MENU
A disaster causes a FlexGroup volume to be unrecoverable, but it was protected by a SnapMirror relationship. You solve the issue, and the source is operational. Now, you want to return to serving the data from the original source.
In this scenario, what do you do next?
Suggested Answer: B, C
Get Premium NS0-194 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
GR
Gregoria
10 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question, isn’t it obvious?
EL
Elfriede
11 months ago
Initializing the SnapMirror seems unnecessary if the source is operational.
LE
Leonida
11 months ago
Wait, why not just restore from a backup instead?
EL
Elise
11 months ago
I agree, option C makes the most sense here.
RE
Reita
11 months ago
You should perform a SnapMirror update to sync back.
CA
Carline
12 months ago
Deleting the SnapMirror relationship seems drastic; I don't think that's the right move if we want to serve data from the original source again.
RO
Roslyn
12 months ago
I feel like restoring from a backup copy could be an option, but since the source is operational, that might not be necessary.
HE
Helga
12 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to initialize the SnapMirror relationship after a disaster, but I can't recall if that's the right step here.
JE
Jeannetta
1 year ago
I think we might need to perform a SnapMirror update to sync the data back to the original source, but I'm not entirely sure.
LO
Lorean
1 year ago
I've got this! The key here is that the source is already operational, so we just need to update the SnapMirror relationship to resynchronize the data. Option C is the way to go.
VI
Vilma
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to remember the steps for recovering from a SnapMirror failure. I think I need to review my notes on SnapMirror operations.
JE
Jeanice
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward SnapMirror question. I think the answer is C - Perform a SnapMirror update to resynchronize the source and destination volumes.
IS
Isaiah
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. Since the source is operational, I don't think we need to restore from a backup. Initializing the SnapMirror relationship or deleting it don't seem like the right approach here. I'm leaning towards performing a SnapMirror update to bring the destination back in sync.
GE
Gerald
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about brainstorming techniques. I'll need to think carefully about the key characteristics of brainstorming to determine the best answer.
LO
Lorenza
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about injecting a default route into the MP-BGP address family for a specific VRF. I think I have a good understanding of that concept, so I'll give it a shot.
NU
Nu
1 year ago
Wait, does the question say the FlexGroup volume is unrecoverable? Yikes, I'd be doing a happy dance if I could just get the data back at all!
IN
In
1 year ago
Thanks! It was a tough situation, but we managed to recover the data.
RO
Royal
1 year ago
Great job! Now you can start serving data from the original source.
CA
Catalina
1 year ago
C) Perform a SnapMirror update.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
A) Initialize the SnapMirror relationship.
GR
Gregoria
1 year ago
B is tempting, but why restore from a backup when you have the SnapMirror relationship to work with? Gotta be C, the SnapMirror update.
CA
Catalina
1 year ago
D? Seriously? Deleting the SnapMirror relationship? That would just be asking for trouble down the line.
MA
Marguerita
1 year ago
B) Restore data from a backup copy.
KI
Kizzy
1 year ago
C) Perform a SnapMirror update.
LU
Lucia
1 year ago
A) Initialize the SnapMirror relationship.
PH
Phung
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A. Initializing the SnapMirror relationship will rebuild the connection and get the data flowing again.
GL
Glory
1 year ago
User 3: Let's go ahead and do that then, it's the most logical next step.
YO
Yolande
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, that seems like the best way to get the data flowing from the original source again.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should go with option A and initialize the SnapMirror relationship.
TE
Temeka
2 years ago
I think restoring data from a backup copy might be a safer option in case something goes wrong with the SnapMirror update.
SO
Sommer
2 years ago
I agree with Mickie, a SnapMirror update would be the best option to return to serving data from the original source.
DW
Dwight
2 years ago
Hmm, I think C is the answer. Performing a SnapMirror update should sync the data back to the original source, right?
AL
Alva
1 year ago
User 4: Definitely, it's crucial to ensure the data is up to date on the original source.
DA
Dan
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, a SnapMirror update would be the best option in this scenario.
MA
Marylin
1 year ago
User 2: Yes, that makes sense. It's important to keep the data synchronized.
FE
Felicitas
1 year ago
User 1: I think C is the answer. Performing a SnapMirror update should sync the data back to the original source, right?
MI
Mickie
2 years ago
I think we should perform a SnapMirror update.