Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-184 Exam - Topic 8 Question 40 Discussion

Posted by Jina on Mar 06, 2024 at 08:02 PM

You are using Broadcom BES-53248 switches for a cluster interconnect in a base configuration.

In this scenario, what is the minimum number of ISLs supported between the switches?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium NS0-184 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
SH
Shenika 10 months ago
I thought it could be 3, but 2 makes sense too!
DE
Denae 11 months ago
I agree, 2 is the right answer.
CA
Catalina 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not 1? Seems low.
DY
Dyan 11 months ago
Definitely 2, that's standard for redundancy.
AR
Arlene 11 months ago
I think it's 2 ISLs minimum.
JE
Jean 12 months ago
I thought it was 4 ISLs for full redundancy, but now I’m second-guessing myself. Maybe I should go with D?
GE
German 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, 2 ISLs, but I could be mixing it up with another switch model.
VI
Vincenza 12 months ago
I feel like I practiced a question similar to this, and it mentioned needing at least 3 ISLs. Could it be option C?
VE
Venita 1 year ago
I think the minimum ISLs might be 2, but I’m not completely sure. I remember something about redundancy being important.
CH
Chana 1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question is asking about a specific switch model, and I'm not familiar with the technical details. I'll need to review the product documentation or ask the instructor for more guidance on this type of question.
ED
Edna 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on my understanding, the minimum number of ISLs supported between the Broadcom BES-53248 switches in a base configuration is 2. I'll double-check my answer, but I'm feeling confident about this one.
ER
Erasmo 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not familiar with the Broadcom BES-53248 switches, so I'll need to do some research to understand the base configuration and the minimum number of ISLs supported.
CO
Colton 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'll need to review the documentation on the Broadcom BES-53248 switches and their base configuration requirements.
VI
Viola 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. I know deposit insurance is important, but I'm not sure I fully understand the differences between the options. I'll have to think this through carefully before answering.
YO
Yong 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. I'll need to review my notes on Salesforce best practices to make sure I understand the key considerations here.
ER
Ernie 1 year ago
Wait, did they just say 'Broadcom BES-53248 switches'? I thought those were only used for deep-sea fishing expeditions!
BE
Belen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ernie
C) 3
SY
Sylvie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ernie
B) 2
HE
Henriette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ernie
A) 1
LI
Lina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ernie
C) 3
CA
Carry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ernie
B) 2
AN
Antione 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ernie
A) 1
CO
Corrinne 1 year ago
I got this! The answer is B - 2 ISLs. That's the minimum required for a redundant cluster interconnect. Easy peasy!
AV
Avery 1 year ago
Oh man, I'm totally stumped on this one. Maybe I should've paid more attention in class... D - 4 ISLs, just to hedge my bets?
NI
Nicolette 2 years ago
That makes sense, having 3 ISLs would provide better resiliency in case of a link failure.
AN
Angelica 2 years ago
Definitely C - 3 ISLs. That's the standard for cluster interconnects, isn't it? Time to brush up on my switch config knowledge!
EM
Emilio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Angelica
That's right, 3 ISLs is the standard for cluster interconnects with Broadcom BES-53248 switches.
PA
Paz 1 year ago
↳ replying to Angelica
Yes, you're correct. The minimum number of ISLs supported between the switches is 3.
SH
Shasta 2 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to guess B - 2 ISLs. That just seems like the most logical choice for a base configuration.
ED
Eden 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shasta
User 4: D - 4 ISLs is my guess. More connections for stability.
KI
Kirby 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shasta
User 3: I'll go with C - 3 ISLs. It might provide better redundancy.
KI
Kirk 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shasta
User 2: I'm going with B - 2 ISLs. That seems like a good choice.
CO
Colby 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shasta
User 1: I think the answer is A - 1 ISL.
MA
Mari 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's 3 because we need redundancy in the cluster interconnect.
NI
Nicolette 2 years ago
I think the minimum number of ISLs supported is 2.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel