Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp Exam NS0-521 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-521 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-521 Questions]

Which feature enables simultaneous snapshots of multiple LUNs In different volumes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Selective LUN Mapping (SLM) is the feature that presents LUNs only within the HA pair. SLM allows administrators to control which LUNs are visible to which hosts, ensuring that LUNs are only accessible through the designated HA pair, thus improving security and manageability.

For more information, see:

NetApp Documentation on Selective LUN Mapping

NetApp Community on LUN Mapping


by Bettina at Dec 06, 2024, 02:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-521 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Avery
3 months ago
Haha, imagine if the answer was SyncMirror. That would be like trying to mirror your snapshots. Talk about a juggling act!
upvoted 0 times
Blair
23 days ago
B) Failover groups might not be the best fit for that situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
26 days ago
D) SyncMirror does seem like it would be a bit of a juggling act.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
2 months ago
C) Consistency groups could also be a good choice for simultaneous snapshots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
2 months ago
A) Single File SnapRestore sounds like a better option for that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hyman
3 months ago
Consistency groups all the way! I bet the developers had a field day coming up with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
3 months ago
Definitely not A or B. Gotta be C or D, but I'm leaning towards C. Consistency groups ftw!
upvoted 0 times
Darell
1 months ago
Let's go with C then. Consistency groups it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. SyncMirror is good too, but consistency groups seem more versatile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
2 months ago
I think it's C too. Consistency groups make the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micheal
3 months ago
Hmm, I think it's C. Consistency groups. Sounds like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
Jina
2 months ago
Yes, consistency groups allow for snapshots of multiple LUNs in different volumes at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
I agree, consistency groups make sense for simultaneous snapshots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
2 months ago
I think it's C. Consistency groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
3 months ago
Consistency groups, of course! Gotta love that synchronized snapshot action.
upvoted 0 times
Stefany
2 months ago
Failover groups are also useful for maintaining high availability in case of a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
2 months ago
I prefer SyncMirror for ensuring data protection across different volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
I agree, consistency groups are great for managing multiple snapshots at once.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dierdre
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think SyncMirror could also be a possible answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
4 months ago
I agree with Howard, Consistency groups allow for simultaneous snapshots of multiple LUNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) Consistency groups.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel