MENU
You are asked to replicate 15 of 20 volumes and the network configuration of your storage virtual machine to your other data center.
In this scenario, which NetApp technology should you use?
Suggested Answer: B, C
Get Premium NS0-194 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
PA
Patrick
11 months ago
I agree, SVM DR seems like the best fit!
LE
Leah
11 months ago
SVM peering doesn’t handle replication like the others.
GA
Gary
12 months ago
Wait, can you really replicate 15 volumes with SnapMirror Synchronous?
NI
Nicholle
12 months ago
I think MetroCluster is overkill here.
MA
Madelyn
12 months ago
Definitely SVM DR for this scenario.
DO
Doug
1 year ago
SVM peering seems like it could work, but I recall it’s more about connecting SVMs rather than replicating data across data centers.
HU
Hubert
1 year ago
I feel like SnapMirror Synchronous could be the right choice, but I’m confused about whether it’s meant for synchronous replication or just regular.
GE
Gerald
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about MetroCluster, but I don't think it fits this scenario since we only need to replicate some volumes.
TA
Tanesha
1 year ago
I think we might need to use SVM DR for replicating the volumes, but I'm not entirely sure if it covers the network configuration too.
NE
Nelida
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the "Entire grid" option would meet the requirement of iterating through all combinations, but it might be too resource-intensive. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of the other choices.
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
I've got a good strategy for this type of question. I'll carefully examine the details and eliminate the incorrect options to find the right answer.
DE
Dean
1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The most probable reason is that the IP-match criteria has been misconfigured for the ICMP traffic, causing it to be placed in the default queue instead of the expected queue 3.
GL
Gladis
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. I remember something about GUI editors being limited to the default browser or maybe a couple of installed browsers. I'll have to read the options carefully to figure this out.
GL
Glendora
1 year ago
SVM DR is the answer, no doubt. It's like the Uber of storage replication - gets the job done without all the unnecessary bells and whistles.
KR
Kristin
1 year ago
True, SVM DR is like the Uber of storage replication.
AN
Andrew
1 year ago
SnapMirror Synchronous could work too, but SVM DR is more straightforward.
GA
Gaston
1 year ago
I agree, it's simple and efficient.
SU
Susy
1 year ago
SVM DR is definitely the way to go.
MA
Ma
1 year ago
SnapMirror Synchronous? Nah, that's for synchronous replication, which is overkill here. SVM DR is the way to go, folks!
RA
Rachael
1 year ago
SVM peering? Hmm, that's more for sharing resources between SVMs, not replicating them. I'll go with SVM DR.
JA
Janessa
1 year ago
MetroCluster is overkill for this scenario. It's more for high-availability setups, not just replicating volumes.
RA
Raymon
1 year ago
C) MetroCluster is indeed overkill for this situation, it's more for high-availability setups.
CH
Chery
1 year ago
B) SVM DR could also work well for replicating volumes and network configuration.
EL
Elke
1 year ago
A) SnapMirror Synchronous is the best option for replicating volumes in this scenario.
JO
Joanna
1 year ago
SVM DR seems like the right choice here. It's designed for replicating storage virtual machines across data centers.
AI
Aide
1 year ago
C) MetroCluster
KY
Kyoko
1 year ago
B) SVM DR
OD
Odette
1 year ago
A) SnapMirror Synchronous
RI
Rikki
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think MetroCluster could also be a good choice for this task.
RO
Rosendo
2 years ago
I agree with Huey, SnapMirror Synchronous would be the best option to replicate the volumes and network configuration.
HU
Huey
2 years ago
I think we should use SnapMirror Synchronous for this scenario.