MENU
Click the Exhibit button.
Immediately after installing a 4-node FAS8200 cluster, you discover that node, ''cluster1-02'', must be removed from the cluster. You want to use the cluster remove-node command to remove the node.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
Suggested Answer: A, C
Get Premium NS0-184 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
NA
Nan
10 months ago
Wow, I didn’t know you could do that with Epsilon!
CA
Cammy
11 months ago
D seems risky, removing the node first? Really?
JE
Jerry
11 months ago
I’m not so sure about C, moving Epsilon seems unnecessary.
WE
Wendell
11 months ago
B sounds right too, making the node ineligible is a good step.
EI
Eileen
11 months ago
A is definitely correct, HA needs to be set up first.
KA
Kami
12 months ago
Removing the node first seems risky; I think option D might not be right since it could cause issues with quorum.
FL
Florencia
12 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think moving Epsilon is not necessary before removal, so I’m leaning away from option C.
FE
Felicitas
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like making the node ineligible first, like in option B, is a common step in similar scenarios.
NI
Nidia
1 year ago
I remember something about high availability being important when removing nodes, so I think option A might be correct.
LA
Lazaro
1 year ago
Removing the node directly could be risky - I'll need to be careful to maintain quorum.
MA
Maryann
1 year ago
Okay, I think the key is to make the node ineligible first, then remove it. That should keep the cluster in quorum.
CA
Carolann
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll need to verify the HA configuration first before removing the node.
CA
Camellia
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the Epsilon node - does that need to be moved before removing the node?
MA
Margurite
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
CL
Cletus
1 year ago
This looks straightforward. I'll go with host, src, and dst since those seem like the most relevant options for filtering by IP address.
LE
Lettie
2 years ago
I would go with Option B as well. It's important to ensure the node is properly prepared for removal.
KI
King
2 years ago
I think Option B is also a valid choice. Making the node ineligible can help in removing it safely.
MA
Maira
2 years ago
I agree with User1. Option A is the correct approach for removing the node.
LA
Latonia
2 years ago
Option A is correct. High availability should be configured before removing the node.
AL
Alona
2 years ago
Alright, let's do that then.
HI
Hildred
2 years ago
Seems like the safest approach based on the options provided.
AL
Alona
2 years ago
So, we should do both A) Verify high availability and B) Make the node ineligible before removing it?
HI
Hildred
2 years ago
That could also be a necessary step.
AL
Alona
2 years ago
What about making the node ineligible first with the cluster modify command?
HI
Hildred
2 years ago
Yes, that sounds like a good idea.
AL
Alona
3 years ago
Should we verify that high availability is configured for failover to the HA partner before removing the node?