New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-184 Exam - Topic 5 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-184 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 5
[All NS0-184 Questions]

Click the Exhibit button.

Immediately after installing a 4-node FAS8200 cluster, you discover that node, ''cluster1-02'', must be removed from the cluster. You want to use the cluster remove-node command to remove the node.

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Xuan at Apr 21, 2024, 04:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-184 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nan
3 months ago
Wow, I didn’t know you could do that with Epsilon!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
3 months ago
D seems risky, removing the node first? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
3 months ago
I’m not so sure about C, moving Epsilon seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
4 months ago
B sounds right too, making the node ineligible is a good step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
4 months ago
A is definitely correct, HA needs to be set up first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
4 months ago
Removing the node first seems risky; I think option D might not be right since it could cause issues with quorum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
4 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think moving Epsilon is not necessary before removal, so I’m leaning away from option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like making the node ineligible first, like in option B, is a common step in similar scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
5 months ago
I remember something about high availability being important when removing nodes, so I think option A might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
5 months ago
Removing the node directly could be risky - I'll need to be careful to maintain quorum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
5 months ago
Okay, I think the key is to make the node ineligible first, then remove it. That should keep the cluster in quorum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll need to verify the HA configuration first before removing the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the Epsilon node - does that need to be moved before removing the node?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
5 months ago
This looks straightforward. I'll go with host, src, and dst since those seem like the most relevant options for filtering by IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 years ago
I would go with Option B as well. It's important to ensure the node is properly prepared for removal.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 years ago
I think Option B is also a valid choice. Making the node ineligible can help in removing it safely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
2 years ago
I agree with User1. Option A is the correct approach for removing the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
2 years ago
Option A is correct. High availability should be configured before removing the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
Alright, let's do that then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
2 years ago
Seems like the safest approach based on the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
So, we should do both A) Verify high availability and B) Make the node ineligible before removing it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
2 years ago
That could also be a necessary step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
What about making the node ineligible first with the cluster modify command?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
2 years ago
Yes, that sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
Should we verify that high availability is configured for failover to the HA partner before removing the node?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel