Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-184 Exam - Topic 5 Question 43 Discussion

Click the Exhibit button.Immediately after installing a 4-node FAS8200 cluster, you discover that node, ''cluster1-02'', must be removed from the cluster. You want to use the cluster remove-node command to remove the node.Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
A) Verify that high availability is configured for failover to the HA partner, then remove the node. and C) Move Epsilon to cluster1-02, then remove the node.
B) Make the node ineligible by using the cluster modify -eligibility false command, then remove the node.
D) Remove the node, then the cluster will elect a new master to remain in quorum.

NetApp NS0-184 Exam - Topic 5 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-184 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 5
[All NS0-184 Questions]

Click the Exhibit button.

Immediately after installing a 4-node FAS8200 cluster, you discover that node, ''cluster1-02'', must be removed from the cluster. You want to use the cluster remove-node command to remove the node.

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Xuan at Apr 21, 2024, 04:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-184 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nan
7 months ago
Wow, I didn’t know you could do that with Epsilon!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
8 months ago
D seems risky, removing the node first? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
8 months ago
I’m not so sure about C, moving Epsilon seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
8 months ago
B sounds right too, making the node ineligible is a good step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
8 months ago
A is definitely correct, HA needs to be set up first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
9 months ago
Removing the node first seems risky; I think option D might not be right since it could cause issues with quorum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
9 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think moving Epsilon is not necessary before removal, so I’m leaning away from option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like making the node ineligible first, like in option B, is a common step in similar scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
9 months ago
I remember something about high availability being important when removing nodes, so I think option A might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
9 months ago
Removing the node directly could be risky - I'll need to be careful to maintain quorum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
9 months ago
Okay, I think the key is to make the node ineligible first, then remove it. That should keep the cluster in quorum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
9 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll need to verify the HA configuration first before removing the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the Epsilon node - does that need to be moved before removing the node?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
9 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
9 months ago
This looks straightforward. I'll go with host, src, and dst since those seem like the most relevant options for filtering by IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 years ago
I would go with Option B as well. It's important to ensure the node is properly prepared for removal.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 years ago
I think Option B is also a valid choice. Making the node ineligible can help in removing it safely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
2 years ago
I agree with User1. Option A is the correct approach for removing the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
2 years ago
Option A is correct. High availability should be configured before removing the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
Alright, let's do that then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
2 years ago
Seems like the safest approach based on the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
So, we should do both A) Verify high availability and B) Make the node ineligible before removing it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
2 years ago
That could also be a necessary step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
What about making the node ineligible first with the cluster modify command?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
2 years ago
Yes, that sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
Should we verify that high availability is configured for failover to the HA partner before removing the node?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel