Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-184 Exam - Topic 5 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-184 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 5
[All NS0-184 Questions]

Click the Exhibit button.

Immediately after installing a 4-node FAS8200 cluster, you discover that node, ''cluster1-02'', must be removed from the cluster. You want to use the cluster remove-node command to remove the node.

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Yoko at Jun 25, 2022, 01:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-184 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Franchesca
5 months ago
C is not needed, just focus on A and B for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
5 months ago
D sounds risky, better check quorum rules before doing that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
6 months ago
Wait, can you really just remove the node without any issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
6 months ago
I think B is the right move too, makes sense to modify eligibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
6 months ago
A is definitely correct, HA needs to be set up first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
6 months ago
Removing the node first and then electing a new master sounds risky. I thought we needed to ensure quorum before doing that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about moving Epsilon to cluster1-02. I feel like that might not be necessary for removal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
6 months ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this where we had to make a node ineligible first. That might be option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
6 months ago
I remember something about checking high availability before removing a node. That seems important for failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know WiFi 6/6E is the latest standard, but I'm not sure which of these platforms actually supports it. I'll have to make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
6 months ago
It seems to me that option A is the best choice, but I worry I might be confusing it with other types of graphs we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
6 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. Since the release is date-driven, we need to make sure we have enough time built in to handle any uncertainties. A schedule buffer seems like the logical choice here to give us that flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
6 months ago
I practiced similar questions, and modifying the nhs address sounds familiar, like option A could be relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
7 months ago
The solution of using a webhook and Azure Function sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if a synchronous post-operation step is the best approach to avoid data loss. I'll need to explore other options that might be more resilient.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel