NetApp Exam NS0-194 Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam

Question #: 65
Topic #: 2

You have a 4-node MetroCluster system. A node needs to be taken down for maintenance, but all data needs to remain online.

In this scenario, what should you do to bring down a single node?

APerform an HA takeover of the node.

BPerform a MetroCluster switchover.

CDisable HA on each side of the MetroCluster.

DPerform an aggregate relocation of the CFO aggregates on the node.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

by Floyd at May 08, 2024, 10:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-194 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Zena

3 months ago

Hey, does the node you're taking down have a funny name? I bet you could get away with calling it 'Maintenance Mabel' or something. That'd make the whole process a bit more entertaining.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

3 months ago

I'm going with B, the MetroCluster switchover. Anything that keeps the data online is the way to go, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Shoshana

26 days ago

D) Perform an aggregate relocation of the CFO aggregates on the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

27 days ago

C) Disable HA on each side of the MetroCluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johana

1 months ago

B) Perform a MetroCluster switchover.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brianne

1 months ago

A) Perform an HA takeover of the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reid

3 months ago

I bet option A would work, but it's a bit overkill. Why take over the whole node when a switchover will do the trick?

upvoted 0 times

Felice

1 months ago

B) Perform a MetroCluster switchover.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gussie

1 months ago

I agree, a switchover seems like a more efficient solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Han

2 months ago

B) Perform a MetroCluster switchover.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jess

2 months ago

A) Perform an HA takeover of the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

3 months ago

Definitely not C - disabling HA on both sides would just create a single point of failure. Not a smart move.

upvoted 0 times

Georgiann

2 months ago

D) Perform an aggregate relocation of the CFO aggregates on the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

3 months ago

B) Perform a MetroCluster switchover.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

3 months ago

A) Perform an HA takeover of the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nenita

3 months ago

I was leaning towards D, but you're right, a MetroCluster switchover is the way to go. Gotta keep that data online!

upvoted 0 times

Amalia

2 months ago

D) Perform an aggregate relocation of the CFO aggregates on the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zachary

3 months ago

C) Disable HA on each side of the MetroCluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

3 months ago

B) Perform a MetroCluster switchover.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veda

3 months ago

A) Perform an HA takeover of the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oren

4 months ago

Hmm, I think B is the correct answer here. A MetroCluster switchover will allow the node to be taken down without disrupting data availability.

upvoted 0 times

Roosevelt

3 months ago

Yes, that's right. It ensures that all data remains online while the maintenance is being carried out on the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keith

3 months ago

I agree, B is the correct answer. Performing a MetroCluster switchover is the best way to bring down a single node without affecting data availability.

upvoted 0 times

...