Wait, the destination volume has a capacity limit? I thought SnapVault was like a magical bottomless pit where data just disappeared into the ether. This is outrageous! *mutters* Guess I'll have to go with C, D, and B. *shakes head* Technology these days.
User 2: I know, right? I was surprised too. I think we need to consider the size of the source volume, the rate of data increase, and the number of Snapshot copies to retain on the destination.
Easy peasy! C, D, and B are the ones to go with. Honestly, who would even consider the number of Snapshot copies on the source? That's just a distraction. Now, where's the option for 'all of the above'?
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think the correct answer is B, C, and D. The size of the source volume, the number of Snapshot copies on the destination, and the rate of data increase on the source. Gotta love these subtle SnapVault questions!
I'm going with C, D, and E. The number of Snapshot copies on both the source and destination are crucial, plus the rate of data increase on the source. Autogrow on the source is nice to know, but not as important as those other factors.
Definitely C, D, and B. The number of Snapshot copies on the destination, the rate of data increase on the source, and the size of the source volume are key factors to consider when sizing the destination volume. I can't believe they didn't include that in the options!
Hildred
1 months agoAltha
6 days agoMariann
9 days agoLennie
14 days agoSarina
2 months agoBlossom
2 days agoAlex
3 days agoCary
3 days agoFrancis
7 days agoAlva
14 days agoBrice
29 days agoSherman
1 months agoLura
1 months agoPamella
2 months agoApolonia
2 months agoErick
2 months agoAlaine
28 days agoHuey
1 months agoBrittani
1 months agoLindsey
1 months agoErnie
1 months agoShantay
1 months agoEdwin
1 months agoLeonie
2 months agoLouvenia
2 months agoAmira
2 months agoCorinne
2 months ago