Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 6 Question 72 Discussion

A disaster causes a FlexGroup volume to be unrecoverable, but it was protected by a SnapMirror relationship. You solve the issue, and the source is operational. Now, you want to return to serving the data from the original source.In this scenario, what do you do next?
B) Restore data from a backup copy. and C) Perform a SnapMirror update.
A) Initialize the SnapMirror relationship.
D) Delete the SnapMirror relationship.

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 6 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 6
[All NS0-194 Questions]

A disaster causes a FlexGroup volume to be unrecoverable, but it was protected by a SnapMirror relationship. You solve the issue, and the source is operational. Now, you want to return to serving the data from the original source.

In this scenario, what do you do next?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Theron at Aug 04, 2024, 08:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-194 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gregoria
7 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question, isn’t it obvious?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
8 months ago
Initializing the SnapMirror seems unnecessary if the source is operational.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
8 months ago
Wait, why not just restore from a backup instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
8 months ago
I agree, option C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
8 months ago
You should perform a SnapMirror update to sync back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
9 months ago
Deleting the SnapMirror relationship seems drastic; I don't think that's the right move if we want to serve data from the original source again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
9 months ago
I feel like restoring from a backup copy could be an option, but since the source is operational, that might not be necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
9 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to initialize the SnapMirror relationship after a disaster, but I can't recall if that's the right step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
9 months ago
I think we might need to perform a SnapMirror update to sync the data back to the original source, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
9 months ago
I've got this! The key here is that the source is already operational, so we just need to update the SnapMirror relationship to resynchronize the data. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to remember the steps for recovering from a SnapMirror failure. I think I need to review my notes on SnapMirror operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward SnapMirror question. I think the answer is C - Perform a SnapMirror update to resynchronize the source and destination volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
9 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Since the source is operational, I don't think we need to restore from a backup. Initializing the SnapMirror relationship or deleting it don't seem like the right approach here. I'm leaning towards performing a SnapMirror update to bring the destination back in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
9 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about brainstorming techniques. I'll need to think carefully about the key characteristics of brainstorming to determine the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
9 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about injecting a default route into the MP-BGP address family for a specific VRF. I think I have a good understanding of that concept, so I'll give it a shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 year ago
Wait, does the question say the FlexGroup volume is unrecoverable? Yikes, I'd be doing a happy dance if I could just get the data back at all!
upvoted 0 times
In
1 year ago
Thanks! It was a tough situation, but we managed to recover the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
1 year ago
Great job! Now you can start serving data from the original source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 year ago
C) Perform a SnapMirror update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
A) Initialize the SnapMirror relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregoria
1 year ago
B is tempting, but why restore from a backup when you have the SnapMirror relationship to work with? Gotta be C, the SnapMirror update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 year ago
D? Seriously? Deleting the SnapMirror relationship? That would just be asking for trouble down the line.
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
1 year ago
B) Restore data from a backup copy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
1 year ago
C) Perform a SnapMirror update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
1 year ago
A) Initialize the SnapMirror relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phung
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A. Initializing the SnapMirror relationship will rebuild the connection and get the data flowing again.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
1 year ago
User 3: Let's go ahead and do that then, it's the most logical next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, that seems like the best way to get the data flowing from the original source again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should go with option A and initialize the SnapMirror relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Temeka
1 year ago
I think restoring data from a backup copy might be a safer option in case something goes wrong with the SnapMirror update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
1 year ago
I agree with Mickie, a SnapMirror update would be the best option to return to serving data from the original source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
1 year ago
Hmm, I think C is the answer. Performing a SnapMirror update should sync the data back to the original source, right?
upvoted 0 times
Alva
1 year ago
User 4: Definitely, it's crucial to ensure the data is up to date on the original source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, a SnapMirror update would be the best option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
1 year ago
User 2: Yes, that makes sense. It's important to keep the data synchronized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
1 year ago
User 1: I think C is the answer. Performing a SnapMirror update should sync the data back to the original source, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mickie
1 year ago
I think we should perform a SnapMirror update.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel