NAHQ CPHQ Exam - Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for NAHQ's CPHQ exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 5

[All CPHQ Questions]

A hand surgeon is referred for peer review for a case of a wrong-site surgery. Which of the following professionals would be the best choice as a member of the peer review committee?

Aplastic surgeon with comparable training

Bchief of surgery with general surgery experience

Cquality Improvement coordinator with peer review experience

Dphysician assistant who routinely assists In hand surgeries

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Medication reconciliation is the process of identifying and resolving medication discrepancies to ensure that patients receive the correct medications. This process involves comparing the patient's current medications with new prescriptions, ensuring that there are no omissions, duplications, or interactions that could lead to adverse effects.

Steps in Medication Reconciliation: The process typically involves:

Collecting an accurate list of the patient's current medications (including prescription, over-the-counter, and herbal supplements).

Comparing this list with new medication orders or prescriptions.

Identifying discrepancies, such as omitted medications, incorrect dosages, or potentially harmful drug interactions.

Resolving these discrepancies by consulting with the prescribing physician, pharmacist, or other healthcare providers.

Comparison to Other Options:

B . creating a list of a patient's prescription medications: While creating a medication list is a part of the reconciliation process, the primary goal is to resolve discrepancies, not just to list medications.

C . monitoring patient adherence to medication regimens: Monitoring adherence is important, but it is not the primary focus of medication reconciliation.

D . sharing responsibility between pharmacy and nursing: While collaboration between pharmacy and nursing is essential, medication reconciliation is specifically about identifying and addressing discrepancies.

by Reena at Jan 14, 2025, 05:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPHQ Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elbert

3 months ago

Quality Improvement coordinator sounds interesting, but can they really judge?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

3 months ago

Wait, why would a PA be on this committee? Seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francisca

3 months ago

A plastic surgeon? Not sure that's the best fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

4 months ago

Definitely agree, they have the experience needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billi

4 months ago

I think the chief of surgery is a solid choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalyn

4 months ago

I feel like the physician assistant might not have the authority needed for a peer review, even if they assist in surgeries regularly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

4 months ago

The quality improvement coordinator sounds like a solid choice since they have peer review experience, but I’m not entirely sure how that translates to this specific case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geraldine

4 months ago

I think the chief of surgery could provide valuable insights, but I wonder if their general experience is enough for a hand surgery case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aimee

5 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of having someone with relevant experience on the peer review committee, but I'm not sure if a plastic surgeon would be the best fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

5 months ago

The chief of surgery with general surgery experience could also be a good choice, since they would have broad medical expertise and knowledge of surgical procedures. But I think the plastic surgeon is still the safest bet for this specific case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamekia

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards the plastic surgeon option. They would likely have the most in-depth understanding of the technical aspects of the hand surgery and be best equipped to provide a thorough peer review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Twana

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions a "wrong-site surgery," so I'm wondering if a quality improvement coordinator with peer review experience might be a better choice to investigate the procedural issues that led to the mistake.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about peer review for a medical case. I think the best choice would be a plastic surgeon with comparable training, since they would have the most relevant expertise to evaluate the hand surgery case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

9 months ago

If I were on the peer review committee, I'd want to get to the bottom of this case, no matter how finger-pointing it gets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Germaine

9 months ago

I'd hate to be the one who did the wrong-site surgery. Talk about a hand-y mistake!

upvoted 0 times

Glen

8 months ago

C) quality Improvement coordinator with peer review experience

upvoted 0 times

...

Yoko

8 months ago

B) chief of surgery with general surgery experience

upvoted 0 times

...

Lasandra

9 months ago

A) plastic surgeon with comparable training

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

9 months ago

The physician assistant who routinely assists in hand surgeries might have a good understanding of the procedures, but a surgeon would likely be a better fit for the committee.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

9 months ago

The quality improvement coordinator with peer review experience seems like a smart choice. They can bring an objective, process-oriented perspective to the review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thurman

9 months ago

The chief of surgery with general surgery experience could provide valuable insights, but a hand-specific expert would be more appropriate for this case.

upvoted 0 times

Tayna

9 months ago

D) physician assistant who routinely assists in hand surgeries

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

9 months ago

I agree, a hand-specific expert would be the best choice for this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecily

9 months ago

C) quality Improvement coordinator with peer review experience

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

9 months ago

A) plastic surgeon with comparable training

upvoted 0 times

...

Chara

10 months ago

As a hand surgery specialist, I'd say a plastic surgeon with comparable training would be the best choice for the peer review committee. They have the necessary expertise to evaluate the case.

upvoted 0 times