Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

You received the "CLUSTER ERROR: DISK/SHELF COUNT MISMATCH" AutoSupport message from an ONTAP cluster.When analyzing this message, which two should be inspected? (Choose two.)
C) drive firmware
A) drive paths
B) IOM firmware
D) SAS cabling

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-194 Questions]

You received the "CLUSTER ERROR: DISK/SHELF COUNT MISMATCH" AutoSupport message from an ONTAP cluster.

When analyzing this message, which two should be inspected? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cristy at Aug 18, 2022, 10:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-194 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Azzie
8 months ago
Agreed, drive paths and firmware are the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
8 months ago
I thought drive firmware was the main issue, not cabling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
9 months ago
Wait, why would SAS cabling matter here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
9 months ago
IOM firmware is crucial too, don’t overlook it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
9 months ago
Definitely check the drive paths first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenia
9 months ago
I feel like I should definitely look at IOM firmware, but I’m not sure if it’s the most critical one to inspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought SAS cabling was important, but I can't recall if it directly relates to this error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
9 months ago
I think I practiced a question like this, and I feel like drive firmware might be one of the things to check too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
9 months ago
I remember something about checking drive paths, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
9 months ago
I've got this! The question is asking for two configurations that work together. I'd say a cascading approval with a reporting structure, plus custom approvals, would be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
9 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The options mention things like hiding icons and disabling user overrides, but I'm not sure how those would specifically prevent manual row additions/removals in an array set. I'll have to review the standard functionality for array sets more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I understand the relationship between ServiceNow and the web service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the management representation letter is important, but I'm not totally clear on its exact purpose. I'll have to review my notes to make sure I understand the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
10 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on the functions of relational database services. I'll go through each option carefully and select the ones that seem most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
1 year ago
I'm stumped! Is the answer 'All of the above'? This question is really 'driving' me crazy.
upvoted 0 times
Mariko
1 year ago
C) drive firmware
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
1 year ago
A) drive paths
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zoila
1 year ago
Definitely B) IOM firmware and D) SAS cabling. Anything else would be a real 'cluster' of a mistake.
upvoted 0 times
Colette
1 year ago
Those two are definitely the key areas to focus on when troubleshooting this error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
1 year ago
Yes, and don't forget to inspect the SAS cabling as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
1 year ago
I agree, checking the IOM firmware is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mammie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm going with B) IOM firmware and D) SAS cabling. If the cables are messed up, that could definitely cause a disk/shelf count mismatch. Though I gotta say, this question is making me feel a bit 'SAS-sy' today!
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
1 year ago
Drive paths and drive firmware are important to check for this error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
1 year ago
I think both drive firmware and SAS cabling need to be looked at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 year ago
Yes, the SAS cabling should definitely be inspected as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
1 year ago
I agree, checking the IOM firmware is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
Drive paths and drive firmware are important to check for this error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 year ago
I think both drive firmware and SAS cabling need to be looked at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
Yes, the SAS cabling should definitely be inspected as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
I think inspecting the IOM firmware is also important to resolve the cluster error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
1 year ago
I agree, checking the SAS cabling is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
1 year ago
I agree, checking the IOM firmware is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonette
1 year ago
A) drive paths? Really? That's a bit of a stretch. I'd say B) IOM firmware and C) drive firmware are the obvious choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
1 year ago
I think the correct answers are B) IOM firmware and D) SAS cabling. The disk/shelf count mismatch indicates a problem with the hardware components connecting the disks to the storage system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
1 year ago
I believe drive paths and IOM firmware should also be inspected to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
1 year ago
I agree with Jovita. Drive firmware and SAS cabling are crucial in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
1 year ago
I think we should inspect drive firmware and SAS cabling.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel