New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

MikroTik MTCNA Exam - Topic 12 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for MikroTik's MTCNA exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 12
[All MTCNA Questions]

Mark all correct answers.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Kattie at May 04, 2022, 05:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MTCNA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Annett
4 months ago
Wait, is disabling the interface really the only way?
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
4 months ago
D is a bit extreme, there are other options too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
4 months ago
C sounds a bit off, not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
4 months ago
B is spot on, access-lists are key for AP control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
5 months ago
A is definitely true, you can block auth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
5 months ago
Option D seems too absolute; I thought there were other methods to prevent connections besides just disabling the interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
5 months ago
I feel like option C might be right too, but I need to double-check if default-forwarding can actually be controlled by access-lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about option A; I remember something about firewall filters but can't recall the specifics on authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
5 months ago
I think option B is correct because we discussed how access-lists can manage connections to APs in our last practice session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the options. I'll need to review the details on CommonJS modules and how to integrate them into a Controller-only site.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. I think the key here is that it's a "follow-up" audit, so the goal must be to assess whether the organization is still meeting the ISO/IEC 20000 requirements after the initial certification. Option B sounds like the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
5 months ago
I think A is too broad, and D sounds wrong because we want stability in our interventions. I'm leaning towards C for its focus on consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm not sure if configuring a single box development environment (option B) is the best approach for handling peak loads. I think I'd focus more on the performance testing and server optimization options.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel