Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 9 Question 44 Discussion

You are asked to replicate 15 of 20 volumes and the network configuration of your storage virtual machine to your other data center.In this scenario, which NetApp technology should you use?
B) SVM DR and C) MetroCluster
A) SnapMirror Synchronous
D) SVM peering

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 9 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 9
[All NS0-194 Questions]

You are asked to replicate 15 of 20 volumes and the network configuration of your storage virtual machine to your other data center.

In this scenario, which NetApp technology should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Justine at Feb 24, 2023, 12:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-194 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Patrick
10 months ago
I agree, SVM DR seems like the best fit!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
10 months ago
SVM peering doesn’t handle replication like the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
10 months ago
Wait, can you really replicate 15 volumes with SnapMirror Synchronous?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
10 months ago
I think MetroCluster is overkill here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
10 months ago
Definitely SVM DR for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
11 months ago
SVM peering seems like it could work, but I recall it’s more about connecting SVMs rather than replicating data across data centers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
11 months ago
I feel like SnapMirror Synchronous could be the right choice, but I’m confused about whether it’s meant for synchronous replication or just regular.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
11 months ago
I remember practicing a question about MetroCluster, but I don't think it fits this scenario since we only need to replicate some volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
11 months ago
I think we might need to use SVM DR for replicating the volumes, but I'm not entirely sure if it covers the network configuration too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the "Entire grid" option would meet the requirement of iterating through all combinations, but it might be too resource-intensive. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of the other choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
11 months ago
I've got a good strategy for this type of question. I'll carefully examine the details and eliminate the incorrect options to find the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The most probable reason is that the IP-match criteria has been misconfigured for the ICMP traffic, causing it to be placed in the default queue instead of the expected queue 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
11 months ago
Okay, let me see. I remember something about GUI editors being limited to the default browser or maybe a couple of installed browsers. I'll have to read the options carefully to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
SVM DR is the answer, no doubt. It's like the Uber of storage replication - gets the job done without all the unnecessary bells and whistles.
upvoted 0 times
Kristin
1 year ago
True, SVM DR is like the Uber of storage replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
1 year ago
SnapMirror Synchronous could work too, but SVM DR is more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
1 year ago
I agree, it's simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
1 year ago
SVM DR is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ma
1 year ago
SnapMirror Synchronous? Nah, that's for synchronous replication, which is overkill here. SVM DR is the way to go, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
1 year ago
SVM peering? Hmm, that's more for sharing resources between SVMs, not replicating them. I'll go with SVM DR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
1 year ago
MetroCluster is overkill for this scenario. It's more for high-availability setups, not just replicating volumes.
upvoted 0 times
Raymon
1 year ago
C) MetroCluster is indeed overkill for this situation, it's more for high-availability setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
1 year ago
B) SVM DR could also work well for replicating volumes and network configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
1 year ago
A) SnapMirror Synchronous is the best option for replicating volumes in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
1 year ago
SVM DR seems like the right choice here. It's designed for replicating storage virtual machines across data centers.
upvoted 0 times
Aide
1 year ago
C) MetroCluster
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
1 year ago
B) SVM DR
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 year ago
A) SnapMirror Synchronous
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rikki
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think MetroCluster could also be a good choice for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 year ago
I agree with Huey, SnapMirror Synchronous would be the best option to replicate the volumes and network configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 year ago
I think we should use SnapMirror Synchronous for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel