NetApp Exam NS0-194 Topic 4 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam

Question #: 37
Topic #: 4

You are working on a fabric MetroCluster. After a site failure, the plex starts to resync automatically to the aggregate mirror of Aggr1. The plex now shows a status of resyncing. During this process, you experience a slow resync of the SyncMirror plex.

In this scenario, how do you solve the problem?

AAdd more disks to the aggregate to add more I/O capacity.

BDestroy and re-create plex, then run a baseline sync.

CTune the resync speed by adding a QoS policy and limit the concurrent I/O to the aggregate.

DTune the resync speed using the storage raid-options command.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Serina at Oct 11, 2022, 06:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-194 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kanisha

26 days ago

I think option C is the way to go. Tuning the resync speed is the key, and a QoS policy is the perfect tool for the job. Plus, it's probably more elegant than using the storage raid-options command. *winks*

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

27 days ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe I should just throw the whole fabric MetroCluster out the window and start over. That would solve the problem, right? *laughs*

upvoted 0 times

Ligia

1 days ago

B) Destroy and re-create plex, then run a baseline sync.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucy

2 days ago

A) Add more disks to the aggregate to add more I/O capacity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

1 months ago

Option B is the way to go! Destroying and re-creating the plex, then running a baseline sync is the best way to ensure a clean slate. Who needs slow resync when you can just start fresh?

upvoted 0 times

Susana

7 days ago

Option B is definitely the best solution. Starting fresh with a baseline sync is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephane

1 months ago

I'm leaning towards option D. Tuning the resync speed using the storage raid-options command seems like a more direct approach. Plus, it's probably faster than setting up a QoS policy.

upvoted 0 times

Bronwyn

1 days ago

Let's go with option D then. It seems like the most straightforward solution in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristin

10 days ago

I agree, it's a more efficient way to address the slow resync issue compared to setting up a QoS policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

11 days ago

Option D is a good choice. It allows you to directly tune the resync speed using the storage raid-options command.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barney

2 months ago

I think option C is the way to go. Tuning the resync speed using a QoS policy makes the most sense to me. Adding more disks might help, but that's a lot of work.

upvoted 0 times