Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-521 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-521 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-521 Questions]

Which feature enables simultaneous snapshots of multiple LUNs In different volumes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Selective LUN Mapping (SLM) is the feature that presents LUNs only within the HA pair. SLM allows administrators to control which LUNs are visible to which hosts, ensuring that LUNs are only accessible through the designated HA pair, thus improving security and manageability.

For more information, see:

NetApp Documentation on Selective LUN Mapping

NetApp Community on LUN Mapping


by Bettina at Dec 06, 2024, 02:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-521 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Herminia
4 months ago
Really? I didn’t know consistency groups did that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
5 months ago
I’ve heard good things about SyncMirror too, but not for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
5 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it was B, failover groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
5 months ago
Totally agree, consistency groups are the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
5 months ago
I think it's C, consistency groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
6 months ago
SyncMirror seems like it could be relevant, but I’m leaning towards consistency groups since they specifically mention simultaneous snapshots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I feel like I’ve seen questions about SnapRestore before, but I don’t recall it being about multiple LUNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
6 months ago
I remember discussing failover groups, but I don't think they relate to snapshots. Consistency groups sound more familiar for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
6 months ago
I think it might be consistency groups, but I'm not entirely sure. We covered something similar in our last practice session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Let me re-read it carefully and consider each option before making a decision. I want to make sure I understand the differences between the features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
6 months ago
Consistency groups! That's the feature that allows you to take coordinated snapshots of multiple LUNs across different volumes. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on data protection features to see if I can recall which one handles this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
6 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the options to determine which one enables simultaneous snapshots of multiple LUNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
11 months ago
Haha, imagine if the answer was SyncMirror. That would be like trying to mirror your snapshots. Talk about a juggling act!
upvoted 0 times
Blair
9 months ago
B) Failover groups might not be the best fit for that situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
9 months ago
D) SyncMirror does seem like it would be a bit of a juggling act.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
10 months ago
C) Consistency groups could also be a good choice for simultaneous snapshots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
10 months ago
A) Single File SnapRestore sounds like a better option for that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hyman
11 months ago
Consistency groups all the way! I bet the developers had a field day coming up with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
11 months ago
Definitely not A or B. Gotta be C or D, but I'm leaning towards C. Consistency groups ftw!
upvoted 0 times
Darell
10 months ago
Let's go with C then. Consistency groups it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
10 months ago
Yeah, I agree. SyncMirror is good too, but consistency groups seem more versatile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
10 months ago
I think it's C too. Consistency groups make the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micheal
11 months ago
Hmm, I think it's C. Consistency groups. Sounds like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
Jina
10 months ago
Yes, consistency groups allow for snapshots of multiple LUNs in different volumes at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
10 months ago
I agree, consistency groups make sense for simultaneous snapshots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
10 months ago
I think it's C. Consistency groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
12 months ago
Consistency groups, of course! Gotta love that synchronized snapshot action.
upvoted 0 times
Stefany
10 months ago
Failover groups are also useful for maintaining high availability in case of a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
10 months ago
I prefer SyncMirror for ensuring data protection across different volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
11 months ago
I agree, consistency groups are great for managing multiple snapshots at once.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think SyncMirror could also be a possible answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 year ago
I agree with Howard, Consistency groups allow for simultaneous snapshots of multiple LUNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Consistency groups.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel