Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-163 Exam - Topic 8 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-163 exam

Question #: 17
Topic #: 8

[All NS0-163 Questions]

What should be done to non-distuptlvely correct capacity Imbalances in a FlexGroup?

AConvert the FlexGroup to a FlexVol

BMove the FlexGroup to a different aggregate

CMove the constituent to a new aggregate

DPerform a rebalance of the FlexGroup constituents

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Carol at Nov 15, 2024, 02:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-163 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Quentin

9 months ago

Rebalancing sounds like the safest bet for minimal disruption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

9 months ago

Definitely not a fan of moving the FlexGroup itself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

9 months ago

Surprised that converting to a FlexVol is even an option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

10 months ago

I think performing a rebalance is the best way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Serina

10 months ago

Moving the constituent to a new aggregate is a solid option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nada

10 months ago

Moving the FlexGroup itself seems too disruptive, so I guess it has to be about rebalancing or moving constituents.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desire

10 months ago

I feel like converting to a FlexVol is not the right move here, but I can't recall why exactly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

10 months ago

I remember practicing a question about rebalancing FlexGroups, so maybe option D is the correct answer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammara

11 months ago

I think moving the constituent to a new aggregate might be the right approach, but I'm not entirely sure if that's non-disruptive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

11 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'm going to have to carefully consider the pros and cons of each option before making a decision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosita

11 months ago

I'm not entirely confident, but I'm leaning towards option C - moving the constituent to a new aggregate. That seems like it could help address the capacity issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorcas

11 months ago

Okay, I think I know the answer to this. It's option D - performing a rebalance of the FlexGroup constituents. That should help correct any capacity imbalances without disrupting the FlexGroup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll have to review my notes on FlexGroups to see if I can figure out the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

11 months ago

This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to think through the options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

2 years ago

C) Move the constituent to a new aggregate? That's like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dacia

2 years ago

D) Perform a rebalance of the FlexGroup constituents - Easy peasy, let's get this capacity imbalance fixed!

upvoted 0 times

Danilo

2 years ago

D) Perform a rebalance of the FlexGroup constituents

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicia

2 years ago

C) Move the constituent to a new aggregate

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

2 years ago

B) Move the FlexGroup to a different aggregate

upvoted 0 times

...

Dortha

2 years ago

A) Convert the FlexGroup to a FlexVol

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Curtis

2 years ago

B) Move the FlexGroup to a different aggregate? Hmm, sounds like a lot of work. I'll just call my IT guy and have him handle it.

upvoted 0 times

Julian

2 years ago

D) Perform a rebalance of the FlexGroup constituents

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

2 years ago

A) Convert the FlexGroup to a FlexVol

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Meghann

2 years ago

I believe converting the FlexGroup to a FlexVol could also be a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliann

2 years ago

A) Convert the FlexGroup to a FlexVol? Really? That's like trading a Ferrari for a bicycle!

upvoted 0 times

Francine

2 years ago

A) Convert the FlexGroup to a FlexVol? Really? That's like trading a Ferrari for a bicycle!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

2 years ago

D) Perform a rebalance of the FlexGroup constituents

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

2 years ago

B) Move the FlexGroup to a different aggregate

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Queen

2 years ago

D) Perform a rebalance of the FlexGroup constituents - That's the only non-disruptive option, right? I don't want to mess up my FlexGroup!

upvoted 0 times

Aleisha

2 years ago

D) Perform a rebalance of the FlexGroup constituents - That's the only non-disruptive option, right? I don't want to mess up my FlexGroup!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sophia

2 years ago

D) Perform a rebalance of the FlexGroup constituents

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenna

2 years ago

C) Move the constituent to a new aggregate

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariko

2 years ago

B) Move the FlexGroup to a different aggregate

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

2 years ago

A) Convert the FlexGroup to a FlexVol

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Ressie

2 years ago

I agree with Von, that could help correct the capacity imbalances.

upvoted 0 times

...

Von

2 years ago

I think we should move the FlexGroup to a different aggregate.

upvoted 0 times

...