Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NAHQ CPHQ Exam - Topic 5 Question 95 Discussion

The chart above is used by a team to document process improvement results following an intervention that was implemented during the 20th week. Based on this chart, the team can conclude:
B) The intervention resulted in a shift in performance.
A) Variation in the process has decreased.
C) The process is in control.
D) There is a downward trend in performance.

NAHQ CPHQ Exam - Topic 5 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for NAHQ's CPHQ exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 5
[All CPHQ Questions]

The chart above is used by a team to document process improvement results following an intervention that was implemented during the 20th week. Based on this chart, the team can conclude:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Understanding the Control Chart ComponentsThis control chart shows the median delay over time (by week), with control limits (UCL - Upper Control Limit, LCL - Lower Control Limit) and a center line (CL) indicating the process average before the intervention. Control charts like this one are used to determine whether an intervention has led to a significant change in process performance.

Analyzing the Data Before and After the Intervention

From weeks 1 to 19, before theintervention, the process appears to fluctuate around the control limits, with several points near the upper control limit, indicating higher variation and a generally stable process around a higher median delay.

After week 20, following the intervention, the data points show a clear shift downward, consistently staying below the previous control line (CL). The process median delay has notably reduced, and all data points fall within a new, lower range.

Conclusion Based on the Control Chart

The consistent reduction in median delay and the clustering of data points below the previous center line indicate a shift in performance rather than mere random variation. This type of change, sustained over multiple weeks, strongly suggests that the intervention had a substantial impact on reducing the delay.

While there may also be a decrease in variation, the primary visible effect is a shift in performance toward lower median delay values.

Rationale for Selecting Answer BThe correct answer is B. The intervention resulted in a shift in performance, as the chart shows a distinct change in the process level post-intervention, indicating an improvement.


NAHQ 'Quality Improvement in Healthcare: Statistical Process Control'

'Interpreting Control Charts forProcess Improvement' (NAHQ, 2020)

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Giuseppe
5 hours ago
I vaguely recall that if variation decreases, it might suggest the process is more stable, which could support A. But I’m not confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
5 days ago
I feel like we had a practice question that mentioned trends, and it was about identifying if performance was improving or declining. Could D be a possibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
11 days ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about control charts. If the process is in control, wouldn't that mean A could also be true?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
16 days ago
I think we discussed how a shift in performance usually indicates a successful intervention, so maybe B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel