New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NAHQ CPHQ Exam - Topic 2 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for NAHQ's CPHQ exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 2
[All CPHQ Questions]

A patient was in the operating room when a piece of a surgical instrument broke off and was left in the patient's body. The patient was readmitted for removal of the foreign object. Which of the following would most likely apply in this situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Helaine
4 months ago
Are we sure it's not contractual liability? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
4 months ago
Wow, I can't believe they left something inside!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
4 months ago
Tort liability seems more fitting here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
4 months ago
Really? I thought contributory negligence might apply too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
5 months ago
This is definitely a case of res ipsa loquitur.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
5 months ago
I’m torn between res ipsa loquitur and tort liability. I know res ipsa loquitur means the incident speaks for itself, but I’m not confident about which one is more applicable here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
5 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question on tort liability that was similar. It seems like the best fit for this situation since it involves harm caused by negligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
5 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think contributory negligence might not fit here since the patient didn’t do anything wrong, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
5 months ago
I remember discussing res ipsa loquitur in class, especially how it applies when something obviously went wrong during surgery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Jaeger, Zipkin, and Skywalking are all open-source distributed tracing systems, so those are the three correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify any statements that violate the foreign key relationship between the two tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the focus on testing also helps in reducing development time. There was a practice question about that, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
5 months ago
I think this is about using Differentiated Services, right? It allows for multiple classes of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel