Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-184 Exam - Topic 5 Question 12 Discussion

Click the Exhibit button.Immediately after installing a 4-node FAS8200 cluster, you discover that node, ''cluster1-02'', must be removed from the cluster. You want to use the cluster remove-node command to remove the node.Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
A) Verify that high availability is configured for failover to the HA partner, then remove the node. and C) Move Epsilon to cluster1-02, then remove the node.
B) Make the node ineligible by using the cluster modify -eligibility false command, then remove the node.
D) Remove the node, then the cluster will elect a new master to remain in quorum.

NetApp NS0-184 Exam - Topic 5 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-184 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 5
[All NS0-184 Questions]

Click the Exhibit button.

Immediately after installing a 4-node FAS8200 cluster, you discover that node, ''cluster1-02'', must be removed from the cluster. You want to use the cluster remove-node command to remove the node.

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Yoko at Jun 25, 2022, 01:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-184 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Franchesca
10 months ago
C is not needed, just focus on A and B for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
10 months ago
D sounds risky, better check quorum rules before doing that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
10 months ago
Wait, can you really just remove the node without any issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
10 months ago
I think B is the right move too, makes sense to modify eligibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
10 months ago
A is definitely correct, HA needs to be set up first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
11 months ago
Removing the node first and then electing a new master sounds risky. I thought we needed to ensure quorum before doing that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about moving Epsilon to cluster1-02. I feel like that might not be necessary for removal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
11 months ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this where we had to make a node ineligible first. That might be option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
11 months ago
I remember something about checking high availability before removing a node. That seems important for failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know WiFi 6/6E is the latest standard, but I'm not sure which of these platforms actually supports it. I'll have to make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
11 months ago
It seems to me that option A is the best choice, but I worry I might be confusing it with other types of graphs we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
11 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. Since the release is date-driven, we need to make sure we have enough time built in to handle any uncertainties. A schedule buffer seems like the logical choice here to give us that flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
11 months ago
I practiced similar questions, and modifying the nhs address sounds familiar, like option A could be relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
11 months ago
The solution of using a webhook and Azure Function sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if a synchronous post-operation step is the best approach to avoid data loss. I'll need to explore other options that might be more resilient.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel