New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-194 Questions]

You received the "CLUSTER ERROR: DISK/SHELF COUNT MISMATCH" AutoSupport message from an ONTAP cluster.

When analyzing this message, which two should be inspected? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cristy at Aug 18, 2022, 10:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-194 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Azzie
4 months ago
Agreed, drive paths and firmware are the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
4 months ago
I thought drive firmware was the main issue, not cabling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
4 months ago
Wait, why would SAS cabling matter here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
4 months ago
IOM firmware is crucial too, don’t overlook it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
4 months ago
Definitely check the drive paths first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenia
5 months ago
I feel like I should definitely look at IOM firmware, but I’m not sure if it’s the most critical one to inspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought SAS cabling was important, but I can't recall if it directly relates to this error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
5 months ago
I think I practiced a question like this, and I feel like drive firmware might be one of the things to check too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
5 months ago
I remember something about checking drive paths, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
5 months ago
I've got this! The question is asking for two configurations that work together. I'd say a cascading approval with a reporting structure, plus custom approvals, would be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The options mention things like hiding icons and disabling user overrides, but I'm not sure how those would specifically prevent manual row additions/removals in an array set. I'll have to review the standard functionality for array sets more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I understand the relationship between ServiceNow and the web service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the management representation letter is important, but I'm not totally clear on its exact purpose. I'll have to review my notes to make sure I understand the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on the functions of relational database services. I'll go through each option carefully and select the ones that seem most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
10 months ago
I'm stumped! Is the answer 'All of the above'? This question is really 'driving' me crazy.
upvoted 0 times
Mariko
9 months ago
C) drive firmware
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
9 months ago
A) drive paths
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zoila
10 months ago
Definitely B) IOM firmware and D) SAS cabling. Anything else would be a real 'cluster' of a mistake.
upvoted 0 times
Colette
9 months ago
Those two are definitely the key areas to focus on when troubleshooting this error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
9 months ago
Yes, and don't forget to inspect the SAS cabling as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
9 months ago
I agree, checking the IOM firmware is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mammie
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with B) IOM firmware and D) SAS cabling. If the cables are messed up, that could definitely cause a disk/shelf count mismatch. Though I gotta say, this question is making me feel a bit 'SAS-sy' today!
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
8 months ago
Drive paths and drive firmware are important to check for this error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
8 months ago
I think both drive firmware and SAS cabling need to be looked at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
8 months ago
Yes, the SAS cabling should definitely be inspected as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
8 months ago
I agree, checking the IOM firmware is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
8 months ago
Drive paths and drive firmware are important to check for this error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
8 months ago
I think both drive firmware and SAS cabling need to be looked at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
9 months ago
Yes, the SAS cabling should definitely be inspected as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
10 months ago
I think inspecting the IOM firmware is also important to resolve the cluster error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
10 months ago
I agree, checking the SAS cabling is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
10 months ago
I agree, checking the IOM firmware is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonette
10 months ago
A) drive paths? Really? That's a bit of a stretch. I'd say B) IOM firmware and C) drive firmware are the obvious choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
10 months ago
I think the correct answers are B) IOM firmware and D) SAS cabling. The disk/shelf count mismatch indicates a problem with the hardware components connecting the disks to the storage system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
11 months ago
I believe drive paths and IOM firmware should also be inspected to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
11 months ago
I agree with Jovita. Drive firmware and SAS cabling are crucial in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
11 months ago
I think we should inspect drive firmware and SAS cabling.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel