Highlander of storage solutions - there can be only one!
upvoted 0 times
Rhea
5 days ago
User 1: Option D, all the way! I mean, who doesn't love a good 4-node ONTAP cluster?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Farrah
1 months ago
Hold up, who deleted the ONTAP Deploy VM in the first place? Sounds like someone needs to brush up on their VM management skills! Option B for the win, I guess.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
2 days ago
Definitely, Option B is the most efficient way to reestablish the storage failover capability on the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
6 days ago
Agreed, deploying a secondary ONTAP Deploy VM and restoring the cluster quorum is the way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
15 days ago
I know right, that's a major mistake! Option B seems like the best solution to restore the storage failover capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theodora
2 months ago
Hmm, I don't know, Option A looks like it might be the safest bet. Migrating the data to a fresh cluster could be a hassle, but at least you'd have full storage failover capability again.
upvoted 0 times
Ilda
6 days ago
In that case, Option A might be the better choice for ensuring data availability and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
11 days ago
That's true, but restoring the cluster quorum might not fully reestablish the storage failover capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
14 days ago
But wouldn't Option B be quicker since you only need to deploy one additional ONTAP Deploy VM?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
15 days ago
I agree, Option A seems like the most reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Migrating the data might be a hassle, but it's worth it for the added security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
1 months ago
User 1: I think Option A is the way to go. It's better to have full storage failover capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesse
2 months ago
Option B seems like the obvious choice here. Why waste time deploying a whole new cluster when you can just restore the quorum with a secondary ONTAP Deploy VM?
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
2 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option A could also work. Deploying two ONTAP Deploy VMs and a new 2-node cluster might be a good way to migrate the data and reestablish storage failover capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
2 months ago
I agree with you, Rikki. Option B seems like the most logical solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Restoring the cluster quorum seems like the most efficient way to reestablish storage failover capability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel