New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 3 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 3
[All NS0-194 Questions]

You are working on a fabric MetroCluster. After a site failure, the plex starts to resync automatically to the aggregate mirror of Aggr1. The plex now shows a status of resyncing. During this process, you experience a slow resync of the SyncMirror plex.

In this scenario, how do you solve the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Roxanne
2 months ago
Destroying and recreating the plex seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
2 months ago
I think tuning the resync speed is a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
2 months ago
Adding more disks could help with I/O capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
3 months ago
Definitely not a fan of option B, too much hassle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
3 months ago
Wait, can you really tune the resync speed like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
3 months ago
I vaguely recall something about using the storage raid-options command, but I can't remember the specifics. Is that really a viable solution?
upvoted 0 times
...
An
3 months ago
Destroying and recreating the plex sounds drastic. I feel like there might be a better way to handle the slow resync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
4 months ago
I think I saw a practice question where we had to tune the resync speed. Maybe the QoS policy option could help?
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
4 months ago
I remember something about adding disks to improve performance, but I'm not sure if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
4 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. I'd go with option B - destroying and re-creating the plex, then running a baseline sync. That should help get things back on track quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the implications of each option. Maybe I should review the relevant documentation before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
4 months ago
Alright, I've got this. The answer is clearly C - tuning the resync speed by adding a QoS policy and limiting the concurrent I/O to the aggregate. That should help optimize the process without having to do anything too drastic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is to find a way to speed up the resync process without impacting the overall system performance. I'll need to review the options and see which one makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel